I have an October 2019 version and am seeing the same thing as @MCFS
I also have a 2019 version that does not include the editorial note with a link to the update process, even though it includes all the rest of the version history, all the way back to 2004. The latest update mentioned is this:
View attachment 24631
I have an Oct 3, 2019 PDF of the 2019 review and am seeing the same thing as
@ME/CFS Skeptic - no editorial note and the most recent amendment is dated August 8, 2019.
The citation in the Oct 2019 PDF is listed as follows, which is the same as in the current PDF of the 2019 review (
here).
"Larun L, Brurberg KG, Odgaard-Jensen J, Price JR. Exercise therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2019, Issue 10. Art. No.: CD003200. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003200.pub8."
But the publication dates in these two PDFs are not the same:
My 2019 version - "Publication status and date: Edited (conclusions changed), published in Issue 10, 2019."
The current version - "Publication status and date: Edited (no change to conclusions), published in Issue 3, 2021."
And the "What's New" sections are different. For the Oct 3, 2019 PFD, there are 2 entries dated August 8, 2019 while in the current version, there's just one entry dated March 18, 2021. From August 8, 2019 to March 18, 2021 inclusive, there are 8 distinct dates of amendments. So does this suggest they are releasing a different version of the 2019 review for at least some of these different dates?
As an aside, the online version of the publication history
(here) does not include the August 8, 2019 amendments. An error in maintaining the revision history for online purposes? the format is not the same as in the PDF so it looks like something being maintained separately