Closed meeting June 28, 2018 at National Institutes of Health

[MeSci]

Source: U.S. Federal Register

Vol. 83, #105, p 25025

Date: May 25, 2018

URL:
https://www.federalregister.gov/doc...r-scientific-review-notice-of-closed-meetings

https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2018-05-31/pdf/2018-11722.pdf

[A Notice by the National Institutes of Health]

Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings
-------------------------------------------------------

Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel; Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome.

Date: June 28, 2018.

Time: 11:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.

Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.

Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).

Contact Person: Jana Drgonova, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5213, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-827-2549,

jdrgonova@mail.nih.gov.

Dated: May 25, 2018.

Sylvia L. Neal,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2018-11722 Filed 5-30-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P

 

[Sunshine3]

Fingers crossed Mark Davis and Ron Davis get funding

 

[Trish]

Fingers crossed lots of good bids go in and get funding.

 

[Hoopoe]

Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.

What does it mean that such a meeting is held? Is this how grant applications are normally reviewed, or is it special meeting justified by particular circumstances?

This bit

Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel; Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome.

suggests there is special emphasis.

My wild fantasy: they will shove as much money as they can into grants, word will get around that it's easy to get grants for ME/CFS, and we will see more research. Some studies of questionable quality, others of good quality WITH high sample size.

 

[Sunshine3]

What does it mean that such a meeting is held? Is this how grant applications are normally reviewed, or is it special meeting justified by particular circumstances?

This bit



suggests there is special emphasis.

My wild fantasy: they will shove as much money as they can into grants, word will get around that it's easy to get grants for ME/CFS, and we will see more research. Some studies of questionable quality, others of good quality WITH high sample size.

Funny how our 'wild fantasies' change with illness....I share your wild fantasy