JemPD
Senior Member (Voting Rights)
@Arnie Pye @BruceInOz thanks so much for the tips re twitter
https://www.anhinternational.org/news/pharmascope-the-tool-that-may-have-blinded-your-doctor/However, taking on the System isn’t that straightforward. Even when you have accurate research data to back up your position it doesn’t mean that the media is on your side and your position will make it into the stark light of day. Such is the example of the PACE trial of 2011, which has been responsible for the treatment paradigm experienced by an estimated 250,000 sufferers in the UK.
Science fraud?
The psychologists behind the original £8M trial claimed that cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) and graded exercise therapy (GET) be the treatment options of choice. Despite a strong response from patient groups where many sufferers were bedridden or in wheelchairs, medical treatment guidelines in the UK were changed regardless. However, persistent patient activists managed to obtain the raw data through repeated freedom of information (FOI) requests. Interestingly Queen Mary’s University, London, spent £200K challenging those requests, but lost the legal battle. When the data was re-analysed in 2016 minus the original scientific fudging, the true figures were barely better than no-treatment and ranged from 3% to 7%. Shame on you Queen Mary’s. Chalk that up to a win for the people. But at what cost and was the struggle really necessary?
Health journalist Jerome Burne’s latest blog delves into the ME/CFS saga much more deeply, but we raise the issue here because it’s symptomatic of what needs to change in the medical/scientific paradigm. Not least of all the ‘pharmascope’ – an incredibly apt term coined by Jerome – that seems to be gifted to doctors in med school blinding them to conditions that don’t require drugs to treat them.
The fact that the PACE trial got through both the Ethics Committee and the Medical Research Council, then was resoundingly accepted by the UK’s National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) with fudged data, demonstrates the monstrous flaws in the System. Add that to the healthcare crisis arising from putting conditions that don’t fit the existing medical model into the psychosomatic silo and you touch the tip of the medical negligence iceberg that no one dares discuss.
Possibly, but the PACErs are in a bunker, in another country, busy peer reviewing their own papers on why fans are an artifact of disordered mental processes best treated by graded running around therapy.I think that for the PACE authors and their ilk, the sh*t has now just about reached the fan.
They just might be heading for extradition.Possibly, but the PACErs are in a bunker, in another country, busy peer reviewing their own papers on why fans are an artifact of disordered mental processes best treated by graded running around therapy.
So they probably won't notice.
Article in 'Alliance for natural health' which appears to be selling 'natural products' (ie they appear to be promoting anti 'drug based' treatments). I haven't read all their blurb but no doubt someone will!
Nevertheless, good that Jerome's piece is being picked up and particularly criticism of the PACE trial
https://www.anhinternational.org/news/pharmascope-the-tool-that-may-have-blinded-your-doctor/
graded running around therapy.