Big news from Sweden: Fatigue diagnosis to be disappeared

I strongly believe that you need to be aware of these aspects too in order to be able to understand the research and the studies and the policy changes in their full context. It's all interconnected.
To understand the policy changes and their implications - absolutely. And I appreciate your effort to educate myself and others.

To understand the research and studies - much less so. If a study is inadequate, it’s inadequate regardless of the topic or the societal context of the topic. I don’t need the context to see the red flags.

Understanding the researcher’s agenda might make it easier to ignore their propaganda, but I’m a firm believer in the principle that any argument’s validity is dependent on the argument itself and not the person making the argument.

So understanding why they did a study is useful to understand the societal context, but not really for judging the merits of the findings.

I’m not saying that you agree or disagree with any of this. I’m just trying to say that my approach to combating e.g. a study is to go after the study itself and not the reason for the study. Therefore, I focus on the study and not the context surrounding it.
I'm really not trying to make a scientific argument about the recoveries or the treatments.
Apologies for taking it that way.
 
Last edited:
Trying to see this from high up, it seems that the idea is mainly about dropping rest as a therapeutic option, because it doesn't work for everyone, and instead going on a widespread implementation of active rehabilitation, which works for even fewer people, and will make lots worse. But it's likely assumed to be cheaper, as long as no one actually counts, because it can be done for cheap over a few weeks, or whatever.

I very much doubt that the 'ED' treatments are any effective, rather it's the flexible adaptation and rest that likely help most. Because rest is good for well-being and health, in good dosage. And this being a grab bag of various things without known causes, that's rather expected, but it will still help some. This is why vacations and week-ends exist, after all. If work was actually good for health, people who work the most and hardest would be the healthiest and live longer. And of course that's not the case at all, but that's inconvenient so entirely looked over.

But it's pretty much guaranteed that active rehabilitation and removing time off will fare worse overall, making the argument that rest doesn't work for everyone hypocritical and nonsensical, the numbers-to-treat and outcomes are atrocious, so this is likely why they pretend that there is no evidence at all, so they can do it all over again. The idea suffers from similar flaws as rest, but with additional problems tacked on. And of course it changes the 'therapy' from a passive thing, which is :(, to an active thing, which is ;). It feels like doing something. Even if that thing is mostly harmful. Which I guess is :thumbup: to them.

This is an idea that can't fail, it can only be failed. What absurd nonsense. However silly things are in the US right now, health care has always been just as much of a mess about problems they don't know how to deal with. They both pretty much look the same to me, same as what the UK is doing.
 
Another opinion piece in one of Sweden's largest newspaper, framing ED as a cultural illness potentially caused by toxic positivity.

Varför är alla moderna människor så sjukt trötta?
https://www.dn.se/kultur/sandra-stiskalo-varfor-ar-alla-moderna-manniskor-sa-sjukt-trotta/
Auto-translate said:
Why are all modern people so sick and tired?

Why are all modern people so morbidly tired?

Exhaustion disorder is disappearing as a diagnosis, but people will continue to be tired. This may well be due to toxic positivity, writes Sandra Stiskalo.

Say the one who is not tired. Being tired is commonplace. I - a layman, I might add - would even go so far as to say that tiredness is one of modernity's most distinctive states of mind.

So distinctive that in one of the world's most modern countries - but only here - there has been a separate diagnosis of crippling tiredness for 20 years. Every year, tens of thousands of people have been have been put on sick leave with exhaustion disorder, but in 2028 that will end. When Sweden adopts the WHO system, exhaustion disorder will disappear as a disease.

This may well be the first official sign of the incipient dismantling of the so-called diagnostic society.

Many have benefited: researchers, doctors, therapists, not to mention drug manufacturers.

Many have also been helped by it. For some, the very act of diagnosis - naming the condition - has been a relief in itself. Others have worn their diagnosis as a personal accessory, ‘an experience of pain that adds complexity and depth to their identity’, in the words of the idea historian Karin Johannisson.

In books and articles, she described psychosomatic diseases that arise and spread in interaction with culture, such as hysteria, neuroses, chronic pain and electrical allergies. She called them cultural diseases, and this has to include exhaustion disorder.

Of course, the removal of the diagnosis does not mean that the symptoms will disappear. People will continue to be sick and tired. The only question is why.

According to Korean-German philosopher Byung-Chul Han, widespread fatigue is caused by toxic positivity. Modern man is so violently positive that he becomes ill. Positive here is not to be confused with the attitude expressed in happy little shouts and benevolent smiles. No, to be in the grip of positivity is to constantly affirm, to be unable or unwilling to renounce and forsake. It is to repeatedly take on or be imposed new tasks, goals, visions and platforms, without dismantling the old ones. It is to be in a state of endless social and labour growth. It is multitasking, that hateful word and endeavour.

The history of literature has its own answers to cultural diseases like exhaustion and boredom. ‘I would prefer not to,’ replies the quiet civil servant Bartleby when his boss asks him to work. Herman Melville's 1853 short story ‘Bartleby the Printer’ cannot be reduced to a battle cry for civil disobedience. I am not saying that fatigue is solely the responsibility of the individual. But I do believe we are suffering from a lack of negativity.
 
Giorgio Grossi 1 2 3, Aleksander Perski 1 2, Walter Osika 3, Ivanka Savic 4 Stress-related exhaustion disorder--clinical manifestation of burnout? A review of assessment methods, sleep impairments, cognitive disturbances, and neuro-biological and physiological changes in clinical burnout. . Scand J Psychol. 2015 Dec;56(6):626-36. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12251.Epub 2015 Oct 23.

I think this review is quite interesting and gives a flavour of how the ED diagnosis has been used. They searched for research on ED and found about 50-60 useful articles, many of which were from about half a dozen Swedish groups. The equivalent figure for ME/CFS would presumably run into a thousand or more.

They say that ED is defined as work-related 'burnout'. The symptoms are then described as what is seen in burnout. They point out that ICD-10 recognises burnout as a social phenomenon but not as a medical condition. I suspect that in countries other than Sweden that line has been taken and burnout is distinguished from what is seen as a medical problem that might have been triggered by work - which broadly speaking would seem to cover reactive depressive illness, but also very likely cases of ME/CFS that have been wrongly attributed to overwork per se (clearly overwork could precipitate ME/CFS or turn a mild state into a worse one).

The symptom pattern described for ED is interesting because it seems to be a mix of reactive depressive features such as depersonalisation and sleep disorder of the insomnia rather than early morning waking (biologic depression) type. They also mention emotional lability and irritability, which are a bit difficult to know where to fit in.

As far as I can see this is considered a psychological diagnosis - pretty similar to the 'chronic fatigue' of White and Sharpe's Oxford criteria maybe. But it also appears that the name may have been taken to imply, at least for patients, a 'physical' problem of 'exhaustion', perhaps a bit like the way 'functional' is taken to mean something physical by patients.

That seems to bring us back to the debate we had about whether 'functional' is ever a useful term for patients and whether it should be revealed as the double-speak term it is. I guess that all this has played out in a slightly unusual (or best-end of spectrum maybe) state-run health service in Sweden - one that in the past has tended to be viewed very highly as compassionate and efficient.

I can see that this may well be a symptom of a political shift in Sweden, which like that in the UK, does not feel to be going in the right direction. How much changing a dubious name will contribute to that I wouldn't know but I suspect other forces will be more important.

All this will become irrelevant to people with ME/CFS if we can get some scientific answers. I am optimistic that we will but I realise that I don't have anything specific to back that up with just yet.
 
As far as I can see this is considered a psychological diagnosis - pretty similar to the 'chronic fatigue' of White and Sharpe's Oxford criteria maybe. But it also appears that the name may have been taken to imply, at least for patients, a 'physical' problem of 'exhaustion', perhaps a bit like the way 'functional' is taken to mean something physical by patients.
Yes, a psychiatric diagnosis (that includes physical symptoms).

I've never gotten the impression that they have tried to frame ED as a "functional" disorder. ED used to be called "utmattningsdepression" (literally "exhaustion depression") until 2003.

Thank you so much @Jonathan Edwards, for taking the time to share your thoughts on this, it is appreciated.
 
I am not saying that fatigue is solely the responsibility of the individual. But I do believe we are suffering from a lack of negativity.
I wonder what the BPS brigade would say about that take!
 
Another opinion piece in a very large newspaper.

”Avskaffad diagnos röjer ett haveri”
https://www.svd.se/a/kwzzPk/haveriu...yndrom-nu-avskaffas-skriver-isac-riddarsparre
Auto-translate said:
‘’Abolished diagnosis reveals a breakdown‘’

An investigation is needed to find the reasons why the National Board of Health and Welfare agreed to introduce the controversial diagnosis of exhaustion disorder. ‘It has never been a disease,’ writes resident Isac Riddarsparre.

In 2007, when Åsa Kadowaki's expert group at the National Board of Health and Welfare expressed scepticism about exhaustion disorder as a cause of long-term sick leave, the agency was accused of ‘promoting an anti-humanist ideology’. Now, as the diagnosis finally looks set to be abolished, she is vindicated almost 20 years later.

Exhaustion disorder was introduced as a kind of experimental diagnosis in 2005, pending research to confirm the existence of the disease. The idea was that prolonged stress linked to the workplace was a disease in itself. More than 20 years later, we can say that the experiment failed. More than 150,000 patients suffered harmful and often lengthy sick leave, and research has yet to prove a disease. The diagnosis will disappear in 2028, and the government should now launch an investigation to see what went wrong - to avoid repeating the mistake.

The diagnosis of exhaustion disorder is just the tip of the iceberg. Stress-related illness is the most common cause of long-term sick leave (sick leave beyond 60 days). Exhaustion disorder is indeed the most common diagnosis in this group, but several other diagnoses are used in sick leave cases with the same justification, i.e. that stressful work environments constitute illness. 86% of long-term sick leave for mental health problems in general can be traced to workplace problems.

When the diagnosis was introduced, exhaustion barely existed in the public consciousness. Only a hundred patients were put in sick-leave annually before the National Board of Health and Welfare changed the rules in 2008 following criticism. After that, sickness rates rose dramatically. In 2023 alone, there were 17,000 long-term sick leave diagnoses.

The healthcare system has minimal opportunities to actually address these problems. Doctors have few treatment options. There is no scientific support for CBT, for example. Medication does not remove a stressful work situation. Nor can a doctor order a patient to change jobs, reorganise his or her life, or tell colleagues at work to stop bullying the patient.

Sick leave, a common approach in this context, may alleviate the suffering for the time being - removing the difficult workplace - but it does not solve the underlying cause.

In fact, sick leave harms patients: the risk of suicide is eight times higher when sick leave is taken, and patients' economic prospects deteriorate. The real treatment - such as quitting your job and looking for a new one - risks being overlooked.

Anyone who has been stressed for a long time or who has even been on sick leave for exhaustion disorder may feel questioned by this text. That's why it's important to clarify: the suffering in a bad workplace is real. So is the anxiety, the insomnia, and the lack of energy.

But it is not a disease. These symptoms are unpleasant but normal bodily reactions to stress, just like the tears and anguish when a loved one passes away. And just because the suffering is normal doesn't mean the cure is obvious or easy. Changing jobs or reviewing one's life is a difficult process, but the individual is ultimately the only one who can do the work.

An investigation can find the root causes of why the National Board of Health and Welfare agreed to introduce a controversial diagnosis, and why the Swedish Social Insurance Agency allowed itself to be guided by a small group of doctors who happened to have the syndrome as their area of interest. A clearer distinction between illness and suffering would be helpful in healthcare, as would stronger requirements for scientific support in sick leave cases.

Sweden's workers deserve a healthcare system that supports and delivers good, effective treatments. Healthcare should not make its patients sicker than they are, through measures that turn normal human suffering into lengthy courses of illness. This is a huge disservice to the patient, no matter how good the initial intentions.
 
I have tried to articulate what I see happening on a broader scale right now in Sweden. I'm not sure if it comes across in the translation, as much depends on the language and the words that are used. Implications. But maybe?

”It feels like we have suddenly found ourselves in the middle of some kind of normalization process around the concept of cultural illness.”

Autotranslated blog:
https://mitteremitage-wordpress-com..._sl=sv&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=sv&_x_tr_pto=wapp
 
Another opinion piece in one of Sweden's largest newspaper, framing ED as a cultural illness potentially caused by toxic positivity.
Irony was already dead. They just dug its grave and treated it like a dead horse.

No matter how much you know how everyone is winging it, and people holding difficult jobs are all out of their depth, it never fully captures just how thoroughly out of their depth a lot of people are, while totally convinced they have such superior knowledge they can fully dispense with having to put in any more effort than lazily winging it.
According to Korean-German philosopher Byung-Chul Han, widespread fatigue is caused by toxic positivity. Modern man is so violently positive that he becomes ill. Positive here is not to be confused with the attitude expressed in happy little shouts and benevolent smiles. No, to be in the grip of positivity is to constantly affirm, to be unable or unwilling to renounce and forsake. It is to repeatedly take on or be imposed new tasks, goals, visions and platforms, without dismantling the old ones. It is to be in a state of endless social and labour growth. It is multitasking, that hateful word and endeavour.
The cringe level here is so high that I am going to become the Joker.

I guess that's one person who has never gone on the Internet, or ever left the room they were born in.
 
Last edited:
I have tried to articulate what I see happening on a broader scale right now in Sweden. I'm not sure if it comes across in the translation, as much depends on the language and the words that are used. Implications. But maybe?

”It feels like we have suddenly found ourselves in the middle of some kind of normalization process around the concept of cultural illness.”

Autotranslated blog:
https://mitteremitage-wordpress-com..._sl=sv&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=sv&_x_tr_pto=wapp
Thanks - can I assume what is fatigue syndrome in this translation is exhaustion disorder?
 
Long article in a big newspaper (includes a tiny bit about the research).

Expert: Total livsförändring behövs för att bryta utmattning
https://www.sydsvenskan.se/2025-04-02/expert-total-livsforandring-behovs-for-att-bryta-utmattning/
Auto-translate said:
Expert: Total life change needed to break exhaustion

You cannot accelerate and decelerate your way out of exhaustion. A total lifestyle change is needed, says psychotherapist and researcher Giorgio Grossi. ‘Good women need to learn to let go and let others do it their way.

Ingibjörg Jonsdottir, professor of public health, emphasises that it is difficult to heal as long as the overload remains. Society has a huge challenge to prevent mental illness, she says, and calls for greater investment in occupational health services.

In 2028, the classification for exhaustion disorder will disappear in Sweden, to adapt to the WHO's diagnostic system. But whatever the classification, Sweden, like other countries in Europe, has a major problem to deal with. Stress-related mental illness must be prevented, says Ingibjörg Jonsdottir, professor of public health at the University of Gothenburg and director of the Institute of Stress Medicine in Västra Götaland.

- ‘We can't have the situation that many women in particular have today. It's a gender equality issue. We need to see what we can do to prevent this and not get bogged down in just talking about classification,’ she says.

The disease has increased significantly in recent years and eighty per cent of those affected are women.

What happens in the brain in exhaustion disorder is that our emotional centre becomes more easily affected, while our ability to plan and be rational is impaired. These changes can be seen on magnetic resonance imaging. When we recover, the changes seem to go back, say the researchers the paper spoke to.

In exhaustion disorder, we have less power to do things. According to Giorgio Grossi, our ‘battery’ may only have 20 per cent of its normal power. So we need to make big lifestyle changes to use it properly.

Giorgio Grossi is a licensed psychotherapist and associate professor of medical psychology at the Stress Clinic in Stockholm and has written a number of books on the subject.

- Studies show that there are regions in the prefrontal cortex that experience reduced activity in people with exhaustion disorder. This is where we have our executive functions, logic, ability to plan, set goals and analyse. It is thinner in patients compared to healthy controls,’ he says.

- ‘At the same time, the amygdala is larger in volume, where we have our emotional centre. So it's harder to plan, and at the same time you become more sensitive and more impressionable. If you treat the exhausted, the differences seem to go back.

At the Institute of Stress Medicine, Ingibjörg Jonsdottir's research team has looked at the medical effects of fatigue.

- We have looked specifically at individuals who fulfil the criteria for exhaustion disorder. Many have significant symptoms that can be long-lasting. When challenged, the brain needs healthy systems, but we see that patients with exhaustion disorder have lower levels of growth factors that are important for nerve cell regeneration and survival,’ she says.

- ‘In some individuals, but not all, we see an increase in the brain damage marker NFL [neurofilament light] compared to healthy individuals. This suggests damage to the neurons. In long-term follow-up, it has gone back.

There is ongoing research comparing exhaustion and depression. The problem is that many people suffer from both. Many patients also have co-morbidity with other diagnoses and it is common in other conditions.

- You can think about symptom relief. If the symptoms are the same, they should be treated the same, regardless of the diagnosis. What is specific to these patients is that there is a cause that must be addressed. Otherwise, you risk continuing to be ill. You can't put a plaster cast on a strained leg and expect it to heal if the strain is still there,’ says Ingibjörg Jonsdottir.

She calls for an occupational health service that could take a greater grip on preventive work. ‘Occupational health services have both knowledge and the ability to adapt the workplace. At present, stress-related illnesses are dealt with by overburdened primary care clinics, which do not have the same conditions.

- It is a major problem that occupational health services are being defunded, because the problems are often workplace-related. They could have worked on factors that cause the problems.

Why are women predominantly affected?

- A fairly large proportion can be explained by unequal workloads. There are biological links to many diseases, such as rheumatism. But there is no research to suggest that the entire gender difference is due to biology,’ says Ingibjörg Jonsdottir.

- ‘We see gender differences in other mental health diagnoses too. This may be partly due to men being more reluctant to seek treatment.

At the adult psychiatry department at Helsingborg Hospital, consultant Marcus Persson explains that everyone with anxiety is helped in the same way, regardless of why they have anxiety.

The health centres normally deal with exhaustion disorders. Psychiatrists see people who have been referred for severe problems with sleep, appetite, anxiety and depression, for example.

- The diagnoses overlap. It is not dangerous to try antidepressants. Patients with depression as part of exhaustion disorder may also benefit from magnet therapy,’ he says.

Giorgio Grossi also emphasises that women's overwork is central to the problem. He has long experience of treating patients with severe exhaustion disorder. Nowadays, he often gives lectures to both psychotherapists and companies that need concrete advice to prevent their staff from ‘walking into the wall’.

This includes social factors, with the burden of responsibility for work, home and various relationships. The most affected occupations are health, education and social care, which are still female professions. The monthly fluctuations of hormones can also make some women more fragile and vulnerable.

- In the name of gender equality and in the service of health, there needs to be a much more equal distribution of responsibilities in the family. Men need to take on more responsibility, but good women also need to let go of responsibilities and let others do things their way. And not be there to nag,’ says Giorgio Grossi.

‘It's about a major lifestyle change in a situation where you have too much pressure, and that's not easy,’ he says.

- ‘You won't have a stress-free life, but you might be able to focus on what's important. Like taking care of yourself. You need to dare to break patterns and think carefully before saying yes.

According to Giorgio Grossi, there is often a co-morbidity between fatigue and GAD - generalised anxiety disorder. People with GAD often see problems and visualise difficult scenarios. They may be able to solve problems before others realise there has been one. Outwardly, these individuals are often just perceived as efficient and caring people who get a lot done.

You have written that there are other things that keep us sick than those that caused the exhaustion. What do you mean?

- You might get sick from clashing demands at work, scattered organisation and a fast pace. You are temporarily relieved from the stress of work when you are home on sick leave. But in your head you worry about what your colleagues are thinking, whether you'll ever get well and what will happen to your finances. It becomes a perpetuation pattern that keeps the bad mood going. You never get back on track.

Is there any medicine or treatment that can speed up recovery?

- If you suffer from pure exhaustion disorder, there is no scientific evidence that any treatment is superior to others. But they do work. Most treatments that have been tried are effective.

Exhaustion consists of three phases: the risk phase, the acute phase and the recovery phase. In the recovery phase, many people make the same mistakes, according to Giorgio Grossi.

Accelerating and braking.

Accelerating and braking.

On days you feel better, you carry on as usual. It drains your battery, so you become afraid to do anything at all.

- Then life becomes very restricted. You see yourself as fragile and lock yourself away. The longer you go on, the worse you feel.

When you're exhausted, you can do anything, but with a strategy. According to Mr Grossi, the structure of everyday life needs to be reorganised quite thoroughly. ‘If you have a good day and perhaps intend to cook, you have to stick to your plan, without fiddling with your mobile phone, picking around the house, watering the flowers and starting a washing machine.

- Otherwise you are completely exhausted and lie flat for the rest of the day without having cooked. You're ashamed, agonising and feeling sorry for yourself. On a better day, you have maybe twenty per cent of your battery. If you just keep going, you use it up in one go,’ he says.

- ‘If you break everything down into doses and constantly take breaks, you get things done, even if it takes a little longer in the beginning.

Eight tips for managing overload
  • - To overcome an unmanageable situation, you need a clear strategy. When you're exhausted, you can do anything, but according to a plan.

  • Don't think you're going to exercise as you usually do. Set the bar at the level you can handle on a bad day. You can do that every day. Raise it as you go.

  • Do one thing at a time.

  • Switch between different types of activities and different types of rest. Vary from body to mind, so you can recover. Active rest can be yoga or a walk.

  • Rest before you get tired.

  • Say no to things, both to yourself and others. This could mean leaving work on time or leaving the party after a few hours instead of in the early hours.

  • Dare to break patterns.

  • Let go of control and let others do things their way.
Source: Giorgio Grossi.
 
Interesting to see a completely make-believe account of the 'biology' of ED that is in some ways similar to the make-believe accounts of 'chronic fatigue' or BACME's ME/CFS. The sooner all problems are taken away from psychotherapists the better I think.

What I cannot quite make out is whether it is the same people pushing for the disappearance of the diagnosis who want more patients to be diagnosed with something they can get their hands on to 'advise'. Are we going to see a psychotherapy civil war?
 
Are we going to see a psychotherapy civil war?
That’s kind of what it seems like to me. At least I hope it will happen, then we can try to expose the ridiculousness of both sides.

Although civil wars often cause great suffering for the civilians (in this case the patients). So maybe I don’t want it to happen. I’m conflicted.
 
Back
Top Bottom