Big news from Sweden: Fatigue diagnosis to be disappeared

I was diagnosed with ”utmattningssyndrom” (exhaustion/burn out syndrome) for 11 years, before finally coming to Bragée ME-center and receiving the correct diagnosis: ME/CFS.

I received treatment for burn out (CBT and GET) and only got worse. It was, and still is, a trauma for me to have lived with the wrong diagnosis for so long. Despite my attempts to convince doctors that my symtoms did not fit burn out, no one ever listened.

I have met many ME-patients who, like me, were incorrectly diagnosed with burn out, because their GPs either didn’t know about, or didn’t believe ME/CFS is a real disease.

I don’t know how the disappearance of the ”utmattningssyndrom” diagnosis will play out. We will have to wait and see.

Because I am severe and struggling so much at the moment, I choose to hope that it will be a good thing.

I hope it will force doctors to find the correct diagnosis for patients who present with fatigue, instead of labeling them as being burned out and ordering harmful treatments.

(I do wonder, however, what patients with bona fide burn out will be diagnosed with?!)
 
It's only a bad thing if they do worse things instead. Which they will. That's been the only constant over the last few decades: however bad things are, you can always count on proponents of this ideology to make everything worse. It never fails. The only times things improve slightly is when their stuff is pushed back a little. But their fantasy models are political, and fiscally, very desirable, so things are pretty much guaranteed to be worse.

For sure the concept is bogus, and in itself it should be a good thing. But since we know they will do worse things with this change, ah well.

It'd be funny if the consequences weren't so tragic, but the way it's defined rather explicitly and yet being applied in such a generic way that:
because the diagnostic criteria are relatively broad and vague and can cover many types of illness and disease
This is similar to how no system of government can withstand corruption from the top. It's impossible to create a system that will not fall to rot and corruption from corrupt leaders, the only way to avoid this is to not elect corrupt people. Which is impossible. It's written to be about stress, so that when no such stress is present but a clinician is compelled to make the diagnosis, they will simply assert it on their own. It supports itself, this ideology is textbook bootstrapping: the impossible fact of elevating oneself by pulling on our own bootstraps.

It's all so very telling that all those concepts have proven to be a massive failure with Long Covid, and the almost universal response has been to make things worse. There is never any line they won't cross, including encouraging mass assisted suicide in people who are only disabled because or government policies supported by the medical profession. These institutions are disgustingly perverse and immoral.

What this is is basically the farmers and the butchers negotiating how they will handle the pigs, who are obviously not involved in any such discussion, and aren't meant to be.
 
This is extremely dangerous. It’s what leads to lives being destroyed.
And it has been proven again and again and again and again that they want this. All of this is on purpose, they simply don't care about the consequences because they themselves never face any. Only we do, and they are fine with that. We have been classified as sub-humans with everything it involves.
 
I just want to clarify my current stance on this:

I agree with them that ‘burnout’ is an unnecessary diagnosis. It’s broad, vague and just another way to dismiss patients.

But I do not, in any way, agree with their reasoning about e.g. unhelpful beliefs and the proposed treatments. They are completely wrong and incredibly harmful.

Because we don’t have a good understanding of the causes of fatigue to offer up as an alternative, I believe that we have to focus on the flaws of their reasoning and their conflicts of interest. That’s an uphill battle, but I don’t think we’re going to get anywhere by trying to defend the ‘burnout’ diagnosis.

PS. If it’s wrong to call it ‘burnout’, please tell me. I find it easier to use because other nationalities understand the meaning as opposed to ‘exhaustion/fatigue syndrome’.
 
That’s an uphill battle, but I don’t think we’re going to get anywhere by trying to defend the ‘burnout’ diagnosis.

I agree. Although I see the BPS forces weighing in on political decisions that at present in many countries are going in very much the wrong direction I also see all sorts of inconsistencies building up in the debate. As Richard points out the same people who have said there is no physical disease it is all in the mind are now saying that there is too much diagnosing of all in the mind and people are just ... (fill in as preferred). If there is nobody being diagnosed with anything that is bad for business if you believe your calling is treating people with (fill in as preferred).

I think all of this may fall apart. And maybe the science will move forward. In the meantime if fewer people are sent to rehab centres for stress-induced exhaustion syndrome it may be no bad thing.
 
News article + audio segment (1 min, in Swedish).

Därför försvinner utmattningssyndrom som diagnos
https://www.svt.se/nyheter/inrikes/darfor-forsvinner-utmattningssyndrom-som-diagnos
Auto-translate said:
Why exhaustion disorder is disappearing as a diagnosis

Published today 21:03

Around 20,000 people go on sick leave every year for exhaustion disorder. But from 2028, the diagnosis will disappear when Sweden introduces the World Health Organisation's (WHO) updated diagnostic system.

The diagnosis of exhaustion disorder only exists in Sweden, but it will now be removed until 2028, when the World Health Organisation's (WHO) new and medically updated diagnostic system ICD-11 will be introduced.

- ‘We follow it in Sweden because we want an international standard to be able to describe health in a common way,’ says Magdalena Fresk, Head of the Classifications and Terminology Unit at the National Board of Health and Welfare.

Sees no risks

Every year, around 20,000 people are put on sick leave for exhaustion disorder, mainly women. The National Board of Health and Welfare, which manages the classification system in Sweden, currently sees no risk of patients being affected when the diagnosis disappears. But they will monitor developments.

- ‘We have identified a number of areas where we need to investigate further how this change will affect healthcare and patients, and this is one of the areas that is highly prioritised,’ says Fresk.

Hear from the National Board of Health and Welfare on why the diagnosis is disappearing and how patients will be affected in the future.
 
Marie Åsberg, 86: Därför har jag vigt livet åt att bekämpa utmattningssyndrom
https://vision.se/tidningenvision/a...vigt-livet-at-att-bekampa-utmattningssyndrom/

Google Translate, English ("Marie Åsberg, 86: This is why I have dedicated my life to fighting exhaustion disorder")

Author Hedvig Söderlund comments on this in an Instagram post, and to me this is exactly what it is about: the care and support that has helped so many get their life back and return to work, is now suddenly discontinued because the people in power have decided that it's costing too much money.
Hedvig Söderlund auto-translate said:
There is a lot of talk right now about the disappearance of the diagnostic code exhaustion disorder - this excellent term for what a huge number of people, especially women, suffer from every year. Marie Åsberg is the psychiatrist who introduced the term in the early 2000s, and her analysis of who is affected and what the situation is, both historically and internationally, is astute and spot on.

But some time ago, the help that was actually available began to be dismantled. Specialised clinics that had helped so many of us were closed, folded up shop and shut down, we can't spend this much money on the care of women, let them be taken care of by primary care instead (who doesn't know anything about this).

And now even the diagnosis itself is to be removed. Instead, there is talk of acute stress reaction or adjustment disorder. Acute? It's not acute at all, it's an accumulation of chronic stress over several years that has settled in the body and brain. Adjustment disorder? Adaptation to what? It is perfectly normal to react with collapse and total exhaustion when you have been under constant stress for several years, and finally the system says no.

One of the arguments in favour of its removal is that the diagnosis is unique to Sweden and we need to adapt to international standards. But why should we when we are right? Sweden is a pioneer in many areas: parental leave, paternity leave and our unique sex legislation - which criminalises buying sex but not selling it. All three excellent systems where we have been and ARE at the forefront. In my opinion, it is exactly the same with exhaustion disorder. Why should we adapt to countries that are not as advanced as we are?

Other countries talk about burnout, and focus on overload at work. In Sweden, we have developed the definition (and diagnosis) to also include leisure time. It is about insufficient recovery in general, due to overload both at work and privately. It's an excellent diagnosis, and removing it and destroying everything that has been built up means that we are taking a big step backwards. In a way, it follows the general trend in the world where women's rights are now going backwards. It is extremely sad and will have enormous consequences both personally and socially. I think there will be a huge backlash from this, with thousands of people (women) falling through the cracks and not getting the help they so badly need and should get. A tragedy.
 
ME and post-covid are mentioned and framed as "cultural illnesses" in this one.

Also, Petra Widerkrantz is infamous for having been very influential in creating new BPS-leaning regional clinical guidelines for ME in Skåne and more.

Experterna oeniga när diagnos för utmattning slopas
https://www.sydsvenskan.se/2025-03-26/experterna-oeniga-nar-diagnos-for-utmattning-slopas/
Auto-translate said:
Experts disagree as diagnosis for fatigue is cancelled

In a a couple of years, the diagnosis of exhaustion disorder will disappear, in line to the WHO. ‘Idiotic’, says Dr Giorgio Grossi, who trains both psychotherapists and companies on the subject. General practitioner Petra Widerkrantz who is a medical adviser at Region Skåne, wants the diagnosis cancelled immediately. She herself has avoided it for many years. It became like a ‘rubbish bin’, she says.

Even if exhaustion disorder disappears as a diagnosis, the problems will remain. Opinions are divided on what the change means for patients.

In 2028, Sweden will introduce the World Health Organisation's (WHO) updated diagnostic system. The diagnosis of exhaustion disorder, which is unique to Sweden, will then disappear. One proposal for a replacement diagnosis is adjustment disorder, but this has not yet been decided.

For patients, it should change essentially nothing. Treatments will continue and people can still talk about exhaustion, even if the diagnosis is different. But among experts, there are conflicting reactions to the change.

Giorgio Grossi, who is an associate professor of medical psychology and a licensed psychotherapist with extensive experience in treating patients with severe exhaustion disorder, believes that the diagnosis needs to remain.

- ‘I think it's idiotic to remove it. The rest of the WHO should instead embrace the disorder. The Netherlands, which like Sweden is at the forefront of tackling stress-related fatigue, is in the process of developing national criteria that are very similar to our diagnosis of exhaustion disorder,’ he says.

‘When I worked clinically, I tried to avoid the diagnosis - it became like a rubbish bin,’ says general practitioner Petra Widerkrantz, medical adviser for Region Skåne.

General practitioner Petra Widerkrantz, medical adviser to Region Skåne, recently suggested in the journal Allmänmedicin that the diagnosis should be avoided today. She hasn't worked with patients for nine years, but even then she avoided the diagnosis.

Apart from alignment with the WHO, what do you think is the benefit of dropping the diagnosis?

- One of the difficulties with the diagnosis is that anyone can fulfil the diagnostic criteria. It is not clear how big a problem you need to have to get help. It's sloppy. I wanted to understand what the patient needed to get back to a qualitative life. Then the diagnosis does not help many.

Long periods of sick leave are a common effect of exhaustion disorder in Sweden. According to Petra Widerkrantz, there are no scientific studies on brain damage or impairment that can be used as a diagnostic criterion.

- ‘The danger is that you make patients passive,’ she says.

Research shows that people with exhaustion disorder have increased activity and a larger volume of the amygdala and a thinner prefrontal cortex. This means that the emotional centre becomes larger and more active, while the decision-making, logic and planning centres become smaller.

The risk with the diagnosis of exhaustion disorder and long periods of sick leave is that the patient becomes passive, according to Petra Widerkrantz.

Isn't it true that the brain centres for emotions are getting bigger and those for logic are getting thinner?

- The same change can also be seen in many other conditions. Moreover, when I meet the patient, I don't know what's going on in their brain. As a doctor, you need to be curious about who the person in front of you is. You have to be careful with the long periods of sick leave. Life is put on hold and there are so many things in life that are linked to work ability,’ says Petra Widerkrantz.

‘My hope is that it will become clearer what needs to be done for the patient.

Why is the diagnosis of adjustment disorder better?

- ‘It points to difficulties in coping with the amount of stress you are under. This means that something in your life needs to change. It may force the doctor to take a stand. We can continue to call it exhaustion, but we should not diagnose everyone with exhaustion disorder. It is not the same disease that needs the same treatment. My hope is that it will become clearer what needs to be done for the patient,’ says Petra Widerkrantz.

Consultant psychiatrist Marcus Persson meets patients with different diagnoses at the psychiatric department at Helsingborg Hospital.

Consultant psychiatrist Marcus Persson at the psychiatric department at Helsingborg Hospital believes that a new diagnosis can be better than the old one, but for different reasons.

- People think that diagnoses are set in stone, but this is not the case. Our diagnoses are based on a combination of different symptoms. The diagnosis of adjustment disorder says a little more clearly that it is difficult for the individual to adapt to a situation,’ he says.

Diagnoses often include elements such as sleep problems, poor appetite, anxiety and depression. Therefore, some diagnoses can become very common for a period, while others disappear, so-called cultural diseases. What we now call exhaustion disorder, he says, may be the same as earlier diagnoses such as oral galvanism, electrical allergy, ME (chronic fatigue syndrome) or even post-covid.

- Some people's strategies don't work as well as others'. Then they end up with the diagnosis that's in at the moment. It changes all the time,’ he says.

Diagnoses are not set in stone. They are often a combination of different symptoms, according to consultant Marcus Persson. The new diagnosis of adjustment disorder is more accurate than the old one, he says.

But how do you see the changes in the brain?

- The astronauts who just came from the space station have atrophied muscles. If someone goes from working to lying around looking at the ceiling, it would be strange not to find changes in the brain. The question is whether there is a causal link between brain change and disease or is it because of a change in behaviour.

There is a labour market that is failing, that is organised in such a way that it produces exhaustion.

Could the change in diagnosis be about who should take responsibility for the condition? A question of blame, pure and simple.

- Yes, exhaustion means that anyone would get sick in this situation, while adjustment disorder is about this particular person not functioning in this situation. It's a bit more accurate. You can find articles from the 1970s about the unreasonable work situation. People have always been stressed,’ says Marcus Persson.

Dr Giorgio Grossi works at the Stress Clinic in Stockholm: ‘A lot of the stress that generates fatigue comes from outside,’ he says.

It is precisely who is responsible for the exhaustion that Giorgio Gross wants to keep the diagnosis.

- There are workplaces that are understaffed with poor organisation and leadership and conflicting demands. Look at how teachers can be completely overloaded with work, in an organisation that is supposed to deliver services that make parents happy. They are also often blamed for parents not getting their children to bed on time. Then it's the teachers‘ fault if the pupils’ grades are not satisfactory,’ he says and continues:

- ‘There is a labour market that is failing, that is organised in such a way that it produces exhaustion. A lot of the stress that generates exhaustion comes from outside.

Record number of people sick from stress

The number of ongoing stress-related sick leaves increased from 34 700 to 43 500 between spring 2019 and spring 2024, an increase of 25% and a new high for ongoing stress-related sick leaves. In November 2024, the number of ongoing sickness cases due to stress totalled just over 47,300. This is according to figures from the Swedish Social Insurance Agency.

The agency's analysis shows that women run more than twice the risk of sick leave due to stress-related mental illness compared to men.

Many women work in high-risk occupations in the welfare sector with poor working conditions in health, education and social care. Women also take more responsibility than men for children and the home.

The risk of sickness absence due to stress-related mental illness rises markedly in the 25-29 age group and remains higher until the age of 45, with a peak in the 30-39 age group.

Source: Swedish Social Insurance Agency.
 
Därför slopas diagnosen utmattningssyndrom – 7 frågor och svar
https://www.hd.se/2025-03-26/darfor-slopas-diagnosen-utmattningssyndrom-7-fragor-och-svar/
Auto-translate said:
Why the diagnosis of exhaustion disorder is discontinued - 7 questions and answers

Exhaustion disorder is being removed as a separate diagnosis by the National Board of Health and Welfare. What does this mean? Here are seven questions and answers.

Tens of thousands of Swedes, mainly women, are on sick leave every year for exhaustion disorder. Now the diagnosis is disappearing.

It was recently revealed that exhaustion disorder is not included in the Swedish translation of the updated international classification system of diagnoses that the World Health Organisation, WHO, is behind. Sweden has had the diagnosis as the only country in the world since 2005.

Why doesn't the WHO want the diagnosis to be used in Sweden?

- ‘There is a need for an international standard without so many national versions. Otherwise, the data reported cannot be compared. The system exists for statistics, analysis and research and should work for all countries,’ says Magdalena Fresk, Head of the Classifications and Terminology Unit at the National Board of Health and Welfare.

Why can't the Swedish diagnosis be used in all other countries?

- ‘There is a possibility to make suggestions, but then it is necessary that it comes from more than one country. I don't rule out changes to the classification in the future if the diagnosis needs to be included. But then we need international consensus.

What does the change mean for people diagnosed with exhaustion disorder?

- If you are ill, there is no need to worry. You can still have this diagnosis and be on sick leave. The classification does not control that. But we want to make sure that people don't fall through the cracks and will therefore provide support to the healthcare system and the Swedish Social Insurance Agency ahead of the change.

So the diagnosis will still be available after the change?

- ‘Yes, you can still get the diagnosis from the healthcare system even if it is not included in our classification system. It is not a manual on how to make diagnoses. In this respect, we refer to agreed diagnostic criteria in the healthcare system.

Will the change affect the treatment of people with exhaustion disorder?

- The National Board of Health and Welfare classification does not affect treatment. It is for the healthcare system to decide.

What diagnosis will be used instead of exhaustion disorder in your system?

- You can use the code that is closest. For example, it could be what is called ‘other specified responses to stress’. There may be other ways to describe it, but I cannot answer that now. We want to look into it properly and will produce guidance in due course. In 2025, the Swedish translation will be finalised. In our registers, the system will start to be used from 2028.

But doesn't this mean that it will be difficult to follow up on previous statistics on the number of cases with the diagnosis?

- Yes, that is the downside. Here we need to be clear and help with which new code the healthcare system should use. Everyone must do the same,’ says Magdalena Fresk.
 
ME and post-covid are mentioned and framed as "cultural illnesses" in this one.

Also, Petra Widerkrantz is infamous for having been very influential in creating new BPS-leaning regional clinical guidelines for ME in Skåne and more.

Experterna oeniga när diagnos för utmattning slopas
https://www.sydsvenskan.se/2025-03-26/experterna-oeniga-nar-diagnos-for-utmattning-slopas/
Damn this is a mess. I get the same vibes from observing those 'experts' at work as any of those "kitchen nightmares" shows would, if I ever watched one. They're struggling with making water boil and how to toast bread without starting a fire.

Our lives are in these people's hands? I'm sorry but this is a completely unacceptable status quo. Our lives aren't ruined mainly by illness, they are ruined by staggering levels of incompetence and institutional dysfunction.
 
Why doesn't the WHO want the diagnosis to be used in Sweden?

- ‘There is a need for an international standard without so many national versions. Otherwise, the data reported cannot be compared.
But. They're literally the ones rejecting this international standard, sulking and stomping their feet about how it's the international standard that should bow to them.

WTF? You can't tell me that a bunch of teenagers doing the same job would do significantly worse here, it's just not realistic. They are so completely out of their depth that they don't notice just how out of their depth they are. It's like they're walking around in circles and insisting that they're on the right path because they keep regularly seeing the same trees as they loop around.
 
Opinion piece today in one of the biggest Swedish newspapers/websites. It's currently at the top of the "most read" page. (Mentions neurasthenia and cultural illnesses, but not ME.)

Diagnosen försvinner – men alla utmattade då?
https://www.aftonbladet.se/kultur/a/KM7GR4/fanny-nilsson-om-utmattningssyndrom
Auto-translate said:
Diagnosis disappears - but what about the exhausted ones?

Evaluating a concept is not the same as questioning suffering

Are there mental psychiatric diagnoses? A pointed question that is once again topical because exhaustion disorder will disappear from the Swedish diagnostic register.

What the hell is this? And what does it mean for all the exhausted people who have collapsed, become bedridden and then registered as sick under diagnosis code F43.8A? Those who have burnt out, walked into the dreaded wall. What will happen to them now?

To answer that question, we need to go back to the origins of the diagnosis. In August Prize-winning psychiatrist Christian Rück's book ‘Unhappy in Paradise’ (2020), the story goes like this:

In the late 1990s, a researcher noticed that long-term sick leave and the diagnosis of depression were increasing in Sweden. He went to the grand old lady of Swedish psychiatry, the internationally pioneering depression professor Marie Åsberg. This couldn't be right, Åsberg thought - why would so many people suddenly become depressed?

The researchers convened a group and studied 100 civil servants on sick leave. Most of them had depression, but something was off. They thought they saw something else. A fatigue, stress intolerance more than depression.

A few years later, Åsberg and others were commissioned by the National Board of Health and Welfare to produce a report on how to tackle the increase in sick leave. The group proposed a new diagnosis: exhaustion disorder. Two years later, in 2005, the National Board of Health and Welfare adopted the idea. In the Swedish translation of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD), exhaustion disorder was added as a subgroup to F43.8 Other specified reactions to severe stress.

Exhaustion disorder is unique, because this is not how it usually happens. For new diagnoses to be created, good studies are needed on what distinguishes the condition from others, which has never really been presented for exhaustion disorder. The diagnosis only exists in Sweden. But nevertheless, it has become the most common code on sickness certificates to the Swedish Social Insurance Agency.

The problem with a diagnosis that only exists in one country, and that is not based on scientific evidence, is that it becomes difficult to research. This has also been the case with exhaustion. Initially it was thought that long sick leave was required, but now it is discouraged. There was a perception in the scientific community, which was passed on to patients, that something had changed biologically, broken down, in the brains of exhausted people. This could never be proven. There are few studies, and no clearly helpful treatment.

The diagnosis has therefore been criticised over the years by Swedish general practitioners who see the tired, sad and exhausted. Those who go through crisis reactions, deaths, divorces and difficult working conditions and sort of collapse.

This cannot be emphasised enough: questioning and evaluating diagnoses is not questioning suffering. Suffering is the only thing that is real. But the diagnoses themselves, the labels, exist because we create them. Doctors and psychologists interpret different symptoms and put them together to form a profile that they think rings something treatable.

Mental health diagnoses change with the times in a different way than physical diagnoses do, because they can never be diagnosed with blood tests or X-rays. And strong reactions to stress have always existed. In a fine text about the remarkable physician Ernst Westerlund, who gave his name to the fragrant potted plant Dr Westerlund, each new generation of doctors is encouraged to look backwards to understand their contemporaries.’

‘At the turn of the last century, the ‘miracle doctor’ Westerlund was the town doctor in Enköping, where people travelled from all over the country to see him. At that time, the diagnosis of neurasthenia, nervous weakness, was widespread and, like exhaustion disorder, it was more common among women in the upper classes than among labourers. Dr Westerlund became famous for his success in curing them.

With a keen interest in the patient's whole life, and by never questioning the symptoms, sufferers took a great liking to the doctor. His individualised treatments included activities such as caring for others, manual labour in the fields around the city or spending time in nature.

Ernst Westerlund was careful to emphasise that the symptoms were not imaginary, but he encouraged patients not to focus on them. ‘To rest is to do something else’ was one of his mottos. Coherence and meaning were important, and his ‘regimen therapy’ included not only routines around eating, sleeping and working, but also socialising with others. Westerlund is now seen as a leading figure in occupational therapy, and his methods are similar to what is known as third-wave CBT: ACT, acceptance commitment therapy, which, with its mindfulness ideas, has similarities with thousands of years of life advice from Buddhism.

Through her important work, the historian of ideas Karin Johannisson has taught us the word cultural diseases. Neurasthenia fell into oblivion, and other diagnoses took its place. When the now 86-year-old psychiatry professor Marie Åsberg is interviewed in the podcast The Last Pill, she says: ‘We still don't know what we should and would like to know about these diseases’, adding: ‘if they are diseases’.

No, what exactly is sick - is it nerves, society, patriarchy? We have no definite answers, and each individual has their own story, as Dr Westerlund saw.

Many people will be stressed, sad and tired in their lives, and today's doctors have to enter a diagnosis code in the medical record if you seek treatment. In the ICD manual, the chapter F43 Adjustment disorders and reaction to severe stress is close at hand, with, for example, 43.0 Acute stress reaction or 43.2 Adjustment disorder, which many will probably use instead.

A close relative of mine has been on long-term sick leave for periods of time over the years, she herself has described it as exhaustion. She was in ACT-style group therapy for exhaustion disorder, a treatment that was later discontinued because there was no scientific evidence. But it helped her. She bought a dog. She went for long walks. She took SSRIs and sleeping pills. She tended her houseplants, including a magnificent two-metre tall Dr Westerlund. Over the years, panic attacks, and especially health anxiety, crystallised, which she now understands and can manage. Now she has landed in a job she loves and recently expressed amazement at her work capacity. Memory, organisation, efficiency! ‘My brain isn't broken at all,’ she declared in amazement. What she had long thought of herself - as an exhausted person with a nervous system that would never be whole - turned out not to be true.

Many doctors have emphasised that the diagnosis of exhaustion disorder is too vague, and that treatment studies have therefore failed. Behind the diagnosis are a host of unique life stories and circumstances. The misnomer ‘mental illness’ is not helpful either. Behind the anxiety, fatigue, pain, depression, sleep problems, there is everything from severe psychiatric diagnoses to life with tough circumstances.

After 20 years of F43.8A, it's time for something new. Perhaps we can gain a more nuanced understanding of the suffering of the soul, and the many different ways to get back on track, in the spirit of Dr Westerlund.

I ask my previously exhausted friend about the fact that what she identified with will now disappear. ‘At first I thought: But that was real! What am I now?’. She says that it felt good to talk about herself as exhausted, as it was less stigmatised than, for example, depression, which can be interpreted as being too ambitious. ‘But’, she says after a while, “it's really just a word”.

There's an interesting discussion happening on the writer's Bluesky page:
https://bsky.app/profile/fnyosv.bsky.social/post/3lllbwirczc2i
 
Last edited:
Opinion piece today in one of the biggest Swedish newspapers/websites. It's currently at the top of the "most read" page. (Mentions neurasthenia and cultural illnesses, but not ME.)

Diagnosen försvinner – men alla utmattade då?
https://www.aftonbladet.se/kultur/a/KM7GR4/fanny-nilsson-om-utmattningssyndrom


There's an interesting discussion happening on the writer's Bluesky page:
https://bsky.app/profile/fnyosv.bsky.social/post/3lllbwirczc2i
I’m a bit foggy at the moment, but the english translation of that opinion piece reads to me like a whole bunch of nothing. I really don’t get what her point is?
 
I’m a bit foggy at the moment, but the english translation of that opinion piece reads to me like a whole bunch of nothing. I really don’t get what her point is?
The main thing I'm left with after reading, are the many hints to the conceptual model suggesting that some illnesses and diseases aren't really medical issues at all but just "difficult but normal life experiences" that everyone goes though. Implying that sick leave and medical treatments isn't what is needed, but for people to suck it up, keep on pushing through and find other ways to find meaning in their lives, other things to identify themselves with than a diagnosis or a set of symptoms.

But that's just my personal impression. Not saying that's the message the writer is trying to get across. But it's a very common theme nowadays here in Sweden, it seems.
 
Back
Top Bottom