Article: It’s official: When journals behave badly, there could be some punishment

Andy · Dec 19, 2017

Here at Retraction Watch, we constantly receive emails from readers who are frustrated with a particular journal — perhaps it has ignored obvious problems in a published paper, performed only a cursory peer review, or takes months (or years) to take action on a problematic article.

Many whistleblowers bring their concerns to the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), which provides guidelines for best practices in publishing. But sometimes, those same whistleblowers complain to us that there aren’t adequate punishments for journals that ignore allegations or maintain improper practices — and COPE, though an important standard-bearer for the industry, lacks teeth.

Did you know COPE can revoke a journal’s membership if it doesn’t uphold the organization’s ethical standards? This has always been possible, and a recently released COPE statement about its sanctions policy has tried to clarify its position. We spoke with COPE co-chairs Geri Pearson and Chris Graf about this and other recently announced changes.
Click to expand...

https://retractionwatch.com/2017/12/19/official-journals-behave-badly-punishment/

I doubt we should get out hopes up about the Lancet getting any punishment though.

Adrian · Dec 19, 2017

Andy said: ↑

https://retractionwatch.com/2017/12/19/official-journals-behave-badly-punishment/

I doubt we should get out hopes up about the Lancet getting any punishment though.
Click to expand...

Psychological Medicine who published the PACE recovery paper aren't members of COPE

Log in or Sign up

Article: It’s official: When journals behave badly, there could be some punishment

Andy Committee Member & Outreach

Adrian Administrator Staff Member

Share This Page

Log in or Sign up

Article: It’s official: When journals behave badly, there could be some punishment

Andy Committee Member & Outreach

Adrian Administrator Staff Member

Share This Page

Useful Searches