1. Guest, the 'News in Brief' for the week beginning 29th June 2020 is here.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Welcome! To read the Core Purpose and Values of our forum, click here.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Guest, the DecodeME study has announced £3.2m of funding, click here to read about it.
    Dismiss Notice

retraction watch

  1. ladycatlover
    Thread

    ‘We badly need to change processes’: How ‘slow, opaque and inconsistent’ journals’ responses to misconduct can be, Nov 2019, Retraction Watch

    ‘We badly need to change processes’: How ‘slow, opaque and inconsistent’ journals’ responses to misconduct can be. Two researchers from Japan —...
    Thread by: ladycatlover, Nov 29, 2019, 2 replies, in forum: Health News and Research unrelated to ME/CFS
  2. Andy
    Thread

    “We regret our delay:” PLOS ONE retracts two papers [for image problems]

    PLOS ONE has retracted two papers for image problems, which we’ve learned were brought to the journal’s attention more than four years ago. The...
    Thread by: Andy, Jan 16, 2019, 1 replies, in forum: Health News and Research unrelated to ME/CFS
  3. Andy
    Thread

    A university went to great lengths to block the release of information about a trial gone wrong. A reporter fought them and revealed the truth.

    Sorry, not PACE. Here’s a story that shows the lengths a public university — The University of Illinois at Chicago — went to block the release...
    Thread by: Andy, Jul 3, 2018, 6 replies, in forum: Health News and Research unrelated to ME/CFS
  4. Andy
    Thread

    Article: It’s official: When journals behave badly, there could be some punishment

    Here at Retraction Watch, we constantly receive emails from readers who are frustrated with a particular journal — perhaps it has ignored obvious...
    Thread by: Andy, Dec 19, 2017, 1 replies, in forum: Health News and Research unrelated to ME/CFS
Showing results 1 to 4 of 4