Arnie Pye
Senior Member (Voting Rights)
Title : Are Regulatory Bodies Prioritising Drug Company Interests Over Public Safety?
Subtitle : The Disturbing Case of the Street Drug Ketamine
https://www.madinamerica.com/2019/1...ng-drug-company-interests-over-public-safety/
Article continues at : https://www.madinamerica.com/2019/1...ng-drug-company-interests-over-public-safety/
I think the answer to the question posed in the title is "Yes, most definitely".
The comments are mostly worth reading, too.
Subtitle : The Disturbing Case of the Street Drug Ketamine
https://www.madinamerica.com/2019/1...ng-drug-company-interests-over-public-safety/
The UK’s Medicines & Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency [MHRA] is refusing to respond to the concerns of psychiatrists, parliamentarians, patients and other experts about the impending licensing of the street drug ketamine as a treatment for depression.
In March this year, the USA’s Food and Drug Administration approved Spravato (esketamine), on the basis of just one efficacy study.
On 17.10.19 the European Medicines Agency [EMA] issued a ‘positive opinion’ recommending the granting of marketing authorisation for esketamine for depression in adults and sent it to the European Commission, which has 67 days to make a final decision (December 23).
The MHRA (UK) has deferred a decision, pending the EMA/EC ruling. However, during the 67 days, member states can submit new information not addressed by the EMA opinion.
On 31.10.19 twelve experts, including eight psychiatrists, wrote to the MHRA and EMA.
Article continues at : https://www.madinamerica.com/2019/1...ng-drug-company-interests-over-public-safety/
I think the answer to the question posed in the title is "Yes, most definitely".
The comments are mostly worth reading, too.