Why are so many FND zealots on this author list? To my knowledge, they’ve contributed little to nothing in bolstering understanding of the disease. How familiar would they be with the evidence base and controversy? All strange
This might already have been responded to--I haven't read the whole thread. They are completely in bed with the PACE team and the rest--the leading FND experts, Jon Stone and Alan Carson, studied under Prof Sharpe in Edinburgh, as I understand it, and are now close colleagues. The FND people have a huge stake in this debate. This is why I have been trying to point out their constant misinterpretation of prevalence rates and other stunts they have tried to pull with their data. The fields are intimately connected.