1. Guest, 'News in Brief' for the week beginning 14th September 2020 is here.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Welcome! To read the Core Purpose and Values of our forum, click here.
    Dismiss Notice

Action for ME has joined S4ME

Discussion in 'General ME/CFS News' started by April, Mar 12, 2018.

Tags:
  1. April

    April Established Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    33
    Likes Received:
    276
    This thread has been split from this thread

    Afme joined this forum a few days ago.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 13, 2018
    Louie41, Inara, adreno and 4 others like this.
  2. guest001

    guest001 Guest

    Not happy with this at all. Perverse decision. Do I stay or do I go?
     
    Louie41, Inara, ladycatlover and 2 others like this.
  3. Indigophoton

    Indigophoton Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    849
    Likes Received:
    9,763
    Location:
    UK
    @Lilpink since you're pondering out loud, as it were, what's not to like about AfME choosing to join a science-based forum? It seems a positive thing to me. Especially if they engage. And if they don't, but simply read, then it's surely good that they are exposed to the views of all patients?
     
    MeSci, Simone, Emsho and 30 others like this.
  4. guest001

    guest001 Guest

    Imo AfME are part of the problem, have colluded with the BPS paradigm and should be removed. If they didn't exist I'd be happy.

    I don't know why we condescend to them...
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 13, 2018
    Louie41, Inara, Awol and 6 others like this.
  5. Jonathan Edwards

    Jonathan Edwards Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    7,452
    Likes Received:
    76,252
    I agree with @Indigophoton. There is no condescension involved (probably not the right word anyway). I for one would very much like AfME to read everything I say on this forum, in the hope that they will see the real scientific debate. Shutting people out seems to me like admitting weakness and we have no need for that.
     
  6. Sly Saint

    Sly Saint Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    5,103
    Likes Received:
    42,306
    Location:
    UK
    frowned upon/discouraged on their own patient forum

    eta: they have been members of PR for a while
    eta2: but they haven't posted there since 2016
     
    Last edited: Mar 13, 2018
    Simone, Louie41, Inara and 8 others like this.
  7. guest001

    guest001 Guest

    I don't agree with that pov, and many of my fellow sufferers agree with me. Obviously most of them don't inhabit this forum. I think if this is the majority feeling of this forum it's not for me.
     
    Louie41, Inara, Awol and 3 others like this.
  8. Valentijn

    Valentijn Not a moderator

    Messages:
    2,275
    Likes Received:
    13,297
    Location:
    Netherlands
    Well we can't make AfME stop existing, so we might as well try talking to them in case it helps their understanding of the disease and scientific concepts :rolleyes: And if they have a presence here, it's a lot harder for them to claim that they don't know what's going on or what patients are saying.

    They've gotten a lot of things very, very wrong when it comes to ME/CFS research, but they aren't evil and they probably really do want to help. The solution to misguidance is providing proper guidance, not rejecting them and sending them back to Crawley & Co.
     
    MeSci, Simone, 2kidswithME and 30 others like this.
  9. guest001

    guest001 Guest

    This underlines why I simply can't remain here.
     
    Louie41, Inara, Chezboo and 3 others like this.
  10. Valentijn

    Valentijn Not a moderator

    Messages:
    2,275
    Likes Received:
    13,297
    Location:
    Netherlands
    Contrary opinions are intolerable?
     
    Simone, Louie41, Binkie4 and 3 others like this.
  11. Sly Saint

    Sly Saint Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    5,103
    Likes Received:
    42,306
    Location:
    UK
    !!!!!!!
    this appears (as always) to be a very one sided conversation.
     
    Louie41, Inara, Awol and 4 others like this.
  12. large donner

    large donner Guest

    Messages:
    1,214
    Likes Received:
    9,236
    How can an organisation join a forum? Who is the actual single named person who has joined here. I don't think an organisation funded by members should join a public forum and hide behind the organisation name, we should know the single named person we are talking to.
     
    Hipsman, Ruth, Moosie and 24 others like this.
  13. Invisible Woman

    Invisible Woman Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    6,874
    Likes Received:
    40,340
    I frankly don't know what the motivation is behind AfME and their actions past and present.

    I was a member when I was newly ill and gave it up as as a bad job.

    Their membership here is neither here nor there in terms of the discussions we shall have and the arguments we put forward. If they choose to post, fine, in fact good, because then we can have a proper discussion without awkward questions being deleted. This cohld be very informative for the more newly ill and less politically aware.

    They are one member here. Every other person's opinion is just as valid.

    ETA: crossed with @large donner - that is a good point. Charles Shepherd and now Russell Fleming are up front about being members on behalf of MEA and had to handle any resultant flack.
     
    MeSci, Louie41, Docsimsim and 18 others like this.
  14. chrisb

    chrisb Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,839
    Likes Received:
    19,269
    I thought that new members were requested to make an introductory post. Perhaps afme could avail themselves of the opportunity to allay suspicion and minimise dissent amongst established well regarded members.
     
    Louie41, Skycloud, Docsimsim and 11 others like this.
  15. Nancy Blackett

    Nancy Blackett Established Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    56
    Likes Received:
    545
    Well reasoned and reasonable attempts to reason with, and educate afme, carried out by countless well informed patients/advocates, over decades, have made no impact on afme attitudes, policies and practice. Only resulted in more sophisticated rhetoric from afme to circumvent all the concerns and criticisms of the charity's actions and alliances.

    Afme will not become educated about the science here, any more than they have become educated about the science or the harms of BPS politics, by numerous well read, often well qualified, advocates over the many years, decades actually.
     
    Last edited: Mar 13, 2018
    Louie41, Inara, Awol and 10 others like this.
  16. Trish

    Trish Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    25,731
    Likes Received:
    126,238
    Location:
    UK
    I don't have a problem with anyone joining the forum so long as they abide by the rules. I'm sorry others are disturbed by this.

    Since we don't require people to use their real names, we can't know who most people who join are - for all we know the worst proponents of BPS nonsense might be here too. I hope, if they are, they read and learn and mend their ways. We are not an exclusive club for those who agree with us. We are an open science and community forum for anyone interested in ME who is willing to abide by our rules.

    I am trying to understand why some people are unhappy about AfME joining. Is it more disturbing than, say, an individual member of AfME staff or board joining under a pseudonym? I'm not criticising your concern, I'm trying to understand what the problem is.
     
  17. large donner

    large donner Guest

    Messages:
    1,214
    Likes Received:
    9,236
    My issue is with an organisation joining. Imagine if, "the goverment" joined or, Bristol University or the DWP. It's one person one account here and yes we dont have to use our own name but our posts here represent a single person behind such posts. If AfME has actually joined here we have to be sure its them for a fact, whose views they are representing and that its a single person speaking. However, that's not the definition of an organisation.
     
    Ruth, Louie41, Inara and 5 others like this.
  18. Andy

    Andy Committee Member & Outreach

    Messages:
    10,438
    Likes Received:
    75,564
    Location:
    Hampshire, UK
  19. Nancy Blackett

    Nancy Blackett Established Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    56
    Likes Received:
    545
    The UK Biobank did not collude with PACE, facilitate funding Esther Crawley and Peter White's research, support the damaging NICE Guidelines etc etc.
     
    Last edited: Mar 13, 2018
    Louie41, Inara, Awol and 8 others like this.
  20. large donner

    large donner Guest

    Messages:
    1,214
    Likes Received:
    9,236
    Who posts for them and can anyone in that whole organization use that single account and do they even have permission to speak on behalf of all their members without identifying themself?
     
    Louie41 and Inara like this.

Share This Page