PLOS ONE has retracted two papers for image problems, which we’ve learned were brought to the journal’s attention more than four years ago.
The first article came from a group of cancer researchers in China, and it turns out to have a bit more wrong than a few dodgy figures. The second also involved cancer research.
Is a journal likely to be legally liable for any harms that result from actions based on research they have published once its flaws have been pointed out to them?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
