Search results

May be of interest: On Radio 4. https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m0006n0s

What we have learnt from the research and our experience is that by embarking on an individualised programme of graded exercise or activity, people can manage symptoms, improve their health and engage in more activities than they were at the start of treatment. That is very interesting. Even if...

I use this site: https://lunwen.im/ Put only the actual DOI in the search box (ie omit DOI: ).

Great post, thanks, Michiel. A common orthographic error made by many native speakers, including Michael Sharpe, is 'publically' rather than the correct 'publicly'.

Yes, he was an observer for the DWP. He then left the DWP and was asked to stay on (as an observer, I think) in a personal capacity. He did not declare his many conflicts of interest even when he was there in a personal capacity. I seem to recall seeing that while a DWP representative attended...

Hi, @PhysiosforME , and welcome to the forum. Perhaps you'd like to make a brief post in the 'Introduce Yourself' forum and say a little about yourselves. https://www.s4me.info/forums/introduce-yourself.18/

That whole thread between Keith and KD is worth a look.

Keith Laws has been tweeting on this paper.

Programme on how women were disbelieved for years when they said their breast implants were making them ill. https://www.channel4.com/programmes/dispatches/episode-guide/

It is of course a response to the Blease, Geraghty papers on epistemic injustice. Sharpe feels this need to respond to everything, so that if people who take a different view from him post a philosophical paper he has to do one of his own to counter.

They all claim that CBT-GET is effective in eg cancer, MS, but the evidence is just as awful as it is for ME. The whole thing is utter nonsense.

It's awful. It's poor undergraduate philosophy. The whole article reeks of Sharpe trying to be intellectual and failing dismally. I'm amazed it's been accepted for publication.

Thanks. I am slightly hopeful in that I think if they weren't even going to try, they would have said so immediately. But who knows?

Thanks. I'll update when I know anything more.

QMUL is currently considering 'in good faith' my request for data aligned with the original release.

Excellent, thanks for your work on this, Michiel. I should say my help was minimal and the credit is entirely Michiel's.

Preprint made available here. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/early/2019/06/10/666230.full.pdf

Moderator note: Posts discussing the Danish Medical Journal (Ugeskriftet.dk) article have been moved to a new thread here https://www.s4me.info/threads/status-of-cfs-me-2019-brinth-et-al-danish-medical-journal-ugeskriftet-dk.9926/

Thanks again, Adam, for all your work on these very powerful videos.

Moderator note: Posts on Alpha ketoglutarate moved to new thread https://www.s4me.info/threads/alpha-ketoglutarate-for-mitochondrial-respiration-dysfunction.9909/#post-175618