Opinion What are the top replicated ME/CFS findings?

Discussion in 'ME/CFS research' started by Simon M, Apr 26, 2025 at 10:56 AM.

  1. Kitty

    Kitty Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    7,993
    Location:
    UK
    Might it also be useful to mention the issue Jonathan has talked about, where it's possible some negative studies did look at the right thing, just not in the right place?

    If the error is very localised the odds are stacked heavily against finding it, especially when those doing the looking tend to be small teams relying on blood samples for their experiments.
     
  2. Chestnut tree

    Chestnut tree Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    369
    I found this review on NK cell disfunction in ME.

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31727160/

    Is this robust enough to speak of NK cell disfunction in ME?

    Honest question, do not have a science background.

    Edit; and if not, what would it need to become more of a robust finding?
     
    Last edited: Apr 30, 2025 at 2:32 PM
    Kiristar, Steppinup and Yann04 like this.
  3. Jonathan Edwards

    Jonathan Edwards Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    17,070
    Location:
    London, UK
    Not really. Even if their findings are representative they might be showing NK cells showing reduced function in response to something like TGF beta. The NK cells may be fine.

    NK assays are notoriously difficult to interpret. It is hard to see what relevance sleepy NK cells would be to ME/CFS symptoms even if they are sleepy.
     
    bobbler and Chestnut tree like this.
  4. Chestnut tree

    Chestnut tree Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    369
    Thank you Mr Edwards, for the explanation.
     
    voner likes this.

Share This Page