So this is a much bigger deal than the UK Parliamentary debates?
The UK debate ended in a vote but it wasn't a full session. Here it is a whole Congress (if and when the House also passes it anyway) resolution so definitely much more meaningful.So this is a much bigger deal than the UK Parliamentary debates?
Whereas, in recognition of the dearth of research on ME/CFS and the profound impact that the disease has on individuals with ME/CFS and their loved ones and caretakers, the National Institutes of Health (referred to in this preamble as the “NIH”) is “committed to unraveling the underlying biologic cause(s) of ME/CFS as swiftly as possible, and promoting research that will inform the development of effective strategies for treatment and prevention of this devastating condition”;
which doesn't actually rule out CBT and GET as valid treatments, but I imagine it was very hard to come up with workable wording.Whereas the cause of ME/CFS is unknown, there is no diagnostic test for ME/CFS, and there is no treatment for ME/CFS that is approved by the Food and Drug Administration;
AHRQ downgraded all research based on Oxford criteria, which is all of the CBT/GET research, so all psychosocial "treatments" are considered invalid as far as US authorities are concerned, unless psychosocial ideologues actually make an attempt at doing, you know, science, which they will never do as by now they know very well their BS is useless.That's a fantastic result; it must have taken hours and hours of work by many people. It will be useful for advocacy in other countries too - it's the sort of thing that would be good in a package of information given to members of parliament.
Lots of great words including this:
Hopefully that will give those in the NIH who do want to make a difference for people with ME/CFS the ammunition they need.
A small issue is this:
which doesn't actually rule out CBT and GET as valid treatments, but I imagine it was very hard to come up with workable wording.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/senate-resolution/225/actionsDoes anyone know where to find the official notation that this resolution passed?