1. Sign our petition calling on Cochrane to withdraw their review of Exercise Therapy for CFS here.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Guest, the 'News in Brief' for the week beginning 18th March 2024 is here.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Welcome! To read the Core Purpose and Values of our forum, click here.
    Dismiss Notice

UK CMRC 2018 Conference held September 19 & 20 at Bristol

Discussion in 'General ME/CFS news' started by Sasha, Mar 6, 2018.

  1. Sasha

    Sasha Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,768
    Location:
    UK
    :arghh:
     
  2. Jonathan Edwards

    Jonathan Edwards Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    13,273
    Location:
    London, UK

    But people on S4ME are not so dumb, so all is not lost.
     
  3. Sasha

    Sasha Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,768
    Location:
    UK
    But now I feel so bad for the PWRA...

    Surely there must be a billionaire PWRA who'd want to get this done...
     
  4. Dolphin

    Dolphin Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    4,987
    My guess would be that only a small percentage of people with rheumatoid arthritis donate to research. And just like with ME/CFS, a lot of people with significant resources don't donate to research. Perhaps some think they can get better if they just keep trying treatments.

    I know in my country, if we waited until the superrich donated, we would have raised nothing or close to it (I remember that one wealthy person gave £500 when a parent donated their birthday to ME; we wouldn't have got the money otherwise).

    I think if you can get as many people as possible donating rather than just thinking that it is the job of governments to fund all the research, more of the wealthy people will also donate.
    I know I can probably sound like a broken record making such points.
     
  5. Sasha

    Sasha Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,768
    Location:
    UK
    I thought that RA tended to hit people later than ME/CFS, and that more PWRA would have had a chance to earn/inherit their billions by then. And RA must surely be like ME/CFS in that once you've had a few years of trying useless treatments, you'd want to put all your resources into research before you wasted any more of you life being so ill...
     
  6. Dolphin

    Dolphin Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    4,987
    If people with ME/CFS even gave 1% of what they spent on treatments, that would be great. It could be thought of as diversifying your assets, rather than putting all your eggs in one basket. [Unfortunately, that doesn't happen with the majority of people giving nothing].

    Indeed, an ex-member here wrote an aggressive message to me when I suggested the 1% idea (to nobody in particular) a number of months ago (their message also got a number of likes, which was a bit frustrating and disappointing; the aggressive message meant I lost a number of hours sleep that night, but I'm not prepared to be silenced).
     
  7. Sasha

    Sasha Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,768
    Location:
    UK
    I agree - as many of us should be giving who can, IMO. Sorry you had aggro over this.

    I still do wonder why the very rich don't spend more on this, though, in any disease.
     
    Skycloud and Dolphin like this.
  8. Dolphin

    Dolphin Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    4,987
    I heard that the Barclay brothers paid for a lot of the research by the Behans and related teams 20-30 years ago.

    Lord Sainsbury funded The Linbury Trust. Unfortunately a lot of the ME/CFS research they funded was biopsychosocial.

    A number of wealthy individuals have funded research in the US. For example the Chronic Fatigue Initiative got $10,000,000/similar. I heard that Jose Montoya's got a multi-million dollar donation. The Whittemores gave a lot to various research charities.

    Derek Enlander got $1,000,000 from an individual from what I heard but unfortunately I don't think it ever led to any published studies.

    I recall the CFIDS Association of America thanked their donors over the years in the mid-2000s, and there were a lot of people who had given 5-figure sums and some had given six-figure sums

    Edited to add: The Mason Foundation in Australia is from one family.
     
    Last edited: Oct 8, 2018
    Indigophoton, ukxmrv and Sasha like this.
  9. Skycloud

    Skycloud Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,187
    Location:
    UK
    Last edited: Oct 8, 2018
    Indigophoton, Hutan, Andy and 3 others like this.
  10. phil_scottish_borders

    phil_scottish_borders Established Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    57
    Location:
    Borders, Scotland
    I've PMed you.

    I can't stress enough, no one on the MEGA PAG has ever encompassed "the bps lot" in any way.

    We had some resignations last year that were due to reasons personal to each member. Some of the reasons some people left (in 2017) are no longer there (I'll just leave that there....). We have also had resignations, sadly, due to deteriorating health, and life changing events (starting a family). As you know, MEGA is no more.

    The recent CMRC conference was a success and the MEA have now written it up, which you can find here: https://www.meassociation.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/MEA-Report-CMRC-Research-Conference-2018.pdf
     
    Hutan, Andy and adambeyoncelowe like this.
  11. Andy

    Andy Committee Member

    Messages:
    21,810
    Location:
    Hampshire, UK
    Hutan, adambeyoncelowe and Trish like this.
  12. Jonathan Edwards

    Jonathan Edwards Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    13,273
    Location:
    London, UK
    I thought this year that maybe I should let CMRC heal its wounds and spare them my annoying questions. But next year ...

    The level needs to go up two gears on the left handlebar and then another two on the right. People who speak drivel should leave the podium shaking in their boots. That was always the way at Barts or UCH Grand Rounds. If you were speaking and George Simon pointedly turned his hearing aid off you knew you were done for. Those were the days when things got done ....

    Sorry, getting a bit nostalgic there.
     
    Indigophoton, Nellie, obeat and 11 others like this.
  13. Andy

    Andy Committee Member

    Messages:
    21,810
    Location:
    Hampshire, UK
  14. NelliePledge

    NelliePledge Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    13,142
    Location:
    UK West Midlands
    All those involved need to take a look at the Video of the OMF livestream to see what the community is looking for from this type of event. If they want to have one event for researchers only to share unpublished findings that’s fine but there needs to be active engagement with the community and answering questions. And the presentations have to be shown to be relevant. Not good enough to have a superficially relevant sounding title fatiguish/painish/(god help us)medically unexplainedish. the people presenting have to have at least made an effort to educate themselves to a basic level about ME, be aware of the international context and be able to explain where their research findings could be relevant to research into the cause of ME.
     
    Sarah94, Inara, Indigophoton and 9 others like this.
  15. Jonathan Edwards

    Jonathan Edwards Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    13,273
    Location:
    London, UK
    I have not watched but I suspect it is more on target.

    But I would not rule out my asking some pretty annoying questions there too. Like why don't your graphs have proper legends for the axes and variance indicators! Where was that methods slide...
     
    Indigophoton, Skycloud, MeSci and 9 others like this.
  16. Andy

    Andy Committee Member

    Messages:
    21,810
    Location:
    Hampshire, UK
    When will your paper be published would be one question I'd be asking of many at the OMF, but that is just my frustration with them
     
    Trish, Cheshire, Sasha and 1 other person like this.
  17. Sasha

    Sasha Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,768
    Location:
    UK
    IIRC, OMF had the facility for people to submit questions online during the livestream, which was a great idea (although it stuffed up a bit on the day, I think). They did indeed set a great example for patient engagement.

    The CMRC should be aware that many of us who would like to attend the conference aren't doing so because we're too disabled. They should be doing everything they can to give us online access and to allow us to take part - including asking questions. If people are still coming out with BPS horseshit - or horseshit of any kind - it's unacceptable that we as patients don't get a chance to challenge them. It's our lives they're affecting.
     
  18. alex3619

    alex3619 Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,129
    It would be nice if null results were at least announced somewhere.
     
    MeSci, Trish, Snowdrop and 1 other person like this.
  19. dave30th

    dave30th Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,182
    yes you should. I am a reasonably good judge of bad biopsychosocial research and can construct cogent arguments about that but not particularly good on assessing the benefits and drawbacks of this or that medical approach.
     
    Indigophoton, Skycloud, MeSci and 8 others like this.
  20. large donner

    large donner Guest

    Messages:
    1,214
    I actually thought I was dumb compared to scientists until I started comparing myself to scientists.

    Then I realised had I religious beliefs when it came to accepting 'science' from scientists blindly.

    Even if their conclusions were right I had no idea why I believed them so my belief in mainstream scientists were essentially faith based.

    Now I don't believe ANYTHING unless I have the time to look into it myself which I don't. Therefore I either have no opinion on most things unless I am interested in the given topic and can examine all sides of the story.

    From there I realised most data is either hidden, fudged, misinterpretable , or embellished so now I am back at square one, ignorant as fuck on almost everything except how bad the BPS theory on ME is.

    Now nothing else would surprise me on any subject.

    I do know however that its the establishment that is desperate to point at others as the perpetrators of 'fake news' and 'conspiracy theories' when the mainstream news is nothing but a bunch of talking head teleprinter readers sponsored by the advertisers and vested interests who prop up their TV channels, newspapers and even medical journals.
     
    Last edited: Oct 9, 2018
    fossil, Inara, Indigophoton and 6 others like this.

Share This Page