U.K. National Institute of Health Research review - Living with COVID-19, Part 1 Oct. 2020, Part 2 March 2021

Mike Dean

Senior Member (Voting Rights)
This post and others on this thread were moved from possibility of ME or PVFS after Covid-19, long Covid
https://www.s4me.info/threads/possi...ovid-19-long-covid.14074/page-114#post-295527


NIHR review:

Living with Covid19
Published on 15 October 2020
doi: 10.3310/themedreview_41169
A dynamic review of the evidence around ongoing Covid19 symptoms (often called Long Covid).
https://evidence.nihr.ac.uk/themedreview/living-with-covid19/

Brief news item here
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-54540544
 
Last edited by a moderator:
NIHR review:
Living with Covid19
Published on 15 October 2020
doi: 10.3310/themedreview_41169
A dynamic review of the evidence around ongoing Covid19 symptoms (often called Long Covid).
https://evidence.nihr.ac.uk/themedreview/living-with-covid19/

Just skimmed the references...

Murray, A., Gerada, C., Greenhalgh, T. (2020) We need a Nightingale model for rehab after covid-19 HSJ April 8 www.hsj.co.uk/commissioning/we-need-a-nightingale-model-for-rehab-after-covid-19-/7027335.article

edited to add: Seems to be a typo?
TG not mentioned as an author in the linked article.
 
Last edited:
NIHR review:
Living with Covid19
Published on 15 October 2020
doi: 10.3310/themedreview_41169
A dynamic review of the evidence around ongoing Covid19 symptoms (often called Long Covid).
https://evidence.nihr.ac.uk/themedreview/living-with-covid19/

Brief news item here
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-54540544
These are mentioned under Resources:

Fatigue

Physios for ME (Myalgic Encephalomyelitis) have produced guidance on the potential complication for Post-Viral Fatigue Syndrome (PVFS). www.physiosforme.com/covid-19

The (Myalgic Encephalomyelitis) ME association has produced a leaflet on post-viral fatigue (PVF) and Post-Viral Fatigue syndrome (PVFS) following coronavirus infection. https://meassociation.org.uk/wp-con...-Following-Coronavirus-Infection-30.04.20.pdf
 
NIHR review:
Living with Covid19
Published on 15 October 2020
doi: 10.3310/themedreview_41169
A dynamic review of the evidence around ongoing Covid19 symptoms (often called Long Covid).
https://evidence.nihr.ac.uk/themedreview/living-with-covid19/

Brief news item here
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-54540544
The BMJ - Long covid could be four different syndromes, review suggests

A team of researchers and doctors reviewed current evidence and interviewed post-hospitalised and non-hospitalised patients and reported that long covid did not seem to fit as one syndrome. They suggested that people experiencing long term effects of covid-19 may have different syndromes such as post-intensive care syndrome, post-viral fatigue syndrome, and long term covid syndrome.
 
A team of researchers and doctors reviewed current evidence and interviewed post-hospitalised and non-hospitalised patients and reported that long covid did not seem to fit as one syndrome. They suggested that people experiencing long term effects of covid-19 may have different syndromes such as post-intensive care syndrome, post-viral fatigue syndrome, and long term covid syndrome.

I find this strange - perhaps it's the wording or just my brain.

It seems to assume that all syndromes are known or that everything, even if it's something never seen before, should be shoehorned into the boxes where everything else fits.

By all means compare & bear in mind lessons learned from past disorders & syndromes. However by separating out into arbitrary syndrome definition (arbitrary in this case at least) you may miss vital information.

Important clues could exist if one were to consider what could cause both this symptom and that. Rather than assume that, because those symptom clusters can appear independently in some people, those symptoms are not closely connected in this case.
 
Just skimmed the references...

Murray, A., Gerada, C., Greenhalgh, T. (2020) We need a Nightingale model for rehab after covid-19 HSJ April 8 www.hsj.co.uk/commissioning/we-need-a-nightingale-model-for-rehab-after-covid-19-/7027335.article

edited to add: Seems to be a typo?
TG not mentioned as an author in the linked article.

That's odd.

Also, there was a Science Media Centre briefing on the NIHR report: https://www.sciencemediacentre.org/nihr-launches-dynamic-themed-review-on-long-covid/

These are mentioned under Resources:

Fatigue

Physios for ME (Myalgic Encephalomyelitis) have produced guidance on the potential complication for Post-Viral Fatigue Syndrome (PVFS). www.physiosforme.com/covid-19

The (Myalgic Encephalomyelitis) ME association has produced a leaflet on post-viral fatigue (PVF) and Post-Viral Fatigue syndrome (PVFS) following coronavirus infection. https://meassociation.org.uk/wp-con...-Following-Coronavirus-Infection-30.04.20.pdf

That's interesting too.
 
I'd just assumed that they spoke to more people than that. The had 14 members of the steering group.

BBC report says:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-54540544

Based on interviews with 14 members of a long-Covid support group on Facebook and the most recent published research, the review found recurring symptoms affecting everything from breathing, the brain, the heart and cardiovascular system to the kidneys, the gut, the liver and the skin...


NIHR Review says:

https://evidence.nihr.ac.uk/themedreview/living-with-covid19/

(...)

This review differs from our previous reviews. Given the importance of the subject matter and the need for information to ensure people receive care now, we have taken the unusual decision to write this review despite the relatively small amount of published evidence. We worked with a steering group and a patient reference group who provided us with a broad range of expertise and perspectives. Their insight helped deepen our understanding of the new phenomenon ‘ongoing Covid19’ in people who do not recover after a short period of illness.


14 in the Steering Group (all named)

13 in the Reference Group (all named bar one)


NIHR Review also says:

In the absence of detailed research into the lived experience, we held a focus group with some members of the Long Covid Facebook group (which currently has over 20,000 members) and agreed a summary report with them.
 
Moved post

There is a LOT to unpack here and this document probably deserves its own thread but there are interesting word choices used here:



Alternative reading of those pages:
Ewj0HkBWgAIkD58


Ewj0HkxWgAE4VLL

The document: https://evidence.nihr.ac.uk/themedreview/living-with-covid19-second-review/

A bit of a swing and a miss that in brain fog they miss out on ME despite having shown surprising cogent understanding elsewhere. I wonder what that says about the NICE guidance that they are referred to here as mostly a done deal. Maybe nothing, but given how hotly political this topic is, I doubt.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Skimming the rest and it's better than what came before, still lots of work ahead. Neurological symptoms are still badly misunderstood and seem poised to get lost in the FND black hole unless rational people get involved to stop this.

Frankly most of this stuff should have been obvious a year ago, this is mostly playing catching up, still far behind the curve. Too much attempts to describe things without listening to patients. As usual. But it is better. Which is rare.
 
Moved posts

Has this been posted?


https://evidence.nihr.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/NIHR_COVID_REPORT_FINAL-150321-1_1_.pdf
NIHR press release:
https://www.nihr.ac.uk/news/nihr-publishes-second-themed-review-on-long-covid/27232

Looks dispiritingly familiar-mentions exertion intolerance but assumes that lots of nice rehab and exercise/psychology is still the best thing- just don't call it GET. It is pretty much the worst compromise interpretation of new ME NICE guidelines. It even thinks IAPT results are good.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
From p4 of above
"We conclude that the journey of Long Covid is not well understood and it is important to continue to listen to the lived experience as we move into the second year of this new disease"
 
Has this been posted?


https://evidence.nihr.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/NIHR_COVID_REPORT_FINAL-150321-1_1_.pdf
NIHR press release:
https://www.nihr.ac.uk/news/nihr-publishes-second-themed-review-on-long-covid/27232

Looks dispiritingly familiar-mentions exertion intolerance but assumes that lots of nice rehab and exercise/psychology is still the best thing- just don't call it GET. It is pretty much the worst compromise interpretation of new ME NICE guidelines. It even thinks IAPT results are good.

On the plus side (joke):
"Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) programme. Clark (2018) reported that 50% of people receiving IAPT recover and two-thirds show significant improvement."
OK that (presumably - can't access the cited study*) is what the patients reported in the questionnaires**.


*Clark, D.M., (2018) Realising the mass public benefit of evidence-based psychological therapies: the IAPT program. Annual review of clinical psychology, 14, pp.159-183. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurevclinpsy-050817-084833

**
https://mindhacks.com/2009/02/27/sir-humphrey-teaches-questionnaire-design/
 
The section on exercise on page 21 is not as bad as I feared:
A key element of rehabilitation is exercise. Exercise produces supercompensation to make the body stronger, but individuals have different levels of exercise tolerance. Rehabilitation exercise therefore needs careful prescription and monitoring.

The use of exercise as a therapy in Long Covid is contested. On one hand, many have noted the similarities between some of the symptoms of Long Covid and Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/ Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/ CFS) which can include exercise intolerance. Studies of SARS survivors raised concerns that exercise intolerance may persist for months after infection and Raman et al (2020) found exercise intolerance correlated with markers of systemic inflammation. Many of the patients in Raman’s study stopped Cardio Pulmonary Exercise Testing (CPET) early because of generalised muscle ache and fatigue rather than breathlessness.

In July 2020 NICE made a statement on its website that it should not be assumed that the recommendations on graded exercise therapy in its 2007 guideline on ME/CFS (CG53) apply to people with fatigue following Covid19. NICE issued a new draft guideline on ME/CFS for consultation in November 2020, recommending that exercise should be personalised and overseen by a physiotherapist or occupational therapist with specialist training and expertise. It recommends that fixed incremental increases in physical exercise, for example graded exercise therapy, should not be used.

On the other hand, physical activity is a well-established rehabilitation intervention for people who have become deconditioned, including those who have been bed ridden for some time. Whilst exercise should be approached with caution in ME/CFS, it may be helpful in other viral conditions, for example a systematic review of exercise and cognitive function in people living with HIV (Quigley et al 2019) suggested that physical activity may preserve or improve cognition, although none of the studies were interventional and further research is needed.

Exercise tolerance/intolerance should not be seen as binary concept. A better term might be “symptom-titrated physical activity”. Using the term physical activity instead of exercise therapy also highlights the need to think about exercise as part of a person’s day to day life and the need to pace all activity. Pacing has parallels with elite athletes who cannot train to their maximum every day of the week and need to plan when to fit in the most demanding session and the lighter activity to complement it.
 
The section on exercise on page 21 is not as bad as I feared:

I am not so sure. This looks to me like a perfect recipe for doublespeak.
Exercise tolerance/intolerance should not be seen as binary concept. A better term might be “symptom-titrated physical activity”. Using the term physical activity instead of exercise therapy also highlights the need to think about exercise as part of a person’s day to day life and the need to pace all activity. Pacing has parallels with elite athletes who cannot train to their maximum every day of the week and need to plan when to fit in the most demanding session and the lighter activity to complement it.

So managing LongCovid is a bit liker elite athletes on their not so tough days?
The obsession with activity as a means to getting better continues unabated with a mental contortion that seems to deal with the problem of 'exertion intolerance' - by saying you don't have to call it that.

It could have been worse maybe if it just said everyone should exercise but I think it is in a sense even worse because it says yes we know all about PWME having trouble but change the words and hey presto everyoneshouldexercise. It's all OK therapists, we can carry on exactly as before - whoopee!

 
Back
Top Bottom