1. Guest, the 'News in Brief' post for w/c 11th Feb is here.
    Dismiss Notice

Trial By Error: A Letter to BMJ Open

Discussion in 'General ME/CFS News' started by Eagles, Feb 19, 2018.

  1. Eagles

    Eagles Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    103
    Likes Received:
    1,547
    TiredSam, sea, Awol and 41 others like this.
  2. NelliePledge

    NelliePledge Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,231
    Likes Received:
    16,053
    Location:
    UK East Midlands
    Good to see our top scientists weighing in again against more dodgy research
     
  3. Sbag

    Sbag Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    246
    Likes Received:
    1,812
    good start to the week :)
     
  4. Luther Blissett

    Luther Blissett Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,672
    Likes Received:
    12,772
    Professor Racaniello does write a good letter.

    As usual, many thanks to everyone involved, however big or small, seen or unseen who worked together to produce the information involved.
     
    Lidia, Louie41, TiredSam and 18 others like this.
  5. Barry

    Barry Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,624
    Likes Received:
    24,235
    One of the letter's great strengths - amongst many - is that it tightly focuses on just one issue, but an issue that is absolutely damning and totally inescapable.
     
    Louie41, TiredSam, MEMarge and 18 others like this.
  6. Esther12

    Esther12 Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,612
    Likes Received:
    21,916
    Another strong letter. Thanks to everyone involved. Thought I'd add a couple of extra links on the school attendance study for people who might be new to this -

    Here's the misleading COPE submission on this: https://publicationethics.org/case/service-evaluation-research-controversial-area-medicine

    And Tuller's blog about it: http://www.virology.ws/2018/01/02/trial-by-error-the-school-absence-study-revisited/

    re SMILE, it really is clear cut that SMILE does not meet this requirement:

    "In accordance with the ICMJE Recommendations, BMJ will not consider reports of clinical trials unless they were registered prospectively before recruitment of any participants. This applies to trials which commenced after 1 July 2005; for older trials retrospective registration will be acceptable, but only if completed before submission of the manuscript to the journal."

    I wonder if Crawley lied about this as part of the BMJ submission process? Their trial registration already falsely claims that it was prospectively registered: http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN81456207
     
    Nellie, Louie41, sea and 19 others like this.
  7. Esther12

    Esther12 Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,612
    Likes Received:
    21,916
    Looks like the latest COPE meeting led to no further information, and this new conclusion:

    https://publicationethics.org/case/service-evaluation-research-controversial-area-medicine

    Wow. What impressive follow-up. COPE are awesome at dealing with ethical problems.

    Previously:

    https://web.archive.org/web/2018030...ne+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=uk&client=firefox-b
     
  8. dave30th

    dave30th Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    465
    Likes Received:
    7,912
    Interesting. I do not think this BMJ Open decision will be the last we hear about this issue.
     
  9. Sean

    Sean Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,283
    Likes Received:
    10,590
    Lofty noble intentions and rules are utterly meaningless if they are not enforced.

    Few things will create general cynicism and despair and disengagement more effectively than that situation.
     
  10. Barry

    Barry Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,624
    Likes Received:
    24,235
    Ostriches, heads and sand come to mind. They just don't realise it's their backsides about to get bitten.
     
  11. Valentijn

    Valentijn Not a moderator

    Messages:
    2,275
    Likes Received:
    13,212
    Location:
    Netherlands
    COPE never had noble intentions - their structure and rules have been formulated to act as a rubber stamp for the members (journals) and silence the public criticism of those journals when they commit ethical violations.
     

Share This Page