My wife and I have been testing out nicotine patches, as part of the loose LC patient self-experiment. The harms seemed minimal enough -- and indeed have been, with, for me, worsened sleep, general slight worsening of symptoms globally akin to consuming caffeine daily, and development of an unusual, off-putting body odor -- so I decided to give it a go. As part of that, I filled out the survey that organizers of the Nicotine Test created (which includes, at least some of the organizers of Remission Biome). I found the survey to be confusing in parts, conflicting in others, and with questions that are weighted in problematic ways. I was also alarmed that the survey asks respondents whether they had "remission events" -- terms developed by the Remission Biome group -- but does not define those terms with any degree of clarity.
If this survey is a window into how the Remission Biome group will study patient responses in the 50 person antibiotic and probiotic regimen they're trying to organize, it's a worrying one. Particularly as the group continues to make strong pronouncements about the benefits of their regimen. One recent tweet claimed "Cessation of sickness behavior does not mean 'no damage'. The #Renegade50 WILL experience reductions or complete cessation of sickness behavior. If they act like they are suddenly not sick they will crash and potentially undo progress." Others are similarly biasing.