Wonko
Senior Member (Voting Rights)
They are expected to be directly related in that if the blood level is too high this is removed by the kidneys and excreted so as to show in urine testing.
It should not be possible to have a high urine test whilst having a normal blood glucose level, at least as I understand it.
ATM my thinking is that something I am taking, and there is more than one candidate that might have an effect, is preventing my body from storing glucose as fat, at the same time as it's either still releasing it from the liver, or it's converting protein to glucose which it then can't use, so it's being dumped.
Both would assume that it's being dumped before it enters the finger I test blood from, e.g in the first case that the blood from my liver, after the release of stored glucose, is going through my kidneys and having the glucose extracted before it goes anywhere else.
But I suspect that's all biologically illiterate, all I know is that a test strip shows my level is very high, within a few minutes of a blood test showing it's perfectly normal.
Something's going on, as in order to be in ketosis, at all, it's my understanding that the bodies glycogen stores need to be more or less exhausted, something that's backed up by the normal BG reading, and I'm not eating a significant amount of carbs, but they have to be coming from somewhere.
I would, visually, appear to be dropping significant amounts of fat, but my understanding is that wouldn't explain it, as fat isn't turned into glucose as I understand it. It's turned into ketones, which are then used instead of glucose.
The test strips are only 2 weeks old, and did say my glucose levels were normal (i.e. not raised) on the test I did when I got them, when my BG level was 6.2 (I think - it certainly wasn't raised, for a diabetic, but wasn't as low as it's been the last week). So I have no reason to assume that they are faulty, yet.
It should not be possible to have a high urine test whilst having a normal blood glucose level, at least as I understand it.
ATM my thinking is that something I am taking, and there is more than one candidate that might have an effect, is preventing my body from storing glucose as fat, at the same time as it's either still releasing it from the liver, or it's converting protein to glucose which it then can't use, so it's being dumped.
Both would assume that it's being dumped before it enters the finger I test blood from, e.g in the first case that the blood from my liver, after the release of stored glucose, is going through my kidneys and having the glucose extracted before it goes anywhere else.
But I suspect that's all biologically illiterate, all I know is that a test strip shows my level is very high, within a few minutes of a blood test showing it's perfectly normal.
Something's going on, as in order to be in ketosis, at all, it's my understanding that the bodies glycogen stores need to be more or less exhausted, something that's backed up by the normal BG reading, and I'm not eating a significant amount of carbs, but they have to be coming from somewhere.
I would, visually, appear to be dropping significant amounts of fat, but my understanding is that wouldn't explain it, as fat isn't turned into glucose as I understand it. It's turned into ketones, which are then used instead of glucose.
The test strips are only 2 weeks old, and did say my glucose levels were normal (i.e. not raised) on the test I did when I got them, when my BG level was 6.2 (I think - it certainly wasn't raised, for a diabetic, but wasn't as low as it's been the last week). So I have no reason to assume that they are faulty, yet.
Last edited: