1. Guest, the 'News in Brief' for the week beginning 29th May 2023 is here.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Welcome! To read the Core Purpose and Values of our forum, click here.
    Dismiss Notice

Size matters: just how big is BIG? Quantifying realistic sample size requirements for human genome epidemiology

Discussion in 'Research methodology news and research' started by WillowJ, May 19, 2019.

  1. WillowJ

    WillowJ Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Background Despite earlier doubts, a string of recent successes indicates that if sample sizes are large enough, it is possible—both in theory and in practice—to identify and replicate genetic associations with common complex diseases.

    But human genome epidemiology is expensive and, from a strategic perspective, it is still unclear what ‘large enough’ really means. This question has critical implications for governments, funding agencies, bioscientists and the tax-paying public. Difficult strategic decisions with imposing price tags and important opportunity costs must be taken.

    Methods Conventional power calculations for case–control studies disregard many basic elements of analytic complexity—e.g. errors in clinical assessment, and the impact of unmeasured aetiological determinants—and can seriously underestimate true sample size requirements.

    This article describes, and applies, a rigorous simulation-based approach to power calculation that deals more comprehensively with analytic complexity and has been implemented on the web as ESPRESSO: (www.p3gobservatory.org/powercalculator.htm).

    Results Using this approach, the article explores the realistic power profile of stand-alone and nested case–control studies in a variety of settings and provides a robust quantitative foundation for determining the required sample size both of individual biobanks and of large disease-based consortia.

    Despite universal acknowledgment of the importance of large sample sizes, our results suggest that contemporary initiatives are still, at best, at the lower end of the range of desirable sample size. Insufficient power remains particularly problematic for studies exploring gene–gene or gene–environment interactions.

    Discussion Sample size calculation must be both accurate and realistic, and we must continue to strengthen national and international cooperation in the design, conduct, harmonization and integration of studies in human genome epidemiology.

    Keywords: Human genome epidemiology, biobank, sample size, statistical power, simulation studies, measurement error, reliability, aetiological heterogeneity
    andypants, obeat, Hutan and 2 others like this.
  2. WillowJ

    WillowJ Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Paul R Burton, Anna L Hansell, Isabel Fortier, Teri A Manolio, Muin J Khoury, Julian Little, and Paul Elliott. Quantifying realistic sample size requirements for human genome epidemiology
    Size matters: just how big is BIG? Int J Epidemiol. 2009 Feb; 38(1): 263–273. Published online 2008 Aug 1. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyn147

    Free full text: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2639365/
    obeat likes this.
  3. Snow Leopard

    Snow Leopard Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    The "Time to achieve required numbers of cases" in longitudinal population based cohorts is interesting (Figure 3). The consequence that it takes decades, given an initial sample size of 500,000 to accumulate enough cases for common diseases.
    andypants, obeat and WillowJ like this.

Share This Page