AR561
Established Member
I understand the AI rule better now, so I won’t post or privately send AI generated attachments or AI analysis of members’ posts through S4ME.
My concerns about FND terminology and diagnostic overconfidence predate my AI use. I’m happy to discuss the issue in my own words and receive correction, source checking, and critique. I had the idea with input we could make a response that includes patient stories (not names) or logical criticisms. People have different knowledge and experiences so that can be helpful for moving forward in understanding. Given the strictness of the AI rules I’m open to any recommendation for discussion group or something where you can send AI attachments during discussion. You can also comment here too, of course. If you can think of any references worth mentioning or have examples of the worst and best ones you’ve seen (for a steel-man argument) please share the name.
My concerns about FND terminology and diagnostic overconfidence predate my AI use. I’m happy to discuss the issue in my own words and receive correction, source checking, and critique. I had the idea with input we could make a response that includes patient stories (not names) or logical criticisms. People have different knowledge and experiences so that can be helpful for moving forward in understanding. Given the strictness of the AI rules I’m open to any recommendation for discussion group or something where you can send AI attachments during discussion. You can also comment here too, of course. If you can think of any references worth mentioning or have examples of the worst and best ones you’ve seen (for a steel-man argument) please share the name.
Last edited: