Post-COVID-19 syndrome in children and young people: awareness among paediatric trainees in South Wales, 2025, Ahmed et al

hotblack

Senior Member (Voting Rights)
Post-COVID-19 syndrome in children and young people: awareness among paediatric trainees in South Wales

Ahmed N, Vallabhaneni P

Abstract
Introduction
Post-COVID-19 condition (PCS), commonly known as Long COVID, has been increasingly reported among children, particularly those of school age. Although many children eventually recover, the syndrome can have serious implications for their education, social development, and mental health. Early research suggested that SARS-CoV-2 infections in children were generally milder compared to adults; however, more recent evidence has shown that PCS can manifest in children even after mild COVID-19 cases. Despite this, research into PCS in children has lagged behind studies focused on adult populations, creating a gap in the understanding and management of this condition in paediatric care.

Objective
This study aimed to assess the knowledge and awareness of PCS among paediatric trainees in South Wales, specifically their understanding of the condition’s definition, aetiology, risk factors, clinical presentation, and management strategies.

Methods
A structured questionnaire comprising 10 questions was developed and administered to 27 paediatric trainees in South Wales, from ST1-ST3 (n=11) to ST4-ST8 (n=16). The survey aimed to evaluate their knowledge of PCS in paediatric populations, including clinical features, risk factors, and available management strategies.

Results
The findings revealed that none of the trainees were aware of any local rehabilitation or support services available for children with Long COVID. In terms of specific knowledge, 74% of trainees correctly identified that PCS is less common in children than in adults. A majority (96%) correctly noted that the impact of prior COVID-19 infection and/or vaccination on the development of PCS in children remains unclear. However, only 7% were aware of the wide range of PCS prevalence reported in children, varying from 0.52% to 66%, according to various studies.

Regarding aetiology, 33% of trainees correctly answered that Vitamin D deficiency is not considered a causative factor in PCS. Only 4% of trainees correctly identified the median age of children with PCS (13 years), compared to those with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) (15 years). Furthermore, just 7% of trainees were aware of anecdotal reports indicating that many children may experience some symptom improvement within two months, although severely affected children may remain unwell. In terms of assessing psychosocial history, 41% correctly identified the ISARIC questionnaire as the recommended tool. Additionally, 96% recognized that optimizing sleep, activity, diet, and emotional well-being should be prioritized when managing PCS in children. A significant portion (85%) correctly emphasized the importance of balancing activity and rest, advising children to maintain consistent activity levels, even on both good and bad days.

Moreover, 81% of trainees correctly identified increasing dietary salt as an important management strategy for children experiencing autonomic dysfunction associated with PCS. The results indicate varied levels of knowledge among trainees, with notable gaps in understanding the epidemiology and management of PCS.

Conclusion
The study suggests that paediatric trainees in South Wales exhibit limited awareness of rehabilitation and support services for children with Long COVID. While trainees demonstrated an adequate understanding of basic PCS facts, including symptomatology and prevalence, there were significant deficiencies in their knowledge regarding PCS epidemiology, risk factors, and comprehensive management strategies. These findings highlight the need for enhanced educational initiatives and resources to better equip paediatric healthcare professionals in addressing the challenges posed by Long COVID in children.

Link (Archives of Disease in Childhood)
https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2025-rcpch.475
 
A significant portion (85%) correctly emphasized the importance of balancing activity and rest, advising children to maintain consistent activity levels, even on both good and bad days.

= no authorisation for school absence, and if your parents keep you off school when you're exhausted they get reported to social services.
 
These people (or maybe the NHS) seem to have invented a 'Post-Covid Syndrome' although they call it post Covid condition. Even those who talk of Long Covid are aware that it covers a variety of different problems. When did it become a 'syndrome' with a particular treatment? When did any of these 'facts' actually become validated information?

This is what happens when physicians start specialising in medical education and that 'foolish consistency' of Emerson's takes over the brain.
 
Seems there's still no escape from the deliberate disinformation merchants.
Yes, it did seem like one set of people with some things they have decided are facts making a report claiming that another set of people weren't aware of these facts being facts and that that is a problem. No wonder trainees and patients are confused.

There's so much uncertainty around Long Covid/PASC/PCS/etc but one thing that does seem certain is repeating mistakes from the past in how to approach that uncertainty.
 
Seems there's still no escape from the deliberate disinformation merchants.
Wishcare is very fashionable these days. I wish facts were fashionable, but clearly everyone seems to just pick and choose whatever facts they want to be true, and that medicine has not escaped rapid enshittification. Even as it started from a flimsy state to begin with. Most of the nonsense here has its origins from a time before electricity.

Most of this is plain embarrassing. It reflects far less real world knowledge than what most of those suffering from it can manage after a few weeks of browsing through forums. But they have no way to know this, so they just... do nothing useful and call it good enough.

There still goes the usual cycle where people make up some stuff, form it into some sort of "common wisdom", which decades later is revealed to be mostly a bunch of nonsense, as they themselves repeat the same cycle all over again.

It's hard to blame the average physician, given that using only official sources they simply have no chance of being well-informed. But those official sources are all written by average physicians, so this is just basically a set of interlocking gears where no one is to blame because never moving is seen as a smart thing to do.
 
where no one is to blame because never moving is seen as a smart thing to do.
Often I think the problem can be the reverse. A lot of this comes from a desire, or even a demand (institutional or patient) to be seen to know and seen to be doing something. When tbh a lot would be better served by the opposite. Not knowing and doing nothing are underrated.
 
Back
Top