1. Click here, Guest, and read the 'News in Brief' post for w/c 15th July.
    Dismiss Notice

Ofcom rule that Sky News' presentation of the Perrin Technique was "not duly accurate or duly impartial"

Discussion in 'General ME/CFS News' started by Andy, Aug 30, 2018.

  1. Andy

    Andy Committee Member & Outreach

    Messages:
    6,738
    Likes Received:
    50,077
    Location:
    Hampshire, UK
    It could be argued that Ofcom here demonstrate a better ability to analyse the results of a research paper than the MRC....
    https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/ass...ue-360-ofcom-broadcast-on-demand-bulletin.pdf, skip to p. 20 for the start of this specific ruling.
     
  2. Sly Saint

    Sly Saint Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,114
    Likes Received:
    26,233
    Location:
    UK
    Last edited: Aug 30, 2018
  3. Esther12

    Esther12 Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,074
    Likes Received:
    25,424
    It probably is difficult for them to provide a high quality response about every piece of research the MEA are asked to comment on. The way Sky interpreted the MEA comment could show the advantage of including a general comment like "we have serious concerns that some patients are being encouraged to spend their time and money on interventions that lack any good evidence of efficacy".

    edit: @Andy posts more from the MEA in the next post, and it looks like they did say something very similar! Bad Sky.
     
    Last edited: Aug 30, 2018
  4. Andy

    Andy Committee Member & Outreach

    Messages:
    6,738
    Likes Received:
    50,077
    Location:
    Hampshire, UK
    If you read further on in the judgement, Ofcom say
    So Ofcom are of the opinion that Sky essentially weren't interested in representing the MEAs counter-opinion.
     
  5. InitialConditions

    InitialConditions Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    131
    Likes Received:
    743
    Location:
    North-west England
    I really wish Raymond Perrin would stop with the bombastic claims, because I actually think his theory holds some weight. I am convinved the lymphatic system plays a big role in this illness. I'm glad he worked together with researchers and NHS clinicians to write the paper in BMJ, and I do think there may be scope for accurate assessment of ME using physical characteristics. But this is still a theory. There really is very little evidence backing up his claims. For example, his theory is build on the idea of varicose lymphatics, which I find interesting because I can feel exactly what he describes in my own neck and chest area. But you search for 'varicose lymphatics' on google and you get next to zero relevent results (except those from content written about the Perrin Technique). He's really talking a different language to most clinicians.
     
  6. Jonathan Edwards

    Jonathan Edwards Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    4,716
    Likes Received:
    49,393
    I think he is talking the same language but he is using the words in a way that makes no anatomical sense. He talks of a tender point over the left breast related to the thoracic duct. But the thoracic duct is way deep inside the ribcage. I don't see how you are going to get varicose lymphatics in the head and neck because they are above the heart and so under no hydrostatic pressure. His account is sort of free-wheeling looniness without a scrap of evidence (as you say).
     
  7. adambeyoncelowe

    adambeyoncelowe Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,555
    Likes Received:
    10,525
    :rofl:
     
  8. arewenearlythereyet

    arewenearlythereyet Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,888
    Likes Received:
    13,533
    Now that is a great tagline...I’ll have to bank that one for future use :D
     
  9. Adrian

    Adrian Administrator

    Messages:
    3,890
    Likes Received:
    18,614
    Location:
    UK
    Is that the medical equivalent of the Morecambe and Wise's sketch to i'm playing all the right notes just not in the right order?
     
  10. Adrian

    Adrian Administrator

    Messages:
    3,890
    Likes Received:
    18,614
    Location:
    UK
    I think this is interesting. In the past I have complained to the BBC about their coverage of PACE/Crawleys work and their failure to put other view points. Being the BBC they dismiss such complaints claiming they have over coverage that balances (which they don't). So this ruling from ofcom is interesting.
     
    andypants, Indigophoton, Mij and 13 others like this.

Share This Page