It's not just anecdotes though. There's one example of a solid lead in a post above, with the sheep dip causing ME. The next step should surely be to try to confirm or deny this study, right? Look for correlations with the same or similar chemicals in other populations. [Edit: Though looking more into that, even though news articles and the study refer to ME or CFS, the study says "It should be noted that the questionnaire provided an assessment of CF and not CFS". But even if the link is to CF instead, then pesticide links to CF should be further investigated.]
Yes. But I think it needs to be a cluster of recent cases. With old cases, records are lost, people involved have died and memories have faded... And you aren't just up against a pathogen without a public relations budget and a legal team, your opposition is a wealthy agrichemical company that has a lot to lose if you show that their product is harming people.

It's unscientific to look at that and think we're now perfect and industry is only pumping out the safest of chemicals after learning its lessons. (I know/think you personally aren't calling me a Luddite, but that'd be my response to someone that does think that.)
For the avoidance of doubt, definitely not calling you a Luddite. And I'm very much in favour of us chucking ideas around, recounting our onset experiences. And of course there will continue to be discoveries about chemicals that cause harm - the latest I think is that product used for kitchen benches that causes silicosis for the people who cut it and breathe in fine particles. I think speculation and discussion is good. The problem is when we see material produced by ME/CFS advocates presenting these ideas as facts. I've seen the harm to credibility done by claims that ME/CFS is caused by microwaves and aluminium pots.
 
Last edited:
Sorry my memories is so bad, but isn’t there the example of a South East Asian country with a high level of ME/CFS that is linked to a particular insecticide?herbicide? There was a thread on it here.

[added I was referring to South Korea, where Koreans with ME/CFS had been exposed to chemicals put into humidifiers to prevent microbial overgrowth resulting in increased levels of ME/CFS

See https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36916046/ for a study using two day CPET previously posted in a thread here. ]
 
Last edited:
Widespread impacts to precipitation of the East Palestine Ohio train accident
19 June 2024
David A Gay, Katelan Blaydes, James J Schauer, Martin Shafer

Abstract
On 3 February 2023, a Norfolk Southern train derailment occurred in East Palestine, Ohio. The accident and subsequent fire resulted in the emissions of large amounts of hazardous compounds to the ambient atmosphere over many days. We used precipitation chemistry measurements routinely collected by the National Atmospheric Deposition Program (NADP) to estimate the spatial extent and chemical compounds deposited as a result of the accident. Our measurements revealed a large areal impact from the Midwest through the Northeast and likely Canada, and perhaps as far south as North Carolina (portions of 16 states, 1.4 million km2). Observations showed the expected high chloride concentrations, but also unexpectedly high pH (basic) and exceptionally elevated levels of base cations exceeding 99th percentiles versus the historic record. These results were consistent with the meteorological conditions and atmospheric trajectories, and were not due to highly-concentrated low volume precipitation samples or wildfires. The robust measurements of the NADP network clearly show that the impacts of the fire were larger in scale and scope than the initial predictions, and likely due to the uplift from the fire itself entraining pollutants into the atmosphere. A more detailed evaluation of the accident and resulting fire could further refine the full impact of the atmospheric concentrations, dry and wet deposition, and the more specific extent of the spatial impact.

"From these two maps, it is very clear that extreme concentrations of multiple pollutants were present over a widespread area during the days after the accident, and resulted in enhanced deposition of these pollutants to aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems, including the Lakes Michigan, Erie, Ontario, and likely Huron and Superior.

From Wikipedia:

"residents report that pets and animals as far as 10 miles (16 km) from the derailment site died overnight during the controlled release of vinyl chloride.[57] In late March, CBS News reported that inhabitants have continued to experience health symptoms, despite officials asserting that no harmful chemicals were detected in the air or water. Employees of the CDC who investigated the derailment in early March also experienced symptoms.[58]"
 
This may have been posted elsewhere but this article by Cort Johnson discusses recent research comparing GWI and ME/CFS in relation to exercise and environmental toxins:

The Great Divide: Are ME/CFS and Gulf War Illness Fundamentally Different When it Comes to Exercise?
https://www.healthrising.org/blog/2024/06/16/divide-chronic-fatigue-syndrome-gulf-war-ilness/

I don’t know if any of the research referred to requires its own thread.

[added the South Korean study Cort references on Korans with ME/CFS following exposure to chemicals used in humidifiers was previously posted on this thread ]
 
Last edited:
added the South Korean study Cort references on Korans with ME/CFS following exposure to chemicals used in humidifiers was previously posted on this thread

The potential link to humidifier disinfectants seems to be based on this survey, though I can't find it online:
Korean Society of Epidemiology Household survey for the victims due to humidifier disinfectants. 2020

----

Cort's blog is partly talking about how GWI and ME/CFS may be different because not all people with GWI have abnormal 2-day CPET:
Indeed, some earlier studies suggested that when it came to postexertional malaise, GWI might be very different from ME/CFS

But this seems like the same thing as long COVID vs. ME. After some inciting event (sarin gas/pesticides or SARS-CoV-2 exposure) many people develop long term symptoms, but not everyone has the symptom of exercise intolerance.

It's a weird comparison, like comparing "complications after falling off a cliff" and "brain damage" and saying these two are not the same thing because not all people who fell off a cliff have brain damage but all people who have brain damage do have brain damage.

A better comparison would be, how different are GWI and long COVID.

Health Rising said:
His 2020 study, “Post-Exertional Malaise in Veterans with Gulf War Illness“, found that about half the GWI patients experienced post-exertional malaise (PEM) after an exercise trial while the other half didn’t.

Cook’s latest, more comprehensive post-exercise PEM GWI study also found no evidence that exercise impacted symptoms, pain sensitivity or cognitive performance; i.e. it did not produce PEM (!). The study reported that while some GWI patients did report increased symptoms (PEM) after exercise, the group as a whole (n=40) did not.

“Undesirable effects such as symptom exacerbation were observed for some participants, but the group-level risk of PEM following light-, moderate-, or vigorous-intensity exercise was no greater than seated rest. These findings challenge several prior views about PEM and lend support to a broader body of literature showing that the benefits of exercise outweigh the risks.”

The finding of that no PEM after exercise in GWI will surely trigger calls for graded exercise therapy, but a large cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)/ exercise GWI clinical trial found that it produced only “modest” – and it was quite modest – help.

It's strange to say "while some GWI patients did report increased symptoms (PEM)" and then a couple sentences later "The finding of that no PEM after exercise in GWI".

The Korean study seemed to extend the 2-day CPET findings to toxin-induced ME/CFS, while Cook’s study found no evidence of exercise-induced damage to energy production in people with an obvious toxin injury in Gulf War Illness.

This is despite the fact that, symptomatically, GWI looks exactly like ME/CFS.

This all is odd. Even if the Korean study used people that got ME after humidifier disinfectant exposure, which it's unclear they did, presumably not every person who got symptoms after HD exposure got ME. Likewise Cook's study found evidence of PEM in some people with GWI, not "no evidence".

And the last sentence ("symptomatically, GWI looks exactly like ME/CFS") doesn't even make sense if claiming one group has PEM and the other doesn't.

I fear people will take this blog to mean all people with GWI can or should exercise.
 
Last edited:
The Guardian: "Top Canadian scientist alleges in leaked emails he was barred from studying mystery brain illness", 3 June 2024
A leading federal scientist in Canada has alleged he was barred from investigating a mystery brain illness in the province of New Brunswick and said he fears more than 200 people affected by the condition are experiencing unexplained neurological decline.

The allegations, made in leaked emails to a colleague seen by the Guardian, have emerged two years after the eastern province closed its investigation into a possible “cluster” of cases.

“All I will say is that my scientific opinion is that there is something real going on in [New Brunswick] that absolutely cannot be explained by the bias or personal agenda of an individual neurologist,” wrote Michael Coulthart, a prominent microbiologist. “A few cases might be best explained by the latter, but there are just too many (now over 200).”

Coulthart, a veteran scientist who currently heads Canada’s Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease Surveillance System, did not respond to a request for comment by the Guardian. But in the leaked email, he wrote that he believes an “environmental exposure – or a combination of exposures – is triggering and/or accelerating a variety of neurodegenerative syndromes” with people seemingly susceptible to different protein-misfolding ailments, including Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease.

Coulthart argues this phenomenon does not easily fit within “shallow paradigms” of diagnostic pathology and the complexity of the issue has given politicians a “loophole” to conclude “nothing coherent” is going on.

Follow up article: "Second Canadian scientist alleges brain illness investigation was shut down", 21 June 2024
 
Last edited:
The problem is when we see material produced by ME/CFS advocates presenting these ideas as facts.

I hope I don't come across as presenting anything in this thread as fact. My goal is to make people even aware it's a possibility so that maybe actual research can happen which actually can determine if it's a fact. As it stands, research or even discussion about environment causing ME seems to be virtually non-existent, but I think even a low estimate would put the possibility of it being true at least significantly higher than zero.

Of course there's the practical consideration that there is almost zero money to be made in this, as opposed to mechanism and medication research. And as you said, a lot of people that can lose a lot of money. Seems like an injustice to just sweep a real possibility under the rug for who knows how long, maybe forever, though. We do have government, which is theoretically supposed to do things for the public welfare, not to make money.

Is it counterproductive to advocate for it? Maybe, or maybe current mechanism research will never find a solution but looking for a toxin will have found it in ten years if we tried, and that should be a discussion all its own, assessing relative benefits and harms of advocating for environmental harms.
 
American Scientist: The Rise of Parkinson's Disease

Published 2020

By E. Ray Dorsey, Todd Sherer, Michael S. Okun, Bastiaan R. Bloem

"Neither our increased awareness of the disease nor our lengthening life spans can fully account for the upsurge in diagnoses that we now face. Our knowledge of another neurological disorder, multiple sclerosis, has increased too, and we have improved diagnostic tools for it. Rates for multiple sclerosis have indeed gone up, but that increase is nothing like the exponential rise of Parkinson’s (see figure below). As for aging, more people are, of course, living longer. For example, from 1900 to 2014, the number of individuals over age 65 in the United Kingdom increased about sixfold. However, over that same period, the number of deaths due to Parkinson’s disease increased almost three times faster."

upload_2024-7-14_18-57-57.jpeg
The increase in the number of Parkinson’s disease cases in England cannot be explained by an aging population or better diagnosis alone. Multiple sclerosis, another neurological disease, also has comparably improved diagnostics, but has not seen the exponential rise observed in Parkinson’s deaths. Changes in coding in the 1980s likely contributed to the fluctuations in deaths recorded during this period. As for age, the rate of increase in Parkinson’s far outpaces the increase in the elderly population in the United Kingdom.
Figure adapted from R. Dorsey et al., 2020.

---

"While industrialization has increased incomes and life expectancies around the world, its products and by-products are also likely increasing the rates of Parkinson’s. Air pollution began to worsen in England in the 1700s, metal production and its harmful fumes increased in the 1800s, the use of industrial chemicals rose in the 1920s, and synthetic pesticides—many of which are nerve toxins—were introduced in the 1940s. All are linked to Parkinson’s—people with the most exposure have higher rates of the disease than the general population.

The evidence for this connection is overwhelming. Countries that have experienced the least industrialization have the lowest rates of the disease, whereas those that are undergoing the most rapid transformation, such as China, have the highest rates of increase. Specific metals, pesticides, and other chemicals have all been tied to Parkinson’s in numerous human studies. When animals are exposed to many of these substances in lab experiments, they develop the typical characteristics of the disease.

Agricultural areas have the highest rates of Parkinson’s. In Nebraska, the rates of the disease are two to four times higher in the state’s rural, agricultural parts than in urban Omaha, according to a 2004 study in Movement Disorders. In Canada, investigators have found an almost perfect correlation between areas with the highest pesticide use and the highest rates of disease, as documented in a 1987 study in the Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences. In France, rural areas have the highest rates of Parkinson’s, as do the regions with the most vineyards, which often require intense pesticide use, according to a 2017 study in the European Journal of Epidemiology.

Farmers who are exposed to certain pesticides have a higher risk of developing the disease. In one 1998 study published in Neurology, the risk of developing the disease for farmers was 170 percent greater than that for nonfarmers. And the longer farmers have worked with pesticides, the greater their risk."

---

"The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) had at one time proposed banning one of the chemicals that is tied to Parkinson’s, a solvent called trichloroethylene. But after lobbying by the chemical industry, the EPA decided in 2017 to postpone the ban indefinitely. The uses of trichloroethylene have been so numerous and widespread—in washing away grease, cleaning silicon wafers, removing spots in dry cleaning, and even, until the 1970s, decaffeinating coffee—that almost all of us have been exposed to it at some point in our lives. Some of these uses continue today. Almost half of Superfund sites—land so polluted that the EPA or the responsible parties have to clean it up—are contaminated with trichloroethylene. Thousands of other sites are polluted across the country.

As a result, as reported by the EPA, up to 30 percent of the U.S. drinking water supply has been contaminated with trichloroethylene. Because it readily evaporates from groundwater and soil, the solvent, like radon, can enter homes or offices through the air, undetected. Parkinson’s is not even the most concerning safety risk. According to the EPA, trichloroethylene also causes cancer.

But trichloroethylene is only one dangerous chemical that we have failed to protect ourselves against. Paraquat is a pesticide so toxic that 32 countries, including China, have banned it. Exposure to the chemical increases the risk of Parkinson’s by 150 percent, according to a 2011 study in Environmental Health Perspectives. Yet the EPA has done little. And as the agency charged with protecting our environment sits, paraquat’s use on U.S. agricultural fields has doubled over the past decade, according to data from the U.S. Geological Survey’s Pesticide National Synthesis Project.

The nerve toxin chlorpyrifos is the most widely used insecticide in the country, drenching golf courses and dozens of crops, including almonds, cotton, grapes, oranges, and apples. It has been linked not only to Parkinson’s but also to problems with brain development in children. Again, the EPA has shelved a ban. When a federal court stepped in to take action against the chemical, the Trump administration appealed. And in July 2019, in response to a court ordering a final ruling, the EPA decided that it would allow continued use of chlorpyrifos."

---

"Even though it was banned half a century ago, DDT persists in the environment—and in our food supply. It becomes more concentrated as it makes its way up the chain to human consumption. The pesticide is then stored in our fatty tissues.

In 2003 and 2004, more than 30 years after the insecticide was banned, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) tested the blood of about 2,000 people ages 12 and older. The researchers were looking for DDT and its metabolite, or breakdown product, dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene (DDE). They found in their 2009 report that “a small proportion of the population had measurable DDT [and] most of the [U.S.] population had detectable DDE” in their blood. For Parkinson’s, what matters more are the concentrations of chemicals in the brain, which may be several times those in blood, according to the Extension Toxicology Network, because DDT dissolves in fat."

---

"Vietnam veterans and up to 4 million Vietnamese came into contact with Agent Orange during the Vietnam War.

There has been no large-scale study of the effect of this exposure on the health of the Vietnamese or war veterans. Smaller studies, however, have linked Agent Orange to many problems in these populations, including birth defects, cancer, and Parkinson’s, as summarized in a 2007 paper in Science by Richard Stone of the Veterans Health Administration. The evidence is sufficient that veterans who were exposed to Agent Orange and now have Parkinson’s are eligible for disability compensation and health care from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs."
 
The more I learn, the more mad I get. The world is being drenched in thousands of newly created chemicals and every day more are being created. For some reason, the standard operating precedure is to release new chemicals after cursory safety studies, then decades later when people start dropping from disease, it's the people's responsibility to prove the chemical did it. And then if common sense manages to beat out the massive corporations and their expensive lawyers and their lobbyists, then maybe the chemical gets banned, and the company gets a little fine - cost of doing business. And then on to the next one.

It's not even practically possible to test for all the possible long term effects of the massive variety of chemicals being produced. The assumption is that they don't cause cancer or Parkinson's or Alzheimer's, until someone proves they do.

Maybe if the ones making these decisions were some unbiased altruistic machines, I would trust these risks and tradeoffs. But the ones making the decisions are extremely biased. And extremely powerful. They can pay to put their chemicals on the market and pay to keep them there. And pay for the propaganda to convince the world it's all good.

I am horrified. Until the world has some sort of awakening and paradigm shift, we'll be chasing our tails making drugs to treat symptoms as they come up one after another like whack-a-mole.
 
Last edited:
I found a couple journals that are dedicated to environmental toxicity and related topics.

Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology

"JESEE publishes novel results and significant advances in exposure science, exposure analysis, and environmental epidemiology to understand human health impacts of the full range of environmental stressors (chemical, biological, physical, psychosocial). JESEE is particularly interested in publishing research that integrates exposure knowledge with information from across scientific disciplines to contribute solutions for the most pressing environmental and public health concerns."

Environmental Toxicology

"Environmental Toxicology is an international journal providing a forum for academics to discuss the toxicity and toxicology of environmental pollutants. We investigate the substances affecting our air, dust, sediment, soil and water, covering ecotoxicity, soil contamination, air & water pollution, endocrine disruption, immunotoxicity, & more.

Our journal aims to improve all species lives on Earth. We consider natural toxins and their impacts as well as the impacts of anthropogenic chemicals. These topics are studied in relation to public health and environmental policies that keep us safe."

Edit: More journals:

Journal of Environmental Exposure Assessment

"Humans are exposed to a wide range of chemical contaminants from cradle to grave. Evaluating the risk to health from this requires accurate assessment of the timing, pathways, and magnitude of exposure. The Journal of Environmental Exposure Assessment welcomes high quality manuscripts that address all aspects of human exposure to organic and inorganic chemical contaminants. These include but are not limited to: exposure modelling, experimental biomonitoring studies, as well as those examining external exposure via different pathways such as diet, inhalation, drinking water, dermal uptake, and indoor dust ingestion."

Toxics

"The Journal accepts papers describing work that furthers our understanding of the exposure, effects, and risks of chemicals and materials in humans and the natural environment as well as approaches to assess and/or manage the toxicological and ecotoxicological risks of chemicals and materials. The journal covers a wide range of toxic substances, including metals, pesticides, pharmaceuticals, biocides, nanomaterials, and polymers such as micro- and mesoplastics."
 
Last edited:
Toward cleaner air and better health: Current state, challenges, and priorities

Wei Huang, Hongbing Xu, Jing Wu, Minghui Ren, Yang Ke, Jie Qiao

Published 25 July 2024


Abstract
The most up-to-date estimate of the global burden of disease indicates that ambient air pollution, including fine particulate matter and ozone, contributes to an estimated 5.2 million deaths each year. In this review, we highlight the challenges in estimating population exposure to air pollution and attributable health risks, particularly in low- and middle-income countries and among vulnerable populations. To protect public health, the evidence so far confirms urgent needs to prioritize interdisciplinary research on air pollution exposure and risk assessment and to develop evidence-based intervention policies and risk communication strategies. Here, we synthesize the emerging evidence supporting the monitoring and evaluation of the progress in implementation of the Global Air Quality Guidelines prepared by the World Health Organization.

Link (Science)
 
From above article:

"Globally, [noncommunicable diseases] have become the most common cause of death and disability, and they are increasing in incidence, accounting for nearly 41 million deaths per year, with 77% occurring in [low and middle income countries] (7). Although age-standardized rates of NCDs have been declining in LMICs such as China in response to advances in treatment and healthcare coverage, the overall burden of disease remains severe, in part because of lifestyle changes and aging (8, 9). Ambient air pollution is recognized as the single biggest environmental risk factor for NCDs, and currently nearly 99% of the global population is continuously exposed to poor air quality that exceeds [Global Air Quality Guidelines] limits (10)."

The article is from a just released special issue of Science dedicated to air pollution.
 
From Jarred Younger's weekly YouTube update, concerning pollution:

Jarred Younger just released a followup video to this:



AI generated summary:
  • Introduction
    • Dr. Younger presents new results from his laboratory
    • Focus on how air quality may affect ME/CFS and fibromyalgia fatigue and pain
    • Results are pending peer review and publication
    • Study conducted by students Chloe Jones, Olivia Haskin, and Gregory Lashley
  • Background on Air Quality and Health
    • Poor air quality is a known significant health risk
    • HEPA filters in central air systems help mitigate risks
    • Severe air quality issues can affect even healthy individuals
    • Less severe air quality problems can affect sensitive individuals
    • Conditions like rheumatoid arthritis, sickle cell anemia, and other chronic inflammatory/autoimmune disorders can be affected by air quality
    • No previous studies on air quality effects on ME/CFS
  • Particulate Matter (PM) and Air Quality Index (AQI)
    • Particulate matter categorized by size: PM10, PM2.5, and PM1
    • PM10: Larger particles like construction site dust
    • PM2.5: Smaller particles like diesel combustion products
    • PM1: Very small particles, including some viruses and bacteria
    • HEPA filters typically target particles 3 microns and larger
    • AQI color-coded system: Green (good) to Purple (hazardous)
  • Study Details
    • 58 women with ME/CFS participated
    • Data collected before COVID-19 pandemic
    • Participants reported symptoms for an average of 62 consecutive days
    • Atmospheric and climate data collected for corresponding days
    • Approximately 3,500 paired samples for analysis
    • Focus on self-reported pain and fatigue severity
  • Key Findings
    • Fatigue severity positively correlated with PM10 levels
    • Pain severity positively correlated with AQI
    • Even small variations in air quality affected ME/CFS symptoms
    • Results were statistically significant despite limitations
  • Study Limitations and Future Research
    • Limited to a few months in Alabama with relatively stable air quality
    • Did not assess microclimate (individual's immediate environment)
    • Future studies could:
      • Use proper monitoring equipment in participants' homes
      • Include participants from various global locations
      • Track indoor vs. outdoor time
      • Analyze blood samples for inflammatory markers
  • Hypothesized Mechanism
    • Particulates in lungs may trigger inflammatory response
    • Systemic inflammation may cause exacerbation of fatigue and pain
    • Further analysis of blood samples for inflammatory markers planned
  • Recommendations Based on Preliminary Findings
    • Regularly check and replace HEPA filters in central air systems
    • Consider using a home air quality monitor
    • Be cautious of cheaper monitors that may exaggerate sensitivity and accuracy
    • Professional house inspection for air quality can be expensive but comprehensive
  • Conclusion
    • Air quality appears to contribute to ME/CFS symptom severity
    • Not likely a cause of ME/CFS, but may exacerbate symptoms
    • Further research needed to determine the extent of impact
    • Results support considering air quality as a factor in managing ME/CFS
---

Hopefully we see some good controlling for weather in the final paper, maybe like temperature in the days before the symptom log.
 
Last edited:
Food & Water Watch, Inc., et al. v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
United States District Court, Northern District of California

Excerpts from FINDINGS OF FACT AND
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
(Filed 24 September 2024):

"There is little dispute in this suit as to whether fluoride poses a hazard to human health. Indeed, EPA’s own expert agrees that fluoride is hazardous at some level of exposure. And ample evidence establishes that a mother’s exposure to fluoride during pregnancy is associated with IQ decrements in her offspring."

---

"The pooled benchmark dose analysis concluded that a 1-point drop in IQ of a child is to be expected for each 0.28 mg/L of fluoride in a pregnant mother’s urine. This is highly concerning, because maternal urinary fluoride levels for pregnant mothers in the United States range from 0.8 mg/L at the median and 1.89 mg/L depending upon the degree of exposure. Not only is there an insufficient margin between the hazard level and these exposure levels, for many, the exposure levels exceed the hazard level of 0.28 mg/L."

---

"Thus, the Court finds Plaintiffs have met their burden in establishing, by a preponderance of the evidence, that community water fluoridation at 0.7 mg/L presents an unreasonable risk of injury to health under Amended TSCA and that the EPA is thus obliged to take regulatory action in response. The Court does not in this order prescribe what that response should be."

---

Edit: CBS News: Federal court rules against EPA in lawsuit over fluoride in water

Response to NIH report from American Academy of Pediatrics: AAP stands by recommendations for low fluoride levels to prevent caries

Edit 2: Shortened post
 
Last edited:
Possibly a real result here, but it's not the most convincing study because of the tiny sample size w/o control group, and the different results between genders and between arms. And they didn't mention doing multiple test correction.

First Evidence of the Possible Influence of Avoiding Daily Liquid Intake from Plastic and Glass Beverage Bottles on Blood Pressure in Healthy Volunteers, 2024, Geppner et al
"Abstract
[...] Eight adult and healthy participants abstained from consuming commercially produced bottled beverages and restricted their primary fluid intake to tap water. Blood pressure was measured on both sides before, after 14 days and after 28 to 30 days of this partial plastic diet. Women exhibit a significant change in systolic blood pressure on the right arm after 2 and 4 weeks, while the left arm demonstrates no significant changes in blood pressure. On the contrary, in men, systolic blood pressure values on both arms show no significant alterations, attributable to the high variability across the three participants. Moreover, no significant differences in systolic blood pressure were observed when analysing the entire cohort. Significant findings are evident only at the two-week mark for diastolic blood pressure for all participants in both arms. When considering diastolic blood pressure separately for women and men, men again show no significant changes in blood pressure on either arm. However, women exhibit a significant decrease in diastolic blood pressure on the left arm after 2 weeks and a statistically significant decline in diastolic blood pressure on the right arm after both 2 and 4 weeks. The results of the study suggest, for the first time, that a reduction in plastic use could potentially lower blood pressure, probably due to the reduced volume of plastic particles in the bloodstream. [...]"

Some other interesting research mentioned in the discussion section:
Notably, multiple types of phthalates have been identified in plastic bottled water, including in commercially available products from Saudi Arabia and Spain, irrespective of brand [49,50].

The exposure of mice to di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), one of the commonly found phthalates, is known to increase their systolic blood pressure and heart rate [51]. Moreover, Wu and colleagues [52] have reported that exposure to phthalates during late pregnancy is associated with elevated blood pressure in affected women, as well as long-term changes in blood pressure trajectories.

A correlation between elevated urinary phthalate concentrations and cardiovascular diseases, such as type 2 diabetes and hypertension, has been shown in Australian men [53]. Additionally, a correlation between elevated phthalate concentrations and blood pressure levels has been demonstrated in Chinese adults aged 22–36 years [54]. The link between heightened phthalate levels and cardiovascular disease was also established in research conducted in the United States [55,56].
 
Given the abundance of micro/nano plastics in the watershed, and the plastics in the treatment/delivery systems, maybe tap water contains similar amounts of phthalates. I don't feel like reading the article, but did they analyse the "tap water"?

Since (I assume) this isn't double-blind, then the people who were convinced that water from plastic bottles was harming them might be less stressed when knowing they're drinking "safe" tapwater instead.
 
Given the abundance of micro/nano plastics in the watershed, and the plastics in the treatment/delivery systems, maybe tap water contains similar amounts of phthalates. I don't feel like reading the article, but did they analyse the "tap water"?

Since (I assume) this isn't double-blind, then the people who were convinced that water from plastic bottles was harming them might be less stressed when knowing they're drinking "safe" tapwater instead.

Here's the bit about their reasoning around tap water:
Few or no plastic particles have been found in tap water in several countries, e.g., in Spain, Germany, the Netherlands, Denmark, and Norway [36,37,38,39,40]. However, some exceptions may exist depending on whether the tap water derives from surface waters or groundwater, as seen in a particular region of China or in the Barcelona metropolitan area where a significant amount of plastic particles were detected [36,41].

Based on this literature research, it was hypothesized that daily tap water consumption could significantly decrease plastic usage. A microplastic analysis of tap water was not conducted on the assumption that the number of microplastic particles in tap water would be significantly lower than in beverage products packaged in plastic bottles. The responsible representatives of the waterworks in Austria have made a clear statement: “Microplastics could not be detected in Austrian drinking water,” which aligns with the current understanding of drinking water research [42]. To the best of our knowledge, there is no evidence to suggest that microplastics are present in drinking water in Krems City or elsewhere in Austria. Therefore, in this pilot study, participants obtained their daily fluid requirements exclusively from tap water while refraining from consuming plastic and commercially produced bottled water. The initial results of blood pressure were recorded before and after following a partial plastic diet for a minimum of four weeks.

I agree, there may be a placebo effect. I mainly was interested in the quoted listing of previous research on the harms of phtalates, though I have yet to look at any of it.
 
Studies based on assumptions aren't properly scientific. If the study is about phthalates in water, they should do at least a couple of measurements of phthalate content of the waters consumed. Maybe one source of "clean" groundwater is actually heavily contaminated due to some forgotten landfill leaching into a forgotten well. It's probably fairly easy to create studies that lead to amazing headlines, but which are misleading or meaningless, just by making a few assumptions in the study.
 
[Medical clinical diagnostics for indoor mould exposure - Update 2023 (AWMF Register No. 161/001)]

This article is an abridged version of the updated AWMF mould guideline "Medical clinical diagnostics in case of indoor mould exposure - Update 2023", presented in July 2023 by the German Society of Hygiene, Environmental Medicine and Preventive Medicine (Gesellschaft für Hygiene, Umweltmedizin und Präventivmedizin, GHUP), in collaboration with German and Austrian scientific medical societies, and experts. Indoor mould growth is a potential health risk, even if a quantitative and/or causal relationship between the occurrence of individual mould species and health problems has yet to be established.
Sufficient evidence for an association between moisture/mould damage and the following health effects has been established for: allergic respiratory diseases, allergic rhinitis, allergic rhino-conjunctivitis, allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA), other allergic bronchopulmonary mycosis (ABPM), aspergilloma, Aspergillus bronchitis, asthma (manifestation, progression, exacerbation), bronchitis (acute, chronic), community-acquired Aspergillus pneumonia, hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP; extrinsic allergic alveolitis (EEA)), invasive Aspergillosis, mycoses, organic dust toxic syndrome (ODTS) [workplace exposure], promotion of respiratory infections, pulmonary aspergillosis (subacute, chronic), and rhinosinusitis (acute, chronically invasive, or granulomatous, allergic). In this context the sensitizing potential of moulds is obviously low compared to other environmental allergens. Recent studies show a comparatively low sensitization prevalence of 3-22,5 % in the general population across Europe.
Limited or suspected evidence for an association exist with respect to atopic eczema (atopic dermatitis, neurodermatitis; manifestation), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), mood disorders, mucous membrane irritation (MMI), odor effects, and sarcoidosis.
Inadequate or insufficient evidence for an association exist for acute idiopathic pulmonary hemorrhage in infants, airborne transmitted mycotoxicosis, arthritis, autoimmune diseases, cancer, chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), endocrinopathies, gastrointestinal effects, multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS), multiple sclerosis, neuropsychological effects, neurotoxic effects, renal effects, reproductive disorders, rheumatism, sick building syndrome (SBS), sudden infant death syndrome, teratogenicity, thyroid diseases, and urticaria.

Link

Edit: PDF of full review in German

Translated section on CFS:
In contrast to the syndromes discussed previously, only a few studies address a possible connection between moisture/mold exposure indoors and CFS [24, 214, 662]. Here too, it must be taken into account that the etiology of CFS is assumed to be multifactorial with biological, social and psychological factors [375]. In addition, the Committee on the Diagnostic Criteria for Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, Board on the Health of Select Populations, Institute of Medicine has issued a 304-page statement on the subject of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome [109], in which terms such as mold, mycotoxins or MVOC are not mentioned.

To date, there is insufficient evidence of an etiological connection with moisture/mold exposure indoors for the environmental medical syndromes SBS, MCS and CFS [286]. In summary, it can be stated that there is sufficient evidence for a connection between moisture/mold exposure indoors and clinical pictures that, by definition, can be correctly assigned to BRI (Building Related Illness) if there is a clear exposure-related connection [366]. This includes, to a limited extent, the diseases listed in Table 4 in Chapter 2.3 Health problems and diseases caused by mold under “Sufficient evidence for an association”.

Inadequate or insufficient evidence, however, exists for a connection between moisture/mold exposure indoors and the environmental medical syndromes SBS, MCS and CFS (see Table 4 in Chapter 2.3 Health problems and diseases caused by mold). Newly coined terms, such as biotoxicosis and mold and dampness hypersensitivity syndrome (MDHS) [719, 728] or volatoxins [47], suggest a nosological specificity of a pathophysiological connection for which there is currently no evidence.

24. Anyanwu E, Campbell AW, Jones J, Ehiri JE, Akpan AI. The neurological
significance of abnormal natural killer cell activity in chronic toxigenic mold
exposures
. ScientificWorldJournal 2003; 3: 1128-1137; doi:
10.1100/tsw.2003.98

214. Gharibzadeh S, Hoseini SS. Is there any relation between moldy building
exposure and chronic fatigue syndrome?
Med Hypotheses 2006; 66(6): 1243-
1244; doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2006.01.028

662. Somppi TL.Non-Thyroidal Illness Syndrome in Patients Exposed to Indoor Air
Dampness Microbiota Treated Successfully with Triiodothyronine
. Front
Immunol 2017; 8: 919; doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00919
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom