ahimsa
Senior Member (Voting Rights)
Small study, but I thought it was interesting how well N95 respirators worked without any fit testing. I remember at the beginning of the pandemic there was a lot of concern about how well these type of masks would work for the average person without any fit testing.
Measuring the fitted filtration efficiency of cloth masks, medical masks and respirators
Amanda A. Tomkins, Gurleen Dulai, Ranmeet Dulai, Sarah Rassenberg, Darren Lawless, Scott Laengert, Rebecca S. Rudman, Shiblul Hasan, Charles-Francois de Lannoy, Ken G. Drouillard, Catherine M. Clase
Published: April 21, 2025
Abstract
Importance
Masks reduce transmission of SARS-CoV2 and other respiratory pathogens. Comparative studies of the fitted filtration efficiency of different types of masks are scarce.
Objective
To describe the fitted filtration efficiency against small aerosols (0.02–1 µm) of medical and non-medical masks and respirators when worn, and how this is affected by user modifications (hacks) and by overmasking with a cloth mask.
Design
We tested a 2-layer woven-cotton cloth mask of a consensus design, ASTM-certified level 1 and level 3 masks, a non-certified mask, KF94s, KN95s, an N95 and a CaN99.
Setting
Closed rooms with ambient particles supplemented by salt particles.
Participants
12 total participants; 21–55 years, 68% female, 77% white, NIOSH 1–10.
Main Outcome and Measure
Using standard methods and a PortaCount 8038, we counted 0.02–1 µm particles inside and outside masks and respirators, expressing results as the percentage filtered by each mask. We also studied level 1 and level 3 masks with earguards, scrub caps, the knot-and-tuck method, and the effects of braces or overmasking with a cloth mask.
Results
Filtration efficiency for the cloth mask was 47–55%, for level 1 masks 52–60%, for level 3 masks 60–77%. A non-certified KN95 look-alike, two KF94s, and three KN95s filtered 57–77%, and the N95 and CaN99 97–98% without fit testing. External braces and overmasking with a well-fitting cloth mask increased filtration, but earguards, scrub caps, and the knot-and-tuck method did not.
Measuring the fitted filtration efficiency of cloth masks, medical masks and respirators
Amanda A. Tomkins, Gurleen Dulai, Ranmeet Dulai, Sarah Rassenberg, Darren Lawless, Scott Laengert, Rebecca S. Rudman, Shiblul Hasan, Charles-Francois de Lannoy, Ken G. Drouillard, Catherine M. Clase
Published: April 21, 2025
Abstract
Importance
Masks reduce transmission of SARS-CoV2 and other respiratory pathogens. Comparative studies of the fitted filtration efficiency of different types of masks are scarce.
Objective
To describe the fitted filtration efficiency against small aerosols (0.02–1 µm) of medical and non-medical masks and respirators when worn, and how this is affected by user modifications (hacks) and by overmasking with a cloth mask.
Design
We tested a 2-layer woven-cotton cloth mask of a consensus design, ASTM-certified level 1 and level 3 masks, a non-certified mask, KF94s, KN95s, an N95 and a CaN99.
Setting
Closed rooms with ambient particles supplemented by salt particles.
Participants
12 total participants; 21–55 years, 68% female, 77% white, NIOSH 1–10.
Main Outcome and Measure
Using standard methods and a PortaCount 8038, we counted 0.02–1 µm particles inside and outside masks and respirators, expressing results as the percentage filtered by each mask. We also studied level 1 and level 3 masks with earguards, scrub caps, the knot-and-tuck method, and the effects of braces or overmasking with a cloth mask.
Results
Filtration efficiency for the cloth mask was 47–55%, for level 1 masks 52–60%, for level 3 masks 60–77%. A non-certified KN95 look-alike, two KF94s, and three KN95s filtered 57–77%, and the N95 and CaN99 97–98% without fit testing. External braces and overmasking with a well-fitting cloth mask increased filtration, but earguards, scrub caps, and the knot-and-tuck method did not.