1. Sign our petition calling on Cochrane to withdraw their review of Exercise Therapy for CFS here.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Guest, the 'News in Brief' for the week beginning 15th April 2024 is here.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Welcome! To read the Core Purpose and Values of our forum, click here.
    Dismiss Notice

Long COVID Optimal Health Programme (LC-OHP) to enhance psychological and physical health: a feasibility randomised ... protocol, 2022, Al-Jabr et al

Discussion in 'Psychosomatic research - ME/CFS and Long Covid' started by Andy, Apr 26, 2022.

  1. Andy

    Andy Committee Member

    Messages:
    21,944
    Location:
    Hampshire, UK
    ABSTRACT

    Background:

    Long COVID is a collection of symptoms that develop during or following a confirmed or suspected case of COVID-19, that continue for more than 12 weeks. Despite the negative impact of long COVID on people’s lives and functioning, there is no validated treatment or even rehabilitation guidance. What has been recommended thus far, is adoption of holistic management approaches. The Optimal Health Programme (OHP) is a brief 5-session, plus booster, psychosocial programme designed to support mental and physical wellbeing that has been used effectively for a range of chronic conditions.

    Objective:

    This study examines the feasibility and acceptability of employing a specially customised version of OHP (long COVID OHP or LC-OHP) to improve psychological and physical health of people with long COVID.

    Methods:

    This is a feasibility randomised controlled trial. Eligible participants aged 18 years or older who are experiencing symptoms of long COVID will be identified through their secondary practitioners with recruitment to be undertaken by the research team. Sixty participants will be randomised into a control (usual care) or an intervention (LC-OHP) group. Outcomes will be feasibility and acceptability of the programme (primary); and efficacy of the LC-OHP in improving anxiety, depression, fatigue, self-efficacy and quality of life (secondary). Up to 20 participants will be interviewed at the end of the trial to explore their experience with the programme. Quantitative data will be analysed using SPSS and differences between groups will be compared using inferential tests where appropriate. Qualitative data will be transcribed and thematically analysed to identify common emerging themes.

    Results:

    This is an ongoing study which began in November 2021. The study received approval from the University of Suffolk Ethics committee (RETH21/004) and from the NHS Health Research Authority (IRAS no. 304234).

    Conclusions:

    Long COVID has a significant impact on an individual’s mental and physical functioning. The LC-OHP offers a holistic approach that can aid people through recovery and improve self-efficacy. This would ultimately contribute to reducing the unprecedented and unsustainable demand on healthcare services including mental health seen during the pandemic. Clinical Trial: Trial registration number ISRCTN38746119.

    Open access, https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/36673/accepted
     
    Barry, MEMarge, Starlight and 4 others like this.
  2. rvallee

    rvallee Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    12,453
    Location:
    Canada
    Absolute joke. None of this is even close to be serious.
     
    nick2155, Sean, Starlight and 2 others like this.
  3. Hutan

    Hutan Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    26,907
    Location:
    Aotearoa New Zealand
    Hiyam Al-Jabr 1
    Karen Windle 1
    David R Thompson 2
    Zoe Jenkins 3
    David J Castle 4
    Chantal Ski 1

    1 Integrated Care Academy University of Suffolk Ipswich GB
    2 School of Nursing and Midwifery Queen’s University Belfast Belfast GB
    3 Mental Health Service St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne AU
    4 Department of Psychiatry University of Toronto Toronto CA

    Note the Australian and Canadian connections.

    Potential for selection bias, 'standard care' control, no objective outcomes. So, a waste of time as usual.
    They could have had a control where patients have some chats on zoom with others with Long Covid and a facilitator; they could have incorporated activity monitoring.


    It's quite muddy in its objectives, talking about recovery and reduced fatigue, but sort of being happy with just keeping people away from health care services.


     
    MEMarge, Snow Leopard, CRG and 3 others like this.
  4. Hutan

    Hutan Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    26,907
    Location:
    Aotearoa New Zealand
    Ha, it seems people with Long Covid are regarded as too befuddled to contribute to the study design.

    Patient and public involvement

    The OHP was tailored to long COVID with input from the long COVID clinic clinicians (two occupational therapists). In addition, guidance was provided on the mode and timing of questionnaire administration with changes made to processes of administration to ensure participants will be prepared and supported.

    Mindful that the most common symptom of long COVID is fatigue and brain fog, and along with the overall focus of this study (i.e., assessing the feasibility and acceptability of LC-OHP), patients with long COVID were not involved in refining the OHP at this stage. However, feedback from patients who used this programme in previous studies has been implemented to make the programme more succinct, colourful, and visual.

    Additionally, the delivery of the LC- OHP sessions will be arranged at patients’ convenience, in terms of time and mode of delivery. Moreover, the views of patient participants who receive the programme sessions will be collected by interviewing the pilot participants and the intervention participants at the end of the trial, to further implement and adapt the programme to people with long COVID. Finally, members of the public will form part of the trial DMC to monitor the progress of the study and contribute to the dissemination of its findings.​
     
    Arnie Pye, rvallee, MEMarge and 4 others like this.
  5. NelliePledge

    NelliePledge Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    13,276
    Location:
    UK West Midlands
    That’s pathetic
     
    Arnie Pye, rvallee, MEMarge and 6 others like this.
  6. Hutan

    Hutan Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    26,907
    Location:
    Aotearoa New Zealand
    Stand by for a bigger more expensive trial:
    These are the organisations that funded the study - clearly they need some advice on trial design.
     
  7. Sean

    Sean Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    7,193
    Location:
    Australia
    which is thus anticipated to reduce pressure and financial demands on healthcare systems.

    They said the quiet part out loud.
     
    alktipping, Barry, Ariel and 8 others like this.
  8. Snow Leopard

    Snow Leopard Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,827
    Location:
    Australia
    A classic penny-wise pound-stupid approach. All they are doing is showing that they are unwilling to properly treat such patients so they will be disgusted at the lack of progress and stop showing up. This will lead to short term disability not improving and thus translating into very high long-term disability costs.

    The fact that they've failed to bother to ask the patients themselves, nor doctors with decades of expertise dealing with post-viral condition shows the true intent of this study - it isn't to help patients.
     
  9. rvallee

    rvallee Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    12,453
    Location:
    Canada
    Double irony to the fact that it won't even do that. So they are paying money, millions it seems, to remain in place, as it won't change anything. Shmart.
     
  10. Barry

    Barry Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    8,385
    There is something fundamentally broken with a system that allows physical illnesses (including ones not yet proven otherwise) to be researched purely by psychs, especially when they employ trial methodologies which pose risks to participants' physical health due to the investigators' blinkered incompetence. They seem driven primarily to prove themselves right, rather than any great desire to get to discover truths. Seems rotten to the core.
     

Share This Page