Video mentions ME/CFS from B.C, Canada Dr. Birinder Narang just after 2:52 minutes:
https://twitter.com/BirinderNarang/photo
Studies show that one of the most effective ways to encourage people to take prevention measures is to talk about #LongCOVID, so it’s bad that the CDC went out of its way to omit masks on its Long COVID page.
As someone who directly collabed on this page I can confirm that this recommendation was declined
Do these long-term symptoms reduce your ability to carry out day-to-day activities compared with the time before you had COVID-19?
Answer choices: Yes, a lot; Yes, a little; Not at all
While pacing is gaining acceptance, patient groups and doctors say more study is needed, and some experts remain divided about the best treatment approach. One of the largest studies to include pacing, published in the Lancet, found that cognitive behavioral therapy and graded exercise therapy may be better options for some patients. Graded exercise therapy involves a gradual increase in activity over time, but some doctors think it’s too risky for ME/CFS patients.
The study has been widely criticized for its methods. Another analysis of 18,000 survey responses showed that pacing had the highest reported benefit (44 to 82 percent of patients,) while cognitive behavioral therapy helped less (8 to 35 percent). Graded exercise therapy had the highest negative response (54 to 74 percent).
Peter White, the lead author of the Lancet report, said that he stands by the results of the study. He noted that studying recovery or improvement in ME/CFS patients can be difficult because it often relies on subjective criteria. Another issue, he said, may be that some patients aren’t receiving therapy that has been correctly tailored to patients with ME/CFS.
Both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the British National Institute for Health and Care Excellence updated their guidance in the past decade to remove graded exercise therapy as a recommended treatment for ME/CFS.
Oh, FFS I wasn't sure but they actually did it. PACE did not evaluate pacing as the patients mean it. Or evaluate anything, really. It's not even valid to bring it up here, their adaptive pacing thing is not pacing and it's not even a treatment anyway, it's not meant to be used this way.One of the largest studies to include pacing, published in the Lancet
Can ‘Radical Rest’ Help With Long COVID Symptoms?
Jan. 18, 2023 – On March 18, 2020, Megan Fitzgerald was lying on the floor of her Philadelphia home after COVID-19 hit her like a ton of bricks. She had a fever, severe digestive issues, and she couldn’t stand on her own. Yet there she was, splayed out in the bathroom, trying both to respond to work emails and entertain her 3-year-old son, who was attempting to entice her by passing his toys through the door.
She and her husband, both medical researchers, were working from home early in the pandemic with no child care for their toddler. Her husband had a grant application due, so it was all-hands-on-deck for the couple, even when she got sick.
There’s growing evidence that overexertion and not getting enough rest in that acute phase of COVID-19 infection can make longer-term symptoms worse.
“The concept that I would be too sick to work was very alien to me,” Fitzgerald says. “It didn't occur to me that an illness and acute virus could be long-term debilitating.”
Her story is common among long COVID-19 patients, not just for those who get severely ill but also those who only have moderate symptoms. It’s why many medical experts and researchers who specialize in long COVID rehabilitation recommend what’s known as radical rest – a term popularized by journalist and long COVID advocate Fiona Lowenstein – right after infection as well as a way of coping with the debilitating fatigue and crashes of energy that many have in the weeks, months, and years after getting sick.
https://www.webmd.com/covid/news/20230118/can-radical-rest-help-long-covid-symptoms?src=RSS_PUBLIC
It is so frustrating that we don’t have any data about whether ‘radical rest’ is helpful or not. It really should have been addressed decades ago for ME.
It seems to me the options are:
The PACE true believers would argue that 1 is the case, but decades of their research into GET/CBT has produced no evidence that they are able to get us sustainably more active or that increasing activity results long term in any improvement in the underlying condition.
- Rest is harmful to us
- Rest has no impact on the short term or long term course of the condition
- Rest is necessary to avoid triggering PEM, short term worsening
- Rest is necessary to avoid long term system exacerbation
- Appropriate rest levels is necessary to allow maximal functioning within an individual’s current activity limits
- Rest/pacing creates the best circumstances to allow any spontaneous recovery to occur, may be within upper activity limit, may vary with where the individual is at within the course of their underlying condition
- Rest actively promotes recovery
Most people with ME would argue that their experience is consistent with 1 and 2 being false and 3, 4 and 5 being true. We would argue that our experience indicates incontrovertibly that rest as part of activity management is necessary to avoid either short term or long term deterioration. Survey evidence of harm arising from GET/CBT could also be seen as in directed evidence for 3, 4 and 5 being true.
What might be harder to obtain any consensus about is for 6 or 7, whether rest can be used to ultimately increase activity, though worryingly specialist services are increasingly heading towards the idea of ‘pacing up’. We lack any evidence relating to 6 or 7.
I hope not a lot of resources get wasted on this because it's a complete dead-end with a policy of mass reinfection combined with a virus that can be asymptomatic or so mild it's barely noticeable. The only way this would work would be if this were given to everyone, every time they got ill, which is fantasy.Article by Katherine J. Wu on antiviral treatment to reduce chances of developing Long Covid
The Atlantic: Trying to Stop Long COVID Before It Even Starts
quote:
For anyone who is newly infected, “we don’t have any interventions that are known to work,” says Akiko Iwasaki, an immunologist and long-COVID researcher at Yale.
Some researchers are hopeful that the forecast might shift soon. A pair of recent preprint studies, both now under review for publication in scientific journals, hint that two long-COVID-preventing pills might already be on our pharmacy shelves: the antiviral Paxlovid and metformin, an affordable drug commonly used for treating type 2 diabetes. When taken early in infection, each seems to at least modestly trim the chance of developing long COVID—by 42 percent, in the case of metformin. Neither set of results is a slam dunk.
I agree. The best way to avoid Long Covid must be to avoid Covid.I hope not a lot of resources get wasted on this because it's a complete dead-end with a policy of mass reinfection combined with a virus that can be asymptomatic or so mild it's barely noticeable. The only way this would work would be if this were given to everyone, every time they got ill, which is fantasy.
As a research lead, definitely, but using this in real life this way as prophylactic is nonsense. If it's validated, we need to study this to know how it does this, to target the underlying mechanism in an investigative process, not the current everyone-working-in-isolation on their small thing with zero coordination with anyone.