Opinion Lessons from a Neurologist After 25 Years of Functional Neurological Disorder Subspeciality Practice 2023 Stone

Andy

Retired committee member
Abstract

The idea that a neurologist would do an 'FND clinic' or that functional neurological disorder (FND) could be a subspecialty of neurology would have been outlandish even 20 years ago but has become a reality in many places around the world. In this personal review, I reflect on 25 years of being a neurologist with an interest in FND, initially as a research fellow and later as a consultant/attending. I review lessons from diagnosis and management in the hope that they may assist other neurologists embarking on a similar career as well as other health professionals whose roles overlap.

Paywall, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0733861923000051
 
Abstract

The idea that a neurologist would do an 'FND clinic' or that functional neurological disorder (FND) could be a subspecialty of neurology would have been outlandish even 20 years ago but has become a reality in many places around the world. In this personal review, I reflect on 25 years of being a neurologist with an interest in FND, initially as a research fellow and later as a consultant/attending. I review lessons from diagnosis and management in the hope that they may assist other neurologists embarking on a similar career as well as other health professionals whose roles overlap.

Paywall, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0733861923000051
Jon Stone is the one with a seriously-weird website: https://neurosymptoms.org/en/
 
The idea that a neurologist would do an 'FND clinic' or that functional neurological disorder (FND) could be a subspecialty of neurology would have been outlandish even 20 years ago
These quacks sure do love to invent fake origin stories. Conversion disorder was invented by Freud and has been part of neurology since. It wasn't called FND, but that's about the only difference you could find with what fellow quack neurologists from a century were pushing. It's not even hard to find this stuff. They've even been called functional disorders for well over a century, FFS. Might as well pretend that psychosomatic medicine is brand new never-before-seen-or-thought-of. It's maddening how all of this is so obviously wrong that they have to constantly rewrite their own history and pretend that old ideas are brand new.

Sure, this stuff has been popular within psychiatry as well, but they're pretty much saying the same stuff anyway. There is literally nothing outlandish about any of this, this stuff predated this dude's birth and only a few labels have changed, all of which is documented plenty as being motivated with the belief that lying to patients is more effective.

But of course shills for establishment ideologies always pretend to be subversive. It's part of what shills do and how they justify their BS.
 
Back
Top Bottom