1. See the 'News in Brief' from w/c 12th August, by clicking here, Guest.
    Dismiss Notice

Key Concepts for Informed Health Choices: a framework for helping people learn how to assess treatment claims and make informed choices.

Discussion in 'Health News and Research unrelated to ME/CFS' started by Woolie, Jan 28, 2018.

  1. Woolie

    Woolie Committee member

    Messages:
    2,231
    Likes Received:
    13,793
    Key Concepts for Informed Health Choices: a framework for helping people learn how to assess treatment claims and make informed choices.

    Chalmers I, Oxman AD, Austvoll-Dahlgren A, et al. BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine 2018; 23:29–33.

    http://ebm.bmj.com/content/ebmed/23/1/29.full.pdf. (full text is free)

    A list of some of the key concepts:
     
  2. Jonathan Edwards

    Jonathan Edwards Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    4,901
    Likes Received:
    51,366
    It all seems very sensible and plausible. So why is Chalmers associated with the Norwegian centre where courses are run by Larun and Brurberg, who write Cochrane reviews that make all these mistakes?
     
  3. Jonathan Edwards

    Jonathan Edwards Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    4,901
    Likes Received:
    51,366
    MSEsperanza, Woolie, Barry and 2 others like this.
  4. Andy

    Andy Committee Member & Outreach

    Messages:
    7,034
    Likes Received:
    52,243
    Location:
    Hampshire, UK
    MSEsperanza, Woolie, MEMarge and 3 others like this.
  5. strategist

    strategist Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,775
    Likes Received:
    17,701
    Research really needs patient interests to be properly represented, doesn't it.
     
    Sarah94, MSEsperanza, Samuel and 5 others like this.
  6. Esther12

    Esther12 Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,138
    Likes Received:
    26,024
    Glasziou P has been attempting to defend PACE, and is one of the co-authors of the Cochrane protocol for the CFS exercise review.
     
    MSEsperanza, Woolie, MEMarge and 4 others like this.
  7. Jonathan Edwards

    Jonathan Edwards Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    4,901
    Likes Received:
    51,366
    The irony seems palpable:

    'Our survey shows that information on the policies and processes used by research funding agencies to reduce waste and support methodological research and research infrastructure is generally not transparent or readily available. It appears that the processes of governance do not, in general, hold accountable the funding agencies we have surveyed for assessing whether and how they address the questions raised by the reduce research waste framework.'
     
    Last edited: Jan 28, 2018
    Mithriel, MSEsperanza, Trish and 5 others like this.
  8. Jonathan Edwards

    Jonathan Edwards Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    4,901
    Likes Received:
    51,366
    So what is really going on here?

    Is it that Chalmers, like Taverne, has unwittingly spawned a Frankenstein's monster of an organisation that propagates the opposite of what is intended, or is this a group of people who genuinely do not understand that they are prime examples of their own bêtes noirs?

    I am reminded of the chap in Edinburgh (?Macleod) who gave his inaugural lecture on bad science, and of course of Ben Goldacre.

    Is this in fact a new psychiatric disease idiotruncumoptosis (having a beam in one's own eye) potentially resistant to all forms of psychotherapy?
     
    Mithriel, Sarah94, TiredSam and 8 others like this.
  9. Jonathan Edwards

    Jonathan Edwards Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    4,901
    Likes Received:
    51,366
    So the question is: did @Woolie know that one of the authors of this piece was also on a GET Cochrane review supporting the BPS approach? Was that the reason for posting?
     
    MEMarge and Invisible Woman like this.
  10. Barry

    Barry Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    4,597
    Likes Received:
    30,362
    Or is it people wanting to be seen promoting best practice, so their other endeavours will be presumed, by association, conforming to that best practice?
     
  11. Jonathan Edwards

    Jonathan Edwards Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    4,901
    Likes Received:
    51,366
    That would certainly apply to some of the co-authors of the GET review, but where does Chalmers stand? As far as I know he has o'other endeavours' beyond furthering best practice.
     
    Barry, BurnA, Valentijn and 1 other person like this.
  12. Woolie

    Woolie Committee member

    Messages:
    2,231
    Likes Received:
    13,793
    I smelt hypocrisy right away. Especially give that it was recommended on twitter by some of the worst offenders. What they say seems reasonable - even useful to put it all together - but we know some of these authors do not follow their own advice.
     
  13. strategist

    strategist Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,775
    Likes Received:
    17,701
    Mimicry is a survival strategy employed by many animals. It seems that humans may employ what could be called virtue mimicry (giving the impression of embracing certain virtues, when in reality doing no such thing). Or maybe I'm just overthinking this and reinventing hypocrisy... but a case could be made for this being a deliberate strategy.

    Richard Horton also came across as big on hypocrisy. I'm guessing it helps to be seen on twitter showing compassion with poor African children while helping PACE authors exploit hundred thousands of patients with pseudoscience.
     
    Last edited: Jan 29, 2018
    MSEsperanza, Sarah94, Trish and 7 others like this.
  14. Barry

    Barry Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    4,597
    Likes Received:
    30,362
    No, I don't feel you are overthinking this at all, you are spot on. It's part of the hiding in plain sight strategy some people do - whether they do it consciously, or is just second nature, is another matter. But I think it is more than hypocrisy, because there is an objective behind it.
     
  15. MSEsperanza

    MSEsperanza Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    804
    Likes Received:
    5,636
    Location:
    betwixt and between


    Code:
    https://twitter.com/EricTopol/status/1161003716448624640

    (Not sure whether this deserves its own thread.)

    Edit:
    Maynard, Matt/ Oxman, Andrew/ Pullin, Nicola et al (2019), Key concepts for making informed choices, Nature, vol 572 (15 Aug 2019),
    https://www.nature.com/magazine-assets/d41586-019-02407-9/d41586-019-02407-9.pdf


    Andrew Oxman is mentioned as an advisor in the e-mail exchange on the Cochrane review between Atle Fretheim and David Tovey
    see https://www.s4me.info/threads/cochr...developments-2018-19.10030/page-4#post-179971
     
    Last edited: Aug 13, 2019
    rvallee and Andy like this.
  16. rvallee

    rvallee Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,097
    Likes Received:
    16,840
    Location:
    Canada
    A quick look at this list suggests every single thing produced as part of the psychosocial model of ME fails on every single point. PACE particularly excels, along with others in the series of bad acronym trials. Literally. Every. Single. Point. It's even missing several things that those trials did because they are so evidently fraudulent that it's expected no one would actually try them. And yet here we are.

    Somehow I guess this will be exempted. Somehow.

    I will still put forward that I would very much this framework to apply to all research on ME. One day, when we are taken off the blacklist anyway.
     

Share This Page