1. Less than a week to support David Tuller's work. To donate click here.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Guest, the 'News in Brief' for the week beginning 12th October 2020 is here.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Welcome! To read the Core Purpose and Values of our forum, click here.
    Dismiss Notice

Junk science publisher ordered to stop ‘deceptive practices’

Discussion in 'Health News and Research unrelated to ME/CFS' started by Guest 3, Nov 24, 2017.

  1. Guest 3

    Guest 3 Guest

    Read the rest of the article here.
     
  2. Valentijn

    Valentijn Not a moderator

    Messages:
    2,275
    Likes Received:
    13,297
    Location:
    Netherlands
    Interesting that it isn't about the quality, review process, etc, but rather about deceptive practices in getting researchers to submit articles:
    Their defense is "fake news" :cautious:
     
  3. Alvin

    Alvin Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,309
    Likes Received:
    16,117
    Indeed, they learn from the best (or should i say worst) :emoji_face_palm:
     
    Little Bluestem, barbc, zzz and 2 others like this.
  4. Woolie

    Woolie Committee member

    Messages:
    2,478
    Likes Received:
    15,954
    Apparently, lots of these predatory journals have clever tricks to make them look "legit". For example, including superfluous citations of their own journals' article - to make the impact factor (journal citation rates) look bigger.
     
  5. Jonathan Edwards

    Jonathan Edwards Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    7,569
    Likes Received:
    77,730
    As far as I can see this is a bit of humbug. All this started with the mainstream journals doing much the same. I remember being hit for unexpected page charges by the premier rheumatology journal twenty years ago. There are no good guys in this business. The academic community only has itself to blame.
     
  6. Esther12

    Esther12 Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,763
    Likes Received:
    30,722
    Someone else pointed out a few years ago that a lot of articles in the Journal of Psychosomatic Research seemed to have superfluous references of work by the journal's editor.
     

Share This Page