Junk science publisher ordered to stop ‘deceptive practices’

Discussion in 'Research methodology news and research' started by Guest 3, Nov 24, 2017.

  1. Guest 3

    Guest 3 Guest

    Read the rest of the article here.
     
  2. Valentijn

    Valentijn Guest

    Messages:
    2,275
    Location:
    Netherlands
    Interesting that it isn't about the quality, review process, etc, but rather about deceptive practices in getting researchers to submit articles:
    Their defense is "fake news" :cautious:
     
  3. Alvin

    Alvin Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,309
    Indeed, they learn from the best (or should i say worst) :emoji_face_palm:
     
    Little Bluestem, barbc, zzz and 2 others like this.
  4. Woolie

    Woolie Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,918
    Apparently, lots of these predatory journals have clever tricks to make them look "legit". For example, including superfluous citations of their own journals' article - to make the impact factor (journal citation rates) look bigger.
     
  5. Jonathan Edwards

    Jonathan Edwards Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    13,938
    Location:
    London, UK
    As far as I can see this is a bit of humbug. All this started with the mainstream journals doing much the same. I remember being hit for unexpected page charges by the premier rheumatology journal twenty years ago. There are no good guys in this business. The academic community only has itself to blame.
     
  6. Esther12

    Esther12 Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    4,393
    Someone else pointed out a few years ago that a lot of articles in the Journal of Psychosomatic Research seemed to have superfluous references of work by the journal's editor.
     

Share This Page