Impact of post-COVID-19 condition on health status and activities of daily living: the PRIME post-COVID study, 2024, Herck et al.

Discussion in 'Long Covid research' started by SNT Gatchaman, Mar 20, 2024.

  1. SNT Gatchaman

    SNT Gatchaman Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    4,515
    Location:
    Aotearoa New Zealand
    Impact of post-COVID-19 condition on health status and activities of daily living: the PRIME post-COVID study
    Maarten Van Herck; Demi M E Pagen; Céline J A van Bilsen; Stephanie Brinkhues; Kevin Konings; Casper D J den Heijer; Suhreta Mujakovic; Henriëtte L G ter Waarbeek; Chris Burtin; Daisy J A Janssen; Christian J P A Hoebe; Martijn A Spruit; Nicole H T M Dukers-Muijrers

    OBJECTIVES
    To assess health and activities of daily living (ADL) in SARS-CoV-2-positive adults with and without post-COVID-19 condition (PCC) and compare this with negative tested individuals. Furthermore, different PCC case definitions were compared with SARS-CoV-2-negative individuals.

    METHODS
    All adults tested PCR positive for SARS-CoV-2 at the Public Health Service South Limburg (Netherlands) between June 2020 and November 2021 (n=41 780) and matched PCR negative individuals (2:1, on age, sex, year-quarter test, municipality; n=19 875) were invited by email. Health (five-level EuroQol five-dimension (EQ5D) index and EuroQol visual analogue scale (EQVAS)) and ADL impairment were assessed. PCC classification was done using the WHO case definition and five other common definitions.

    RESULTS
    In total, 8409 individuals (6381 SARS-CoV-2 positive; 53±15 years; 57% female; 9 (7–11) months since test) were included. 39.4% of positives had PCC by the WHO case definition (EQVAS: 71±20; EQ5D index: 0.800±0.191; ADL impairment: 30 (10–70)%) and perceived worse health and more ADL impairment than negatives, that is, difference of −8.50 points (95% CI −9.71 to −7.29; p<0.001) for EQVAS, which decreased by 1.49 points (95% CI 0.86 to 2.12; p<0.001) in individuals with PCC for each comorbidity present, and differences of −0.065 points (95% CI −0.074 to −0.056; p<0.001) for EQ5D index, and +16.72% (95% CI 15.01 to 18.43; p<0.001) for ADL impairment. Health and ADL impairment were similar in negatives and positives without PCC. Replacing the WHO case definition with other PCC definitions yielded comparable results.

    CONCLUSIONS
    Individuals with PCC have substantially worse health and more ADL impairment than negative controls, irrespective of the case definition. Authorities should inform the public about the associated burden of PCC and enable adequate support.


    Link | PDF (Thorax)
     
    Starlight, EndME, Amw66 and 3 others like this.

Share This Page