Umm, medical science? Science, this lot?An utterly appalling question.
WTF has gone wrong with medical science in the UK?
Umm, medical science? Science, this lot?An utterly appalling question.
WTF has gone wrong with medical science in the UK?
@Action for M.E. - please address the 2 year recovery period in your info for GPs, including advising those who have watched - there is so little evidence of this it is both unprofessional and harmfulWe have this data for adults from English clinics at five year follow-up. It suggests non-recovery is very common. My guess is the recovery rate is probably lower than what newly diagnosed people expect rather than higher i.e. many patients should probably be warned to be less optimistic.
Specialist treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome/ME: a cohort study among adult patients in England
https://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12913-017-2437-3
- Simon M Collin
- Esther Crawley
Do you think that you are still suffering from CFS/ME?
Yes 82.7% (81/98)
No 8.2% (8/98)
Uncertain 9.2% (9/98)
Why? How? Based on what?Attributing CFS to a viral cause may be advantageous because the explanation is easy to understand and to explain to others, and it may also be self-protective as it precludes guilt, blame or social stigma that may be associated with alternative explanations. However, the problem of attributing CFS to a viral cause is that it may result in feeling helpless around self-efficacy for recovery [8].
Attributing CFS to a viral cause may be advantageous because the explanation is easy to understand and to explain to others, and it may also be self-protective as it precludes guilt, blame or social stigma that may be associated with alternative explanations. However, the problem of attributing CFS to a viral cause is that it may result in feeling helpless around self-efficacy for recovery [8].
Attributing CFS to a viral cause may be advantageous because the explanation is easy to understand and to explain to others, and it may also be self-protective as it precludes guilt, blame or social stigma that may be associated with alternative explanations.
That looks familiar: "Blaming symptoms on a viral infection conveys certain advantages, irrespective of its validity. It is simple, frequent and easily accepted. ... It is also beneficial to self-esteem by protecting the individual from guilt and blame." - Wessely (1991) [link to more complete quote in another thread here]
Chalder et al regurgitating Wessely what a surpriseThat looks familiar: "Blaming symptoms on a viral infection conveys certain advantages, irrespective of its validity. It is simple, frequent and easily accepted. ... It is also beneficial to self-esteem by protecting the individual from guilt and blame." - Wessely (1991) [link to more complete quote in another thread here]
Yep. Situation needs that level of response. Start with an immediate suspension of psycho-behavioural treatments of the sort used by PACE and similar trials, especially exercise treatments. Then straight onto the high level, independent, and very public investigations into exactly WTF happened, and why, and how do we make sure its like doesn't happen again.I would trust a Medium before many of the claimed experts in the NHS, and I don't even believe in psychic advice. Its getting to be more of an issue here in Australia too. The damage being done is so severe, globally, that I believe certain careers should be stopped ... no more research or giving advice for ME permitted.
Chalder et al regurgitating Wessely what a surprise
Eugh even worseIn a sense she is regurgitating herself, as she was one of the "et als", along with Butler and David.
bump - still to have a response to this@Action for M.E. - please address the 2 year recovery period in your info for GPs, including advising those who have watched - there is so little evidence of this it is both unprofessional and harmful
In a sense she is regurgitating herself, as she was one of the "et als", along with Butler and David.