Art Vandelay
Senior Member (Voting Rights)
Immunity to falsification must high up the list of cardinal features of mind-body theories.
Spot on.
This shouldn't be ME-specific. Just to the general concept of chronic illnesses being caused by the mind-body connection.
He doesn't believe they are completely caused by the mind. He just believes that the mind can sometimes be part of it. So, he's not too far gone to convince!
[Apologies in advance if this doesn't make sense. I have terrible cognitive issues which affect my ability to think, read and argue coherently. I'm sure someone smarter than me can correct me if I've made any mistakes.]
My view is that the onus isn't on you to disprove the mind-body (ie, psychosomatic causation) hypothesis of chronic illness. It's up to him (and its proponents) to prove it in the first place. The burden of proof should be on those putting forward the hypothesis.
Where is the definitive scientific proof for the hypothesis of psychosomatic causation of illness? There certainly wasn't any scientific evidence offered by those espousing mind-body causes of asthma, autism, epilepsy, ulcers, AIDS etc. Apparently you can make such claims without the need for scientific evidence in many parts of medicine.
There's no evidence to support the hypothesis of psychosomatic illness because it is an untestable and unfalsifiable hypothesis. For this reason, I would argue that psychosomatic medicine is pseudoscience.
Last edited: