Preprint Hypothesis: A Mechanical Basis: Brainstem Dysfunction as a Potential Etiology of ME/CFS and Long COVID, 2025, Jeff Wood, Kaufman et al.

John Mac

Senior Member (Voting Rights)

Abstract​

The underlying pathologies driving post-acute infectious syndromes (e.g. myalgic encephalomyelitis / chronic fatigue syndrome, long COVID, etc) remain poorly understood. Given the extreme burden these illnesses impose on suffers, and the dramatic increase in cases following the COVID-19 pandemic, it is important to establish a deeper understanding of these pathologies. We propose a model of how ME/CFS (and related illnesses), might emerge following a viral insult. Central to this hypothesis is the recognition that the core diagnostic features of ME/CFS involve bodily systems known to be governed by the brainstem. This is consistent with the growing literature suggesting that spinal and craniocervical pathologies are over-represented in people with ME/CFS and other post-infectious disorders.

We hypothesize that a non-trivial number of cases of ME/CFS and Long Covid (LC) may have a ``mechanical basis." We propose that an infectious insult may trigger an initial loss of connective tissue integrity in susceptible individuals (e.g. those with pre-existing hypermobility spectrum disorders), which in turn leads to instability at the craniocervical junction, and ultimately mechanical deformation of the brainstem. This ultimately causes widespread autonomic nervous system and immune system dysfunction due to aberrant signaling from the deformed nuclei. This causal chain may also lead to a vicious cycle: if the dysregulation produced by the initial brainstem deformation leads to a deranged immune response or state of chronic hyper-inflammation, further expression of connective tissue degrading and remodeling factors such as MMPs and mast cells may be triggered. This could further degrade the connective tissues of the craniocervical junction and, in turn, increase mechanical deformation of the brainstem, leading to symptom exacerbation over time and leading to the chronic, lifelong presentation typical of ME/CFS.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Last edited:
Note also that Jeff Wood works as a self employed 'consultant' on this stuff, including, from memory from past discussions, directing patients to spinal surgeons. So he has a major financial conflict of interest and I can't see that declared anywhere on the article.
 
It’s a non-profit started by some pwME. They fund a couple microbiome-related projects, and they had a regular zoom meeting to discuss research. Not sure if they’re still doing those meetings, I was invited to join and attending a few but did not continue.

[Edit: it’s very focused on gut-brain axis]
I got the impression they didn’t have the best methodological rigor. I also always confuse them with Renegade Research so it’s very confusing to me.

i remember thinking Renegade research had a really cool mission/structure but being pretty dubious of the claims they were making.

I think Remission Biome is a project of Renegade Research?
 
I also always confuse them with Renegade Research so it’s very confusing to me.

Oh they're not the same? You learn something new every day.

I'm embarrassed to admit that they were one of the first "researchers" I learnt about when I first got ill. In comparison, it took me about 3 months to find this forum... Says a lot about how the quacks pursue their marketing.
 
I got the impression they didn’t have the best methodological rigor. I also always confuse them with Renegade Research so it’s very confusing to me.

i remember thinking Renegade research had a really cool mission/structure but being pretty dubious of the claims they were making.

I think Remission Biome is a project of Renegade Research?
It is part of Renegade Research, and yes, I'd agree with your assessment there. I was never even exposed to their whole protocol thing, just two of their research discussions which were free to join. Suffice it to say I'll stick to S4ME.

I believe that it was confirmed that commission was received on purchases of the recommended supplements in the 'protocol' from the recommended suppliers.
Wow I didn't know that was confirmed. I did know that their "protocol" costs in the thousands, though.
 
Last edited:
I think Remission Biome is a project of Renegade Research?
I think they were but there was a parting of the ways at some point, I can't remember the reason why.

Wow I didn't know that was confirmed. I did know that their "protocol" costs in the thousands, though.
Yeah, I would have had a problem with it for that reason even if they weren't getting commission.
 
It is part of Renegade Research, and yes, I'd agree with your assessment there. I was never even exposed to their whole protocol thing, just two of their research "discussions" which were free to join. Suffice it to say I'll stick to S4ME.


Wow I didn't know that was confirmed. I did know that their "protocol" costs in the thousands, though.
Their webpage says it’s $4,300-6,000 on average. And they say that 25 % of their funding has gone to «organisation», whatever that means. Their finance page is a bit of a mess in terms of what goes where.
 

This is consistent with the growing literature suggesting that spinal and craniocervical pathologies are over-represented in people with ME/CFS and other post-infectious disorders.
Where might I find that growing literature? There certainly are CCI cases that mimic ME/CFS, and it might be productive to look into it as to why. But extrapolating it to the cause of ME/CFS will be fruitless because, well, not too many ME/CFS patients have craniocervical pathologies.

My guess would be that the craniocervical pathology "pinches" the neuroimmunology of the brain turning it hypersensitive. The hypersensitivity then resolves when the pinching is removed. In ME/CFS on the hand, the brain turns hypersensitive by the triggering event without the ongoing pinching.
 
Where might I find that growing literature? There certainly are CCI cases that mimic ME/CFS, and it might be productive to look into it as to why.

There was a paper by the Bragee group that he brought here but the case selection looked suspect and there weren't any CCI cases as far as I know.

I have not seen any evidence of CCI cases mimicking ME/CFS. The only MRI scans I have seen look normal. Until we see an actual CCI image I doubt there is anything to look into.

CCI was part of my stock in trade as an RA physician. The clinical picture is nothing like ME/CFS.
 
The full author list:

Jeffrey D. Wood 1,*, Thomas F. Varley 1,2,*, Jacob Hartman 1, Nick Melia 1, David L. Kaufman 3and Tess Falor 1

1 Renegade Research, Denver, CO
2 Vermont Complex Systems Institute, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT
3 The Center for Complex Diseases, Mountain View, CA*
Correspondence: jeff@mechanicalbasis.org (J.D.W.); tfvarley@uvm.edu (T.F.V.)

Note that Jeff Wood and Tess Falor are both listed as Renegade Research.
 
The full author list:

Jeffrey D. Wood 1,*, Thomas F. Varley 1,2,*, Jacob Hartman 1, Nick Melia 1, David L. Kaufman 3and Tess Falor 1

1 Renegade Research, Denver, CO
2 Vermont Complex Systems Institute, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT
3 The Center for Complex Diseases, Mountain View, CA*
Correspondence: jeff@mechanicalbasis.org (J.D.W.); tfvarley@uvm.edu (T.F.V.)

Note that Jeff Wood and Tess Falor are both listed as Renegade Research.
thank you, I thought I recognized a few more of those names from the remission biome website. [Edit: Kaufman is a physician who does zoom sessions with them frequently, it looks like]

I kept digging, and remission biome is listed as the only active project for renegade research on their website. If they did have a schism as @Andy said it seems they’ve repaired it.

So this appears to be some kind of refinement of the vague gestures towards “neuro-inflammation” from earlier remission biome hypothesizing, driven by Wood’s own CCI theories.
 
Back
Top Bottom