Thanks for all the thoughtful replies.
My experiences in the last few days have reminded me once again how fragile our balance of activity is once again. My last few days have been wasted because someone entered my back yard and smashed the window of my car. I wondered why they didn't actually rummage though my car (the hole in the window was not large enough to open the door). With much thought, I guess because my car is over 20 years old, they were trying their luck in stealing it, only to give up when setting off the alarm. Unfortunately, I've spent the last few days trying to track down a window, there are none locally and I've had to order one from interstate, with a week of anxiety due to the missing window and hoping the replacement doesn't arrive damaged.
Back on topic though, there were a few notable points mentioned by more than a few people. One was about the nature of motivation, effort and achievement. I can't say I was raised with a 'protestant work ethic' or similar. My parents are both extremely intelligent, but they're also quite laid back. (I actually wished they'd be more interested in supporting me in extracurricular activities between the ages of around 10-15, before my healthy life was cut short, but I digress...)
But it is also not that we (I was the youngest of four siblings) were not expected to achieve, but simply by working as hard as everyone else, we can achieve more than others, simply by virtue of greater intelligence and self awareness. So I was following the 80/20 rule, long before I became ill.
As arrogant as that sounds, that was my experience at school, getting mostly A grades while coasting and making money with internet ventures in the late 90s. Of course my lack of diligence (and unexpected windfall) meant that I didn't file a tax form with the US government, leading to thousands of dollars being withheld (that I never got back!). But then I became ill and everything turned to shit, I started to realise how hard it can be for others to concentrate and do school work!
That was over 20 years ago. I have never had a job that has lasted for more than a week. As such, my drive to do something meaningful isn't necessarily out of some desire to "achieve", but I feel like I've missed out on what most people regard as a life. I've been choosing 'lesser' tasks for years, basically what I feel like doing on the day, but I'm feeling increasingly unsatisfied with that approach.
What's most important to you, doing research yourself because you love doing research, or seeing your ideas tested even if it has to be done by somebody else?
Are there any compromise solutions like pitching your ideas to established researchers, i.e. your idea, their donkey work, both names on the paper? It's about time they took patient involvement to the next level.
In a sense, both. My experience of pitching ideas has been poor. There are basically two responses: being ignored, and researchers that have their curiosity piqued, but I suspect they don't have the knowledge or time to dig in, which is why they usually reply with encouragement as if is something I should be pursuing, rather than them.
I'm also not interested in writing purely hypothesis based papers, I want to see experimental research done and I want it do be done properly, which means an advisory role on a team at the very least. My motivation also stems from frustration that no one is building on what so far is the only firm foothold that has been found so far in ME/CFS research. It is building on those footholds that will end the funding catch-22 so I don't understand why no one is on board, especially the researchers who have conducted the preliminary research. I simply can't deal with the prospect of another 20 years of more of the same.