1. Sign our petition calling on Cochrane to withdraw their review of Exercise Therapy for CFS here.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Guest, the 'News in Brief' for the week beginning 15th April 2024 is here.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Welcome! To read the Core Purpose and Values of our forum, click here.
    Dismiss Notice

Ginger-indirect moxibustion plus acupuncture versus acupuncture alone for chronic fatigue syndrome:a randomized controlled trial, 2022, Tingting et al

Discussion in 'ME/CFS research' started by Andy, Apr 28, 2022.

Tags:
  1. Andy

    Andy Committee Member

    Messages:
    21,944
    Location:
    Hampshire, UK
    Abstract

    Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of ginger-indirect moxibustion for chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS).

    Methods: In this central randomized, controlled trial, 290 CFS participants were recruited and randomly allocated to group A (ginger-indirect moxibustion plus acupuncture) or group B (acupuncture alone). The study consisted of a treatment period of 8 weeks with a total of 24 treatments (3 sessions per week, every other day), and a follow-up period of 12 weeks. The outcome was measured by Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), Psychological Health Report (SPHERE), the Self-rating depression scale (SDS) and the Hamilton anxiety scale (HAMA) at baseline, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 20 weeks.

    Results: With the treatment undergoing, the changes of FSS, SPHERE, SDS and HAMA scores in both groups increased gradually, and the effect maintained at the 12th week. Between groups, significantly higher score changes were seen in group A in FSS after 4 weeks treatment (11.94 9.12, 95%: 0.94, 4.7) and in SPHERE after 2 weeks treatment (3.7 2.27, 95%: 0.56, 2.31). But for SDS and HAMA, the improvement did not differ significantly between groups. No severe adverse events were reported.

    Conclusion: Ginger-indirect moxibustion is a safe and effective intervention to relieve fatigue and accompanying physical symptoms of CFS.

    Abstract from PubMed listing, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35473345/
    Link to paper, https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?doi=10.19852/j.cnki.jtcm.20211214.003
     
    Peter Trewhitt, Hutan and Trish like this.
  2. Trish

    Trish Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    52,285
    Location:
    UK
    So some random between group fluctuations between groups on questionnaires, but no overall between group difference. And not enough data in the abstract to show whether the overall changes were clinically significant. And no control group.
    What a waste of effort.
     
  3. rvallee

    rvallee Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    12,453
    Location:
    Canada
    I really do hope to see more pseudoscience adopting the BPS formula. It works, you can report whatever you want with it, as long as the conclusions are vague enough to be interpreted whatever way one feels like.
     
  4. Hutan

    Hutan Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    26,907
    Location:
    Aotearoa New Zealand
    Not a waste of effort as far as ginger-indirect moxibustion practitioners are concerned.
     
    Mithriel, Peter Trewhitt and Trish like this.
  5. Trish

    Trish Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    52,285
    Location:
    UK
    :laugh:
    I'd rather eat the ginger.
     

Share This Page