Genetics: HFE

Hutan

Moderator
Staff member
DecodeME candidate ME gene
From the Candidate Genes document

In DecodeME, we attempted to link GWAS variants to target genes. Here we discuss the top two tiers of predicted linked genes that we are most confident about –‘Tier 1’ and ’Tier 2’.

We defined genes as Tier 1 genes if: (i) they are protein-coding genes, (ii) they have GTEx-v10 expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) lying within one of the FUMA-defined ME/CFS-associated intervals, and (iii) their expression and ME/CFS risk are predicted to share a single causal variant with a posterior probability for colocalisation (H4) of at least 75%. For this definition, we disregarded the histone genes in the chr6p22.2 HIST1 cluster, as their sequences and functions are highly redundant (1). This prioritisation step yielded 29 Tier 1 genes.

For the intervals without Tier 1 genes, three Tier 2 genes were defined as the closest protein-coding genes without eQTL association: FBXL4 (chr6q16.1), OLFM4 (chr13q14.3), and CCPG1 (chr15q21.3).
CHROMOSOME 6p
Chr6p contained seven Tier 1 genes.

********************
HFE (Tier 1)

• Protein: Homeostatic iron regulator protein. UniProt. GeneCards.
The allele that increases the risk of ME/CFS is associated with increasing HFE gene expression in the cortex and prostate.

• Molecular function: HFE protein regulates the interaction of the transferrin receptor with transferrin.

• Cellular function: HFE protein influences iron absorption by modulating the expression of hepcidin, the main controller of iron metabolism.

• Link to disease: Mutations in HFE can lead to hereditary haemochromatosis, an excessive absorption and accumulation of iron (41).

• Potential relevance to ME/CFS: Unclear.

********************

References
41 Barton JC, Edwards CQ, Acton RT. HFE gene: Structure, function, mutations, and associated iron abnormalities. Gene. 2015 Dec 15;574(2):179–92.
 
This one got me a bit excited, as there are a number of references to iron issues and diagnoses related to iron control related to ME/CFS on the forum - papers and member experiences. And, we know that infections can result in a change in iron homeostasis. It seemed to me to be a mechanism that is worth considering as the perturbation that might help tip a body into ME/CFS.

I've tagged some of the possibly relevant threads with 'iron'.

Here's a couple:
Members Only - Could iron load impact ME?

 
More from the Iron dysregulation study. The 'Hanson' is not Maureen Hanson.
Getting back to the Hanson article, this is interesting:

Speculatively, the generally increased prevalence of iron deficiency in pre-menopausal women may contribute to the higher risk of PASC amongst this demographic7,9,10by enhancing the relative magnitude of infection-related iron redistribution against a baseline of lower iron stores.​
....​
It is unlikely that these observations are SARS-CoV-2 specific. Disruption of host iron homeostasis is a consequence of many viral infections, both through direct viral mechanisms of interference and as a consequence of the evoked inflammatory response50,84. Many infectious diseases—including Ebola85,86, influenza87 and SARS88—elicit broadly similar post-acute sequelae, suggesting similar iron-redistribution strategies may be considered. This study has implicated disrupted iron homeostasis and iron-deprived stress erythropoiesis that persisted for more than 2 weeks from symptom onset as potential drivers of PASC.​

I would like to go back in time, please. With an iron infusion.

Just a note on interpretation of the results for this study, since I explored this data in-depth as part of a validation for another LC study I was a part of.

Ferritin is a carrying molecule that is primarily present within cells in the body. Transferrin is the primary molecule that carries iron in the bloodstream (hemoglobin notwithstanding).

Some amount of ferritin leaks out of cells and is present in the blood plasma--because of this, free blood ferritin levels may often be used as a proxy for available iron stores in the body. The logic being that more ferritin in the blood = there's enough iron stored in ferritin in the cells to go around.

However, if there are differences in how greedily cells are holding onto that iron, levels of ferritin in the blood may not correlate that well to the actual presence of iron in the body.

The theoretical explanation based on these results is that there is an increased sequestration of iron in certain innate immune cells starting during infection and it continues beyond infection in individuals who experience LC. In simple terms, the rest of the body experiences "anemia" because certain innate immune cells are really active thieves.

This "iron theft" is often seen during acute infection and is induced as a response to certain cytokines. The main question in LC is why these cells don't return to normal behavior after infection is cleared. That question is somewhat beyond the scope of this paper.

Because they are still "thieving" iron, further iron supplementation may or may not help. It is hard to tell how much of that supplemented iron will actually end up where it is supposed to go vs. getting rounded up by those same greedy immune cells.

It's also hard to determine which LC symptoms are coming from the direct behavior of those immune cells vs. less iron availability for other cells. So even if you are able to get more iron to the rest of the body, that may only fix a portion of the problem.
 
I think iron metabolism per se would be hard to link to ME/CFS. However, transferrin receptor expression has been known as a marker of immune cell activation for some time and the AI summary on Google notes that transferrin receptor defects can produce immunodeficiency syndromes. So the molecule may be rather crucial for lymphocytes and maybe macrophages/microglia.

My guesses at relevance to ME/CFS would be:
1. Transferrin receptor usage by microglia might be relevant to neuron/microglia signalling in e.g. hypothalamus.
2. Transferrin receptor might be involved in innate immune signalling in response to 'daily junk' in the sort of context Jo, Jackie and I raised on Qeios.

One thought related to this is that processes like autophagy, immune cell priming with increased cytoplasmic size and shifts in respiration and mitochondrial content that occur in a peripheral immune response may be recapitulated within microglia and genetic shifts might affect both in such a way that the brain's microcosmal modelling of the body state might be subverted.
 
Can you elaborate on what this means?

Not much, just that the brain's job is to model the world in one way or another and for microglia that might actually make use of some of the same signals that ae being modelled. Blocking cyclo-oxygenase in joints with ibuprofen helps flu myalgia but blocking cyclo-oxygenase in the brain also helps the fever. I am trying to think of a way to tie these things together that might lead to a light-bulb moment but I am not sure I have quite got there yet.
 
Not much, just that the brain's job is to model the world in one way or another and for microglia that might actually make use of some of the same signals that ae being modelled. Blocking cyclo-oxygenase in joints with ibuprofen helps flu myalgia but blocking cyclo-oxygenase in the brain also helps the fever. I am trying to think of a way to tie these things together that might lead to a light-bulb moment but I am not sure I have quite got there yet.
It’s been evolutionarily beneficial across the body to repurpose the same pathways for a new function in a different context so long as the functions in different contexts don’t negatively interfere with eachother too much. We see that with the NOTCH pathway being involved in nearly everything, with metabolic pathways mediating nearly all immune effector functions, etc.

No “job fulfillment” needed to explain, though it is funny to think about the brain receiving a quarterly project assignment and self assessment questionnaire from evolution.
 
I have five measures of transferrin, all are below the normal range. Transferrin saturation has bounced around but has sometimes been high normal.

As I mentioned elsewhere, my son was found to have iron deficiency as part of the investigations after ME/CFS onset, and had to have iron tablets, despite having a normal non-vegetarian diet.
 
Seeing HFE pop up is intriguing. I’ve long wondered if my haemochromatosis and my ME are mutually reinforcing each other in some unhelpful way (beyond the fact that haemochromatosis treatment plus having to travel for it is a sure-fire way of ending up with PEM)

Clearly, simple iron levels by themselves can’t be a significant causative factor in ME. Most people with iron deficiency don’t have ME and neither do most people with iron overload

Though there might be an issue with misdiagnosis, especially for meat-eating males. It seems iron testing is anything but routine if you’re not part of a group considered at risk from anaemia, even if you present with fatigue. If that’s a big enough problem to skew research results I don’t know, maybe not, though it’s certainly a problem for the affected patients who’re missing out on effective treatment but that’s another story

More interesting, maybe, would be to consider the impact of the wrong amount of iron in the wrong place at the wrong time. This could conceivably cause some other cells to misbehave in some way

In this context it’s intriguing that, anecdotally, on the one hand we have pwME reporting low iron and unexpected difficulties with raising it and on the other hand pwME with iron overload and unexpected difficulties with lowering it. Do these seemingly opposite groups actually have something in common, maybe with respect to the way their bodies lock up iron? And can this tell us something about which cells might be misbehaving in what way as a result of something skewed in their iron supply?
 
Idly googling around for links between HFE and immunity and this review came up. Can’t say I understand much of it so obviously unable to judge the quality but it does seem clear that HFE’s role is very much not limited to iron homeostasis

The hemochromatosis protein HFE 20 years later: An emerging role in antigen presentation and in the immune system” (2017)
The findings of all these studies present a strong and undeniable link between the immunity involving CD8+ T lymphocytes and HH with associated iron overload.

A potential immunological function for HFE has been further implicated with the discovery of HFE and its striking homology with MHC I (Fig. 4A and B). Studies have demonstrated that mutated HFE has a direct impact on MHC I molecules and is associated with abnormal MHC I assembly and expression (Fig. 4C).

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from HH patients carrying the HFEC282Y mutation were reported to have lower levels of MHC I expression due to an increased rate of MHC I endocytosis. This rapid turnover is caused by accelerated antigenic loading and premature MHC/peptide dissociation that coincides with greater expression of β2-m-unbound MHC I heavy chains at the cell surface 63.

Further study revealed that misfolded HFEC282Y protein triggers the unfolded protein response (UPR), a mechanism that impacts intracellular trafficking, and gives rise to MHC I anomalies in HFEC282Y cells 99, including reduced cell surface expression. Importantly, despite its inability to present peptides, HFE can be recognized by a TCRαβ of mouse CD8+ T cells, particularly those expressing the variable AV6.1 and AV6.6 gene segments 65, further reinforcing a functional link between HFE and antigen presentation by MHC I.

These reports have prompted investigations into the role of HFE on CD8+ T lymphocyte activation. One study evaluated how the presence of wild-type and mutated HFE molecules affected the ability of MHC I molecules, specifically HLA-A2, to present selected antigens and subsequently activate CD8+ T lymphocytes 62.

Wild-type HFE, but not HFEC282Y, inhibited the secretion of T cell cytokines and the expression of lymphocyte activation markers, demonstrating the functional impact of HFE on CD8+ T lymphocytes. The inhibition of CD8+ T lymphocyte activation involved the α1–2 domains of wild-type HFE and was independent of MHC I expression level, β2-m competition, HFE-TfR1 interaction, or epitope origin and affinity 62.

Considering its ubiquitous expression, these data suggest a new role for wild-type HFE in altering CD8+ T lymphocyte reactivity, which could modulate antigen immunogenicity.​
A quick search for more recent papers on HFE + immunity didn’t come up with much, but this super-technical paper may be of interest as a starting point if anyone wants to look further (I don’t have the capacity myself)

Iron overload in HFE-related hemochromatosis severely impairs Vδ2+ γδ T-cell homeostasis” (2025)
Abstract

HFE-related hemochromatosis induces systemic iron overload. Although extensive studies indicate a pivotal role for iron homeostasis in αβ T-cell immunity, its effect on γδ T cells is unknown.​

Here, we found a reversal of the Vδ2+/Vδ2– ratio in the γδ T-cell compartment as a feature of hemochromatosis, which is associated with a Vδ2+ population that cannot be enriched by zoledronic acid (ZOL) stimulation, despite evidence of T-cell receptor (TCR)–ligand formation and strong proliferative behavior.

In vivo, reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and exhaustion marker expression are significantly increased on Vδ2+ T cells in hemochromatosis compared with healthy individuals.

Ex vivo, hemochromatosis donor–derived Vδ2+ cells are hyporesponsive to TCR stimulation in terms of ROS production but significantly increase their paramount expression of exhaustion markers. Fas-Fas ligand coexpression indicates their high susceptibility to activation-induced cell death.​

Consistent therewith, FeSO4 alone induces Vδ2+ subset-specific proliferation in healthy peripheral blood mononuclear cells comparable to stimulation by ZOL, and blocking experiments identify FeSO4-induced proliferation as BTN3A1/TCR mediated.

Pyrophosphate is key for Vδ2+-TCR ligand formation. Iron, by suppressing pyrophosphatase alkaline phosphatase, promotes their stability. Therefore, our data suggest that the transcriptional repression of pyrophosphatases, as under the conditions of iron overload in hemochromatosis in vivo, leads to the constitutive availability of stress-signaling Vδ2+-TCR ligand and permanent TCR triggering in Vδ2+ T cells even under homeostatic conditions, which ultimately results in their subset-specific, activation-induced cell death.

A similar phenotype was observed in patients with iron overload due to inborn hemoglobinopathies, suggesting an inverted Vδ2+/Vδ2– ratio in the γδ T-cell compartment as a hallmark of iron overload.​
 
Last edited:
I’ve been doing a few cursory dips into HFE – and then lost all my open tabs, argh! So the following is based on a few saved notes and my unreliable memory, minus any sources (in other words, don’t trust anything I write here)

Of course HFE may very well be just an accidental bystander in ME but if it’s not then...
  • based on the DecodeMe results HFE expression would be expected to be upregulated in pwME with the relevant snp (if I haven’t misunderstood, see table S5 Gene Tier 1)
  • this would be kind of opposite to the haemochromatosis mutation which is a loss of function one
  • HFE upregulated > intracellular iron deficiency (this may help explain the refractory iron deficiency some pwME report?)
  • compare loss of function HFE in haemochromatosis > iron overload (could haemochromatosis actually be protective against even more severe ME?)
The damaged HFE protein is well studied in haemochromatosis, there’s much less about HFE’s normal, healthy functions beyond iron regulation e.g. in immunity, and there’s almost nothing on the possible effects of overexpression which is what interests us here (I think)

Also:
  • upregulated HFE > increase in CD4+
  • compare loss of function HFE in haemochromatosis > decrease in CD8+
  • so both lead to a similarly skewed CD4+ to CD8+ ratio, just by a different route
The CD4+ CD8+ ratio is commonly used as a marker of the state of the immune system, i.e. for something that’s already happened. A more relevant question here is if a skewed ratio in itself can have important downstream effects on other cells, pathways, signalling...???

A quick search for the ratio in ME brought up 3 studies, one had an increased ratio, one a decreased one and the last one no difference from controls, so maybe it’s all just noise
 
Butyrate is being discussed in another thread. In this context it’s worth noting that iron is implicated in butyrate metabolism
As I understand it, iron status inside the gut affects how much butyrate bacteria produce. Butyrate levels, in turn, regulate iron metabolism. So it’s conceivable that HFE being up- or downregulated could mess with that loop and – maybe – lead to altered butyrate levels

AI suggests the following connections (tbc!)
”AI” said:
Iron availability significantly modulates butyrate production within the human gut microbiota. In a continuous in vitro colonic fermentation model mimicking a child's gut, moderate iron deficiency led to a 1.4-fold increase in butyrate production and a 5-fold increase in the expression of the butyryl-coenzyme A (CoA) CoA-transferase gene, a key enzyme in butyrate synthesis. However, very strong iron deficiency significantly decreased both butyrate concentrations and the abundance of butyrate-producing bacteria compared to normal iron conditions. Conversely, high iron levels enhanced butyrate and hydrogen production in cultures of the butyrate-producing bacterium Roseburia intestinalis, along with increased expression of relevant genes. This demonstrates a complex, non-linear relationship where both insufficient and excessive iron can disrupt optimal butyrate production.
The mechanism involves iron's role as a cofactor for enzymes in the butyrate production pathway. Under low-iron conditions, R. intestinalis preferentially produced lactate and showed reduced butyrate and hydrogen production, linked to the upregulation of the lactate dehydrogenase gene and downregulation of the pyruvate gene. Dietary heme iron, a potent source of iron, can also induce gut dysbiosis, characterized by an increase in potentially harmful bacteria like Enterobacteriaceae and a decrease in beneficial ones. This dysbiosis is associated with a reduction in fecal butyrate levels, likely due to decreased expression of key enzymes involved in butyrate synthesis, including butyrate kinase, phosphate butyryltransferase, and the α subunit of butyryl-CoA CoA-transferase.

Furthermore, butyrate itself plays a crucial role in iron homeostasis, creating a feedback loop. Butyrate has been shown to prevent anemia-inflammation circuits by promoting ferroportin (FPN)-dependent iron export from macrophages, thereby maintaining serum iron levels independently of inflammation. This suggests that butyrate not only depends on iron availability for its production but also actively regulates iron metabolism, highlighting a bidirectional relationship between iron and butyrate in gut health.
AI references these two papers, I haven’t read them but a quick skim shows the second one also mentions HDAC1 which popped up in connection with the SUDS3 gene (though possibly in the opposite direction?)

Iron Modulates Butyrate Production by a Child Gut Microbiota In Vitro (2015) A Dostal et al

Butyrate Prevents the Pathogenic Anemia-Inflammation Circuit by Facilitating Macrophage Iron Export (2024) Peng Xiao et al
 
As I understand it, iron status inside the gut affects how much butyrate bacteria produce. Butyrate levels, in turn, regulate iron metabolism.

Interesting connection but I am very sceptical about suggestions that what is going on in the gut (colon) are crucial to any diseases much, other than colitis. People regularly have defunctioning colostomies so that their colon is empty of any bacteria much and it seems to make no obvious difference to the rest of them. Bowel prep for surgery and endoscopy similarly doesn't seem to have much systemic effect. It seems to me very unlikely that our homeostatic mechanisms are subject to the whim of passing bacteria. Bacterial butyrate may be important but my guess is that like most vitamins, to actually get deficient is quite hard. So I am sceptical of claims that butyrate 'regulates' or is 'crucial to homeostasis'.

The does not exclude, however, the possibility that in the one situation where a disease mechanism is specifically butyrate dependent - which might be ME/CFS - gut status might not impact symptoms to some degree.
 
Back
Top Bottom