Enduring Outcomes of COVID-19 Work Absences on the US Labor Market, 2025, Dennett

Dolphin

Senior Member (Voting Rights)

Original Investigation
Public Health

Enduring Outcomes of COVID-19 Work Absences on the US Labor Market​

  1. Julia M. Dennett, PhD1,2; Evan J. Soltas, PhD3,4; Gopi Shah Goda, PhD5
  2. et al


JAMA Netw Open
Published Online: October 10, 2025
2025;8;(10):e2536635. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.36635


Key Points
Question Following the COVID-19 pandemic, has SARS-CoV-2 circulation been associated with health-related absences from work and labor force exits?

Findings In this nationally representative cohort study of approximately 158.4 million workers, rates of health-related work absences remained elevated after the pandemic and were associated with circulating SARS-CoV-2 and subsequent decreases in labor force participation by absence-affected workers.

Meaning These findings suggest that COVID-19 may have created a new year-round baseline for work absences that is similar to influenza season conditions before the pandemic; policymakers should consider expanding interventions and data collection efforts to address the negative impacts of COVID-19 on the labor force.

Abstract
Importance Although the adverse outcomes of the COVID-19 pandemic on the US labor market have been well documented, the impacts of ongoing SARS-CoV-2 circulation are less clear.

Objective To determine the extent to which COVID-19 continues to generate work absences and decrease labor force participation beyond the pandemic period in the US.

Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study used monthly data from employed survey respondents in the nationally representative Current Population Survey spanning January 2010 to December 2024 and linked to COVID-19 wastewater surveillance data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The setting was the US before the COVID-19 pandemic (before March 2020), during the pandemic (March 2020 to April 2023), and after the end of the public health emergency declaration (May 2023 to December 2024).

Exposures COVID-19 prevalence as measured by wastewater viral activity levels and comparisons across the periods before, during, and after the pandemic.

Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcomes were health-related absences from work and subsequent labor force exits. The association between health-related absences and all measures of wastewater viral activity was analyzed using state-level data and linear regressions with state and month fixed effects.

Results The study cohort was the employed US population and represented approximately 158.4 million workers in February 2020. At this baseline, approximately 35% of workers (55.3 million workers) were aged 15 to 34 years, 41% (65.1 million workers) were aged 35 to 54 years, and 24% (38.0 million workers) were aged 55 years and older; 48% (75.2 million workers) were female; 1% (1.7 million workers) were American Indian, 7% (10.5 million workers) were Asian, 18% (27.7 million workers) were Hispanic, 11% (18.1 million workers) were non-Hispanic Black, and 62% (97.9 million workers) were non-Hispanic White; and 33% (52.5 million workers) had educational attainment of high school or less. Adverse outcomes from the COVID-19 pandemic persisted, although at attenuated levels compared with the acute pandemic period. Health-related absences from work continued to track COVID-19 circulation and were 12.9% higher in the postpandemic period compared with before the pandemic (140 000 monthly absences). Workers in occupations at greater risk of exposure and some demographic groups continued to experience elevated levels of absences in the postpandemic period. Specifically, absences were 8.1% higher for workers in low work-from-home occupations and 12.5% higher for workers in high physical proximity occupations compared with prepandemic values. Labor force exits after a health-related absence also continued to be elevated, with 13.1% more exits in the postpandemic period compared with before the pandemic (13 500 monthly exits).

Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study of employed workers in the US, the new year-round baseline for work absences appeared to be on par with the levels formerly confined to prepandemic influenza season conditions. Policymakers should consider the consequences for workers, including the value of policies and actions that mitigate the spread of COVID-19 in the workplace. This study additionally highlights the potential for using nationally representative labor market data to monitor the impacts of public health crises.

 

News Release 10-Oct-2025

Enduring outcomes of COVID-19 work absences on the US labor market​

JAMA Network Open

Peer-Reviewed Publication
JAMA Network

About The Study: In this cohort study of employed workers in the U.S., the new year-round baseline for work absences appeared to be on par with the levels formerly confined to pre-pandemic influenza season conditions. Policymakers should consider the consequences for workers, including the value of policies and actions that mitigate the spread of COVID-19 in the workplace. This study additionally highlights the potential for using nationally representative labor market data to monitor the impacts of public health crises.
 
Old and foolish: COVID is no worse than the flu in terms of long-term health consequences, and thus those consequences can be entirely ignored.

Young and wise: COVID causes long-term health consequences, which medicine has no ability to treat, predict or manage, but year-round, all the time, and is more contagious and mutates far more and faster, on top of the threat from not just influenza but all other infectious diseases, so a massive effort needs to be undertaken to develop solutions, the costs are so massive that any amount is worth the investment.

I'm not sure what's the point of experts when those who get it wrong are constantly promoted and those who get it right are ignored. In the old trope about how every disaster movie starts with scientists being ignored, it entirely misses the point that in real life, it's other scientists with a different agenda who will assure those in power they can ignore them and that they should listen to them instead.

And that's not a movie trope, it's just real life.
Policymakers should consider the consequences for workers, including the value of policies and actions that mitigate the spread of COVID-19 in the workplace
Just workers, uh? I know this is a study about the labour market, but the problem is the same for everyone. Ignoring those who can't work, including for health reasons, has long been a problem with this. By granting value to human life strictly based on our labour potential, so much economic potential has been wasted that it probably overshoots most measures taken elsewhere.
 
Back
Top Bottom