Trial Report Effectiveness of Colchicine for the Treatment of Long COVID: A Randomized Clinical Trial, 2025, Bassi et al.

SNT Gatchaman

Senior Member (Voting Rights)
Staff member
Effectiveness of Colchicine for the Treatment of Long COVID: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Abhinav Bassi; Niveditha Devasenapathy; Shani S Thankachen; Arpita Ghosh; Aman Rastogi; Ritika Khan; Bijini Bahuleyan; Balaji Gummidi; Aneesh Basheer; Thekkumkara Prabhakaran Sreelal; Ashfak Bangi; Yasmeen Shaikh; Dibakar Sahu; Vinay Rathore; Ashish Bhalla; Samita Samita; Merlin Blessan; T S Dipu; Manish Jain; Abhishek Mukundbhai Prajapati; Narendra Kuber Bodhey; Vivekanand Jha

IMPORTANCE
Long COVID is characterized by persistent symptoms after SARS-CoV-2 infection, with inflammation playing a key role in pathogenesis. Colchicine, an established anti-inflammatory agent, may reduce these symptoms by targeting inflammatory pathways.

OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the superiority of colchicine over placebo in improving functional outcome at 52 weeks from baseline.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
This double-blind, 1:1 randomized clinical trial recruited participants with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and persistent symptoms from 8 hospitals in 6 states in India between January 2022 and July 2023. Individuals were eligible if they had functional limitation (Post–COVID-19 Functional Status scale grade 2 or more) and/or elevated inflammatory markers (high-sensitivity C-reactive protein >0.20 mg/dL and/or neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio >5). Outcomes were assessed at 12, 26, and 52 weeks after randomization. Data were analyzed from January to February 2025.

INTERVENTIONS
Participants were randomly assigned to receive colchicine, 0.5 mg, once or twice daily, based on body weight, or placebo for 26 weeks.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
The primary outcome was the change in distance walked during a 6-minute walk test from baseline to 52 weeks. Secondary outcomes included changes in inflammatory markers and patient-reported outcome measures, such as quality of life, anxiety, depression, fatigue, dyspnea, measured using validated instruments.

RESULTS
Of 346 participants included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis, 209 (60.4%) were female, 137 (39.6%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 46 (12) years. At 52 weeks, there was no difference in mean (SD) change in 6-minute walk test distance between the colchicine and placebo groups (colchicine, 35.5 [19.76] m; placebo, 29.96 [19.83] m; mean difference, 5.59 m; 95% CI, –9.00 to 20.18;P = .45). Similar null findings were seen across all predefined outcomes, except for a small, nonclinically relevant difference in the mean (SD) ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 second to forced vital capacity (colchicine, −0.02 [0.03]; placebo, −0.06 [0.03]; mean difference, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.07;P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
In this randomized clinical trial, among adults with long COVID, colchicine did not improve functional capacity, respiratory function, or inflammatory markers. These findings underscore the need to explore alternative therapeutic approaches for long COVID.

TRIAL REGISTRATION
Clinical Trial Registry of India:CTRI/2021/11/038234

KEY POINTS
Question What is the effectiveness of 28-week oral colchicine therapy in improving functional outcomes among individuals with persistent symptoms after acute COVID-19 infection?

Findings In this randomized clinical trial including 346 adults, there was no statistically significant difference in functional capacity, respiratory function, mental states, constitutional symptoms, or inflammatory markers at 52 weeks among those treated with colchicine or placebo.

Meaning This trial provides evidence against colchicine monotherapy as a broadly effective treatment for long COVID.

Web | PDF | JAMA Internal Medicine | Paywall
 

Effectiveness of colchicine for the treatment of long COVID​

JAMA Internal Medicine

Peer-Reviewed Publication
JAMA Network


FacebookXLinkedInWeChatBlueskyMessageWhatsAppEmail

About The Study: In this randomized clinical trial, among adults with long COVID, colchicine did not improve functional capacity, respiratory function, or inflammatory markers. These findings underscore the need to explore alternative therapeutic approaches for long COVID.

Corresponding Author: To contact the corresponding author, Niveditha Devasenapathy, PhD, MBBS, MSc, email ndevasenapathy@georgeinstitute.org.in.

To access the embargoed study: Visit our For The Media website at this link https://media.jamanetwork.com/

(doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.5408)

Editor’s Note: Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, conflict of interest and financial disclosures, and funding and support.

# # #

Embed this link to provide your readers free access to the full-text article This link will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/ja...ign=ftm_links&utm_content=tfl&utm_term=102025


Journal​

JAMA Internal Medicine
Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.

Media Contact

JAMA Network Media Relations
JAMA Network
mediarelations@jamanetwork.org

More on this News Release​

Effectiveness of colchicine for the treatment of long COVID​


JAMA Network

JournalJAMA Internal Medicine

Keywords​

 
Back
Top Bottom