1. Sign our petition calling on Cochrane to withdraw their review of Exercise Therapy for CFS here.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Guest, the 'News in Brief' for the week beginning 15th April 2024 is here.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Welcome! To read the Core Purpose and Values of our forum, click here.
    Dismiss Notice

Edinburgh Long Covid Study, led by Alan Carson

Discussion in 'Long Covid news' started by Andy, Aug 13, 2022.

  1. Andy

    Andy Committee Member

    Messages:
    21,956
    Location:
    Hampshire, UK
    About the project
    People with Long Covid have described experiencing cognitive problems, including problems with memory, concentration, and judgement.

    The aim of this study is to explain cognitive impairment in Long Covid and to find out whether the cognitive impairment is associated with an underlying condition. This can help doctors to prescribe the right treatment.

    Project team
    The project is led by Professor Alan Carson.

    University of Edinburgh team members are Laura McWhirter, Nadine Cosette, David Gillespie, Alison Green, David Hunt, Craig Ritchie, Jon Stone, Joanna Wardlaw, Catherine Pennington, and Siddharthan Chandran.

    https://www.annerowlingclinic.org/research-trials/find-project/edinburgh-long-covid-study


    From the Participant Information Sheet

    "What is the purpose of the study? You are being asked to take part in a study that aims to produce the most detailed clinical description of persistent cognitive symptoms after a positive COVID-19 diagnosis to date. Problems with memory and cognition have been demonstrated to be the most common and disabling complaints after COVID-19. It is possible that the cognitive symptoms of ‘long Covid’ are in fact due to several alternative conditions. It is important to be able to identify and separate these conditions in order to provide evidence-based treatment and effective rehabilitation strategies that are tailored to them. It is hoped that this study will improve the understanding of underlying causes of cognitive symptoms in the ‘long Covid’ population."

    https://www.annerowlingclinic.org/s...IS_final copy REC and R D approved (002).pdf


    From the Health Research Authority ethics decision

    Clinical phenotyping of cognitive disorders in 'long covid' [COVID-19]

    Research summary

    People with ‘Long Covid’ describe memory and concentration problems. Studies examining how people perform on memory and intelligence tests have found that patients who have had COVID-19 perform worse than those who have not. But to date, we don’t know why they have poorer cognitive function.

    Memory and concentration symptoms in ‘Long Covid’ are likely to have different causes in different people. Some may have had direct infection or inflammation of the brain, or blockages to blood vessels in the brain. In others, underlying brain disease may have been ‘unmasked’ by COVID-19. Some may have functional cognitive disorders, where memory and concentration problems are the result of changes in the brain’s ‘software’. In others, anxiety, low mood or fatigue may contribute to their symptoms. Each of these conditions has a different outcome and treatment.

    This study aims to closely examine 100 people with persisting cognitive symptoms after COVID-19, assessing the cognitive problems as well as markers of brain damage, inflammation, and underlying degenerative brain disease.

    We expect this study to provide scientific evidence to allow health services to provide targeted and effective treatment and rehabilitation for people with memory and concentration symptoms as part of ‘Long Covid’.

    https://www.hra.nhs.uk/planning-and...f-cognitive-disorders-in-long-covid-covid-19/
     
  2. RedFox

    RedFox Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,245
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    I'm a former software developer and I don't know what that means. Machines have an orderly separation between software and hardware. Brains don't. This analogy is nonsense to anybody who understands how computers actually work.
     
  3. Adrian

    Adrian Administrator Staff Member

    Messages:
    6,486
    Location:
    UK
    The analogy is nonsense and I suspect not helpful when thinking about the problem. Its one that is used by the BPS crowd to suggest they are taking things seriously when they claim CBT can cure ME. And I wouldn't trust any research done by this group. The translation in their minds is clearly that you think yourself ill.


    Although I will say in a modern computer system the separations between hardware and software are not simple (for example, the main CPU will have microcode which is essentially software and even microcode patches that fix hardware issues! Also there are many microcontrollers (disk, keyboard, USB, etc which will have firmware).

    I worry this is a route for them to say that some long covid patients are depressed or have a 'dissociative disorder' thus trying to dismiss the actual problems. We know their diagnostic questionnaires for things like depression aren't good enough to separate depression from being ill (We've discussed things like HADS on many occasions although I would hope they are not using that scale here).
    Yes this is about trying to dismiss symptoms and say it can all be cured with CBT when we know there is no evidence for that.

    I do think a good study could be done on cognitive aspects of long covid or ME as a longitudinal study by setting tasks and timing etc to see have different mental abilities vary (and correlate this with activity and reported levels of sickness).

    From the patient info sheet they do an MRI scan to look for brain damage which I suspect is so they can claim that nothing physical is wrong (and they even say there may be things 'incidental' to symptoms). But perhaps I'm being too cynical. What could be interesting is to have a set of 100 MRI scans that could be used by others but they would need comparing with norm - I do, for example, wonder if throwing them (with normal scans) at a deep neural network would find something although you would need more than 100 samples (even with transfer learning).

    They are also doing a lumber puncture again to look for brain damage (proteins associated with brain damage). If I remember correctly Lipkin found some signals in cerebrospinal fluid but they don't say what they are looking for and whether they would look for other things that have been reported. Again it feels like a lost opportunity to look for things that may be different and potential markers rather than looking for things they don't expect to find.

    Wouldn't this be MS if that were the case?
     
  4. Sean

    Sean Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    7,210
    Location:
    Australia
    Who wants to predict the findings of this study?
     
  5. Adrian

    Adrian Administrator Staff Member

    Messages:
    6,486
    Location:
    UK
    I was just thinking this could we write the discussion section of their paper and have a good guess at the contents.
     
  6. rvallee

    rvallee Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    12,464
    Location:
    Canada
    Yup. It's not even just wrong, it's comically wrong. Von Neumann architecture is so radically different from biology it has nothing whatsoever to do. I don't get how this analogy is so popular, it's so mediocre. And that's just classical computers, quantum computers are even more radically different.

    I guess it's only popular because of how popular magical thinking about the mystical powers of the mind are.

    I also don't understand the point of doing studies like this where the "researchers" plainly state the conclusion they will reach. It's purely manufacturing reality, explicitly facilitating pseudoscience for its own sake. Medicine has lost the plot, barely seems interested in treating illness anymore, it's all lifestyle and perception and a bunch of quackery taking place of real work.
     
  7. MEMarge

    MEMarge Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,750
    Location:
    UK
    Wonder how much reearch money will be wasted this time?
     
    Hutan, alktipping, Trish and 4 others like this.
  8. Andy

    Andy Committee Member

    Messages:
    21,956
    Location:
    Hampshire, UK
  9. rvallee

    rvallee Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    12,464
    Location:
    Canada
    Ugh. What a terrible mix. Even has an exercise trial. Completely wasted.

    I'll never stop being shocked over how provincial medicine is, even research. Everyone does their small thing in their small corner, leverage nothing, share nothing with others. Small teams with small projects that never lead anywhere. But if you want maximum redundancy and wastefulness, they've taken it to an art form. Like building a large building for a single event, then bringing it all down and starting over from scratch every time. Nothing builds on itself. It's maddening. Of course there's never any progress given these conditions.

    It doesn't take too much imagination to think of how awful scientific progress would be if other fields of science were the same. If physics and astronomy had never built a single giant telescope, let alone one out there in space, no particle accelerators, nothing big, only small thinking allowed. I don't get it. I guess it must follow the eternal conviction that they already know everything so there's no need for that. What a waste of opportunity, it's quite literally making our civilization worse.
     
  10. RedFox

    RedFox Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,245
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    Plus the fact that physicists apparently like p-values of 3 in 10 million, rather than .05.
     
  11. alex3619

    alex3619 Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,143
    That has been my position for 30 years now. Its a nonsense description, confusing and conflating the underlying issues.
     
    EzzieD, DokaGirl, Sean and 2 others like this.
  12. SNT Gatchaman

    SNT Gatchaman Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    4,455
    Location:
    Aotearoa New Zealand
    I don't.
     
    rvallee, EzzieD, Sean and 9 others like this.
  13. Sid

    Sid Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,057
    Another worthless trash study aiming to rediagnose patients with MUS and treat them with CBT which has already been shown not to work.
     
  14. Snow Leopard

    Snow Leopard Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,827
    Location:
    Australia
    It's mind-body dualism disguised with other words.
     
    FMMM1, rvallee, EzzieD and 5 others like this.
  15. Hutan

    Hutan Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    26,933
    Location:
    Aotearoa New Zealand
    Last edited: Aug 16, 2022
    Trish and Cheshire like this.

Share This Page