EAT-Lancet study under scrutiny

[Unable]

Interesting spotlight on Lancet procedures in another area:

 

[rvallee]

Interesting spotlight on Lancet procedures in another area:

Hey, no worries, the editor of Cochrane said this is common and absolutely fine as long as most people agree with the underlying assumptions.

But it does make me curious about who reviewed PACE and the other ME papers. It probably helps when the editor agrees with you and doesn't even need to see the research to tout it as groundbreaking. Makes it all easier for the researchers, no harm done, well, except for the patients of course.

 

[Hoopoe]

The homework of children at school is subject to better quality control than this.

 

[Suffolkres]

 

[Arnie Pye]

Some more links from people not happy with Eat Lancet :

20 Ways EAT Lancet's Global Diet is Wrongfully Vilifying Meat - Sustainable Dish

The EAT Lancet diet is nutritionally deficient – Zoë Harcombe

Joanna Blythman on Twitter: "Pesticides, fertilisers, #gm (Bayer/Monsanto, BASF, Syngenta);sugar+fake flavourings/colourings (PepsiCo, Nestle, Givaudin, Symrise);ultraprocessed grains/starches (Cargill, Kellogg’s);#palmoil (Olam); additives and enzymes (DSM)- companies backing #EatLancet diet. I wonder why?… https://t.co/DmDwwkHqrW"

The inconvenient truths behind the 'Planetary Health' diet | GreenBiz

EAT-Lancet's Plant-Based Planet: 10 Things You Need to Know | Psychology Today