ME/CFS Skeptic
Senior Member (Voting Rights)
Just watched the fictional TV-show 'Dopesick' and the HBO-documentary 'The Crime of the Century'. Both are about the opioid crisis in the US.
They tell the story of how in the 1990s a pharmaceutical company 'Purdue Pharma' started marketing their opoid painkiller OxyContin to regular pain patients instead of the cancer patients with extreme pain it was originally intended for. They lobbied the FDA (one of the regulators later started working for Purdue) to include statements on the label suggesting the drug was less addictive than other opoids because it was coated. There were no studies to back this up but Purdue used an aggressive marketing campaign with misleading charts to convince doctors that OxyContin was not addictive and that it could be prescribed long-term for all sorts of pain.
When patients did become addicted they invented theories and hired experts that always had 'increase the dose' as the solution. If patients kept complaining about pain, they were said to have 'breakthrough pain' so they would need a higher dose. When patients (and doctors) became addicted it was said to be 'pseudo-addiction': they longed for the the meds because they were still in pain, not because they were addicted. They had an unrecognised pain and doctors had to prescribe more.
Unsurprisingly, blame was shifted to patients: the drug was safe, the abusers were the problem. If you became addicted, then this was not because of the drug but because of you, your addictive personality etc. You would probably have become addicted to something else if it was not OxyContin etc.
In another documentary I watched about this topic, there was a mother who explained during a protest: "They caused me, believing what the doctors said, to be an accomplice to my son's death. When my son talked about his pain, I said: 'did you take your pills?'"
I might not have a completed overview on the problem, but the story touched me. It shows how the medical system can be corrupted and although very different, I saw some similarities to how poorly ME/CFS patients have been treated.
They tell the story of how in the 1990s a pharmaceutical company 'Purdue Pharma' started marketing their opoid painkiller OxyContin to regular pain patients instead of the cancer patients with extreme pain it was originally intended for. They lobbied the FDA (one of the regulators later started working for Purdue) to include statements on the label suggesting the drug was less addictive than other opoids because it was coated. There were no studies to back this up but Purdue used an aggressive marketing campaign with misleading charts to convince doctors that OxyContin was not addictive and that it could be prescribed long-term for all sorts of pain.
When patients did become addicted they invented theories and hired experts that always had 'increase the dose' as the solution. If patients kept complaining about pain, they were said to have 'breakthrough pain' so they would need a higher dose. When patients (and doctors) became addicted it was said to be 'pseudo-addiction': they longed for the the meds because they were still in pain, not because they were addicted. They had an unrecognised pain and doctors had to prescribe more.
Unsurprisingly, blame was shifted to patients: the drug was safe, the abusers were the problem. If you became addicted, then this was not because of the drug but because of you, your addictive personality etc. You would probably have become addicted to something else if it was not OxyContin etc.
In another documentary I watched about this topic, there was a mother who explained during a protest: "They caused me, believing what the doctors said, to be an accomplice to my son's death. When my son talked about his pain, I said: 'did you take your pills?'"
I might not have a completed overview on the problem, but the story touched me. It shows how the medical system can be corrupted and although very different, I saw some similarities to how poorly ME/CFS patients have been treated.