David Tuller: Trial By Error: Three Years On...

a potential new ally? wonder what he would make of PACE?
https://twitter.com/user/status/993362166496428033


see also:
http://jonathanshedler.com/wp-conte...s-the-evidence-for-evidence-based-therapy.pdf
https://ipa.informz.net/IPA/data/images/.Shedler BPC interview-update.pdf
http://jonathanshedler.com/

he covers a lot of the issues @Brian Hughes does in his book 'Psychology in Crisis'.

 

As in GET, CBT-a-la-PACE, LP, etc, all making supposedly "evidence based" claims .

 

See also https://www.s4me.info/threads/selling-bad-therapy-to-trauma-victims.1438/.

 

Interesting statistic from Keith Geraghty: 95%+ of large psychological studies reported statistically significant results:
https://twitter.com/user/status/1097933920748924928


This is statistically... stinky. Literally impossible. There seems to be no internal criticism within the field, everything is significant and beneficial. It seems no one criticizes each other so they won't get criticized themselves, because flaws are far too often a matter of interpretation and opinion.

When every result is significant, none are.

(kinda LOL that it comes from Goldacre, who is a huge fan of the mindfulness new age junk for which evidence exists only within the mindfulness new age mutual admiration society)