1. Guest, the 'News in Brief' for the week beginning 19th July 2021 is here.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Welcome! To read the Core Purpose and Values of our forum, click here.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Contribute to feedback on the CDC Evidence Review, for more details click here
    Dismiss Notice

David Tuller: Trial By Error: More Letters About BMJ’s Flawed Pediatric Studies

Discussion in 'General ME/CFS News' started by Andy, Jun 11, 2018.

  1. Andy

    Andy Committee Member (& Outreach when energy allows)

    Messages:
    13,597
    Likes Received:
    98,292
    Location:
    Hampshire, UK
    http://www.virology.ws/2018/06/11/trial-by-error-more-letters-about-bmjs-flawed-pediatric-studies/
     
    Allele, TiredSam, ukxmrv and 27 others like this.
  2. Invisible Woman

    Invisible Woman Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    9,622
    Likes Received:
    57,575
    @dave30th is already providing great value for money. Well worth every penny! :thumbup:
     
    Allele, ukxmrv, Keela Too and 21 others like this.
  3. Esther12

    Esther12 Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    4,090
    Likes Received:
    33,163
    I wonder if Bishop will respond. It pisses me off how she says so many good general things about the need to address problems with research, but then with CFS she ignores all the problems, and even helps White/Crawley's attempts to discredit their critics.

    Thanks to David for all these.

    I think that it's quite handy that these studies have quite 'simple' problems with them that can be focussed on in letters like this. Compared to PACE, this is more about a simple failure to follow quite clear rules.

    I wonder if there's any benefit to cc'ing Groves? If not, could it work against us in anyway? I don't know, but just tend to be cautious with anything that could be taken out of context to seem like 'harassment' to the genteel members of the UK medical establishment.
     
    Last edited: Jun 13, 2018
    Trish likes this.
  4. NelliePledge

    NelliePledge Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    8,135
    Likes Received:
    48,157
    Location:
    UK West Midlands
    I don’t think trying to argue it is harassment would work @Esther12 its pretty standard to copy people into a letter that refers to them. And TG would no doubt be asked for her perspective by most of these folks anyway before they decide how to reply to DT so will get copies that way.

    I think not responding by any of them would be a bad move as it just makes them look complicit in a conspiracy. Most likely replies will be some kind of brief non response. Defensive batting is the hallmark of the establishment cricket style. If DT keeps bowling though he’s going to hit someone’s wicket over. :D
     
  5. Sly Saint

    Sly Saint Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    6,266
    Likes Received:
    51,421
    Location:
    UK
    @dave30th

    I have not gone into this in any great detail but was looking on the WHO ICTRP
    http://www.who.int/ictrp/en/

    Under trial registration orgs there is:
    UK Research Integrity Office, Code of Practice for Research (3.7.13)

    http://ukrio.org/sites/ukrio2/the_programme_of_work/live_document___code_of_practice_for_research/3_0_standards_for_organisations_and_researchers/3_7_research_involving_human_participants__human_material_or_personal_data.cfm


    They have a get advice from tab with general contact info.

    I noticed on the WHO site that the BMJ is on their list of publishers
    http://www.who.int/ictrp/trial_reg/en/index2.html

    don't know if these might provide other avenues for you to pursue(?)

     
    Amw66 and NelliePledge like this.

Share This Page