Well I suppose any favourable comments might be deemed as promoting the treatment and introducing bias..... and of course they wouldn't dream of doing that
Crawley is using the 6 month FITNET results to justify those figures, though that trial's result were unusual, and showed no significant difference between groups at long-term follow up.
Crawley is using the 6 month FITNET results to justify those figures, though that trial's result were unusual, and showed no significant difference between groups at long-term follow up.
There are a lot of concerns about this. Portraying it as a treatment before it has gone through a trial should have been picked up well before now; goodness knows I have tried. I wrote a blog here about the impact of such a trial
But I took a snippet of the protocol which is on PDF I think online which is the main problem of the whole thing
children are being asked to go on the research trial, even the GPs are asking them to go on the trial. Mary Jane Willows helped to get it through the Ethics committee.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.