Rick Sanchez
Senior Member (Voting Rights)
The recommendations for Danish ‘funktionelle lidelser’ in English called 'functional disorders' were released today, monday the 18th of june.
Available @
https://www.sst.dk/da/nyheder/2018/~/media/15C564788C0B445682C87695A2AFF6CD.ashx
The recommendations are so terrible that I believe they deserve a thread of their own. They are much worse than what ME/CFS patients expected.
There is a brief summary in English about the recommendations that does not say much about anything.
On CBT and GET as treatment
The following is my Danish translation of the bit regarding CBT and GET as treatment for ME/CFS. I have skiped some of the parts regarding IBS and fibro, which is why the following might seem disjointed.
In conclusion. The Danish Health Authority recommends CBT and GET for the Danish CFS patients.
On functional disorders / Bodily Distress Syndrome / Lack of ME/CFS diagnosis
One of the most severe problems when it comes to ME/CFS in Denmark is that the diagnosis simply de facto isn't given. This is a result of the long battle of Per Fink against the ME/CFS diagnosis in Denmark. The last recommendations from 2008 on ME/CFS specifically seemed to argue AGAINST giving out the ME/CFS diagnsis, on the basis that it would be unwise to prioritize any one of the different so-called ''illnesses'' that fall under the functional disorder diagnosis, in the fear that one diagnosis might become too popular (Yes, that was the explanation they came up with)
The report doesn't really deal with the entire issue of giving the ME/CFS diagnosis at all. The report seems to just ignore the entire Bodily Distress Syndrome / Functional disorder diagnosis / CFS diagnosis problem entirely. Very sad, but not surprising.
Not sure how much else there is to say, terrible, terrible recommendations.
If some of you could be so kind and write to the Danish Sundhedsstyrelse that you are shocked that they are still recommending GET as a treatment for ME/CFS then you can reach them here on twitter.
I am trying to engage them in a healthy debate, but no one seems to be responding.
I will be updating this thread with English translation of my own regarding the recommendations specifically aimed at ME/CFS
Available @
https://www.sst.dk/da/nyheder/2018/~/media/15C564788C0B445682C87695A2AFF6CD.ashx
The recommendations are so terrible that I believe they deserve a thread of their own. They are much worse than what ME/CFS patients expected.
There is a brief summary in English about the recommendations that does not say much about anything.
On CBT and GET as treatment
The following is my Danish translation of the bit regarding CBT and GET as treatment for ME/CFS. I have skiped some of the parts regarding IBS and fibro, which is why the following might seem disjointed.
There are evidence-based treatment guidelines and recommendations for a number of functional disorders among them, IBS, fibromyalgia, CFS.
Treatment should be given towards symptom relief, should be given to increase the quality of life of the patient, establish a good patient doctor relationship, make sure to individualize treatment, and make sure that non-pharmacological interventions are tried out first. The recommendations are in most cases built on weak evidence or consensus.
In 2011 The Danish Health Authority released a handbook about physical activity as prevention and treatment, wherein lies evidence based recommendations for different sorts of physical exercise as treatment for CFS.
As treatment for CFS, CBT is recommended and physical activity / activity in the form of GET is also recommended. Low dose amitriptyline is also recommended as treatment in patients who experience poor sleep or pain.
For patients with CFS, there is evidence of low to moderate strength for an effective training intervention against the patients fatigue, whilst there is evidence of moderate strength that exercise does not have serious negative effects. Furthermore, there is evidence that CBT has an effect on the fatigue of patients immediately after treatment. In the chapter on CFS in the Danish Health Authorities handbook on physical activity it is concluded that there is low to moderate evidence of positive effects of physical exercise, which includes graded exercise therapy.
In conclusion. The Danish Health Authority recommends CBT and GET for the Danish CFS patients.
On functional disorders / Bodily Distress Syndrome / Lack of ME/CFS diagnosis
One of the most severe problems when it comes to ME/CFS in Denmark is that the diagnosis simply de facto isn't given. This is a result of the long battle of Per Fink against the ME/CFS diagnosis in Denmark. The last recommendations from 2008 on ME/CFS specifically seemed to argue AGAINST giving out the ME/CFS diagnsis, on the basis that it would be unwise to prioritize any one of the different so-called ''illnesses'' that fall under the functional disorder diagnosis, in the fear that one diagnosis might become too popular (Yes, that was the explanation they came up with)
The report doesn't really deal with the entire issue of giving the ME/CFS diagnosis at all. The report seems to just ignore the entire Bodily Distress Syndrome / Functional disorder diagnosis / CFS diagnosis problem entirely. Very sad, but not surprising.
Not sure how much else there is to say, terrible, terrible recommendations.
If some of you could be so kind and write to the Danish Sundhedsstyrelse that you are shocked that they are still recommending GET as a treatment for ME/CFS then you can reach them here on twitter.
I am trying to engage them in a healthy debate, but no one seems to be responding.
I will be updating this thread with English translation of my own regarding the recommendations specifically aimed at ME/CFS
Last edited: