what would you have changed if you had waited? e.g. what kind of information would you have seen that would make you decide not to get vaccinated, or protocol that you would have used, or different vaccine, etc.?'
[ETA: or would you still be waiting? also in case it clarifies this is not a rhetorical or idle question. sounded like you had specific reasons.]
Let me think a moment.
Umm, thinking thing is broken. Lessee here.
Had I simply bothered to call Derek Enlander’s office, I would have reconsidered and probably bailed on it. He’s retired but still shares info and so forth. But I tend to fail at making and maintaining lines of communication without conscious thought, and thought is more broken than I perceive.
Oh, the point: DE had a practice of only M.E/Fibromyalgia patients, and thus has a critical mass of information. What I heard _after_ is that there was large number of patients who had reactions. They had the data early, since with 100% M.E/Fm pts, a non-trivial number had the shot before I did.
A little later, I could have asked my G.P, but the one person in the office (that I knew of) who had a clue about M.E was out. With Covid. He had one covid-aggravating pre-condition (that I know of) and had a rough time with the virus.
Net: I talked to no one in medicine about it, and was left to the internet for info. Total up the internet and it’s gossip in better clothes.
With a) more info and b) less defective thought process on my part, I would have chosen one of the following:
A: Wait for a different and older tech vaccine, not the one of the mRNAs. I don’t have any fears about the technology, but it is relatively new to medicine.
But what if it’s not the type of vaccine, but something else? Then it would be wise to
B: Wait for a vaccine that has good results with us, or a lower dose of one of the existing vaccines. There will be no official, gov’t sponsored study for that purpose, so I’d have to wait for some practice with many ME/Fb patients to gather enough anecdotal data.
While I had some concern that I wouldn’t do well with the covid/Wuhan virus, I also figured I had a small positive going on. Living in a crowded, filthy city and a 200-unit building, I must have been exposed to small doses of the virus a few times. That does provide some level of immunity and a better outcome with other virus, no reason it shouldn’t work for this one. Recently, a least one study has shown that exposure to similar coronavirus confers some immunity to SARS-2. For example, people exposed to SARS-1 fare pretty well with SARS-2, even though Original SARS was a decade back.
Net: The other decision was to wait for something with some form of evidence for safety with us, and if none existed get a half dose, or one dose. At this point it looks like _none_ would have been a better choice.