I don't know about the old review but the new review specifies the following selection criteria: PACE was not a RCT. It also plainly concluded no difference in outcome between treatment arms. As the biggest piece of evidence, its own conclusions do not match the review's conclusions. It seems the material is locked for now so I can't check the other trials but from Vink's review most of the other trials were not controlled as well. Not the first time I have seen this, using the RCT label then talking only of randomized trials. So it seems to be a new thing, I guess, that RCT also applies to randomized trials. Drop a word here. Add a word there. Change another word's meaning. Ridiculous.