Characterization of subchronic lung and brain consequences caused by mouse-adapted SARS-CoV-2 and influenza A infection of C57BL6 mice, 2026, Currey+

Chandelier

Senior Member (Voting Rights)
Characterization of subchronic lung and brain consequences caused by mouse-adapted SARS-CoV-2 and influenza A infection of C57BL6 mice

Currey, Joshua; Wang, Chenxiao; Mayer, Meredith G.; Chen, Yilin; Nisperuza Vidal, Ana Karina; Allen, Michaela J.; Khatun, Mst Shamima; Ellsworth, Calder R.; Islamuddin, Mohammad; Evangelista, Jefferson; Minor, Skye M.; Golden, Nadia; Zwezdaryk, Kevin J.; Maness, Nicholas J.; Blair, Robert V.; Kolls, Jay K.; Pociask, Derek A.; Fischer, Tracy; Qin, Xuebin

Abstract​

Introduction:

SARS-CoV-2 and, to a lesser extent, influenza A can lead to long-term complications in the respiratory and nervous systems.
However, the mechanisms driving post-viral sequelae remain poorly understood.

Methods:

To address this gap, we longitudinally characterized C57BL/6 mice infected with sublethal doses of mouse-adapted SARS-CoV-2 (MA30) or influenza A (PR8).
Lung and brain tissues were analyzed at 14-, 21-, and 28-days post-infection (DPI) using histological analysis and bulk-RNA sequencing.

Results:

In the lungs, both infections caused prolonged inflammation and fibrosis. MA30-infected lungs showed persistent upregulation of inflammation, coagulation, complement, as well as fibrotic, and extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling pathways at 21 DPI, alongside downregulation of epithelial junction and metabolic program pathways.
In contrast, PR8-infected lungs exhibited a strong acute interferon response and chronic upregulation of basal epithelial markers (e.g., Krt5, Krt14), consistent with epithelial regeneration.
Notably, only PR8-infected mice displayed KRT5+ progenitor cell migration into damaged lung regions, indicating divergence in repair mechanisms.
Neither MA30-infected, nor PR8-infected mice had detectable brain infection. However, MA30 mice, but not PR8-infected mice exhibited an elevated frequency of microhemorrhages at early timepoints and marked neuroinflammation at all timepoints.
Transcriptomic profiling of MA30-infected brains showed enrichment for up-regulation of ECM remodeling, vascular dysfunction, IL6-signaling pathways along with a virus-specific disruption of the hypothalamic–pituitary axis with MA30 infection not seen in PR8-infected brains.
These included genes linked to neuroinflammation, sensory processing disruption, and microvascular injury, mirroring clinical features of Long COVID.

Discussion:

Together, these findings establish distinct tissue-specific trajectories of long-term pathology following SARS-CoV-2 and influenza infection and provide a foundation for dissecting the mechanisms of post-viral lung and brain disease.

Web | DOI | Frontiers in Immunology
 

News Release 25-Feb-2026

Tulane study reveals key differences in long-term brain effects of COVID-19 and flu​

Disruption of serotonin and dopamine signaling pathways could explain why some feel 'brain fog' after being infected by COVID-19

Peer-Reviewed Publication
Tulane University


FacebookXLinkedInWeChatBlueskyMessageWhatsAppEmail

Even a mild case of COVID-19 or the flu can impact the body long after the fever and cough fade, according to new Tulane University research that may help explain why some people struggle to feel fully recovered weeks or months later.

Tulane researchers found that while both viruses can leave lasting lung damage, only SARS-CoV-2 infection caused persistent brain inflammation and small blood vessel injury, even after the virus was no longer detectable. The findings, published in Frontiers in Immunology, help explain why long COVID often includes neurological symptoms such as brain fog, fatigue and mood changes, while influenza is more commonly associated with respiratory complications.

“Influenza and COVID-19 affect large populations worldwide and carry a significant public health toll, yet the mechanisms behind their long-term effects remain poorly understood,” said Dr. Xuebin Qin, lead author and professor of microbiology and immunology at the Tulane National Biomedical Research Center.

To separate effects common to severe respiratory infections from those unique to COVID-19, researchers used a mouse model to examine lung and brain tissue after infection had cleared.

In the lungs, both viruses left behind a similar picture: immune cells that failed to fully stand down and increased buildup of collagen, a protein associated with scarring. Those changes can stiffen lung tissue and make breathing feel more labored — a possible biological explanation for why some people report lingering shortness of breath after respiratory infections.

But when the researchers looked more closely, they found a key difference. After the flu, the lungs appeared to switch into repair mode, sending specialized cells into damaged areas to help rebuild the lining of the airways. That repair response was largely missing after COVID-19 infection, suggesting the virus may interfere with the lung’s natural healing process.

The most striking differences appeared in the brain.

Although neither virus was found in brain tissue, mice that had COVID-19 showed signs of persistent brain inflammation weeks later, along with tiny areas of bleeding. Gene expression analysis revealed ongoing inflammatory signaling and disruption of pathways involved in serotonin and dopamine regulation, systems closely tied to mood, cognition and energy levels. These persistent changes were largely absent in influenza-infected animals.

“In both infections, we observed lasting lung injury,” Qin said. “But long-term effects in the brain were unique to SARS-CoV-2. That distinction is critical to understanding long COVID.”

This study was supported by an American Heart Association award Qin received as part of a national effort to understand the long-term cardiovascular and cerebrovascular effects of COVID-19. The findings shed new light on how vascular and immune changes may contribute to persistent neurological symptoms.

By defining these biological changes, the research offers a clearer foundation for monitoring patients and developing treatments aimed at preventing lasting damage. As lingering symptoms continue to complicate recovery for some, understanding what is driving them is essential to reducing long-term health consequences.

This research was supported by the American Heart Association Long COVID Impact Project (AHA962950), the National Institutes of Health, including P51OD011104-62 and R01HL165265, and institutional funding.


Journal​

Frontiers in Immunology

DOI​

10.3389/fimmu.2026.1755141

Subject of Research​

Animals

Article Title​

Characterization of Subchronic Lung and Brain Consequences Caused by Mouse-Adapted SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza A Infection of C57BL6 mice

Article Publication Date​

24-Feb-2026
 
Back
Top Bottom