Big little lies: a compendium and simulation of p-hacking strategies, 2023, Stefan & Schönbrodt

Discussion in 'Research methodology news and research' started by CRG, Feb 14, 2023.

  1. CRG

    CRG Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,857
    Location:
    UK
    Royal Society Open Science

    Big little lies: a compendium and simulation of p-hacking strategies

    Angelika M. Stefan and Felix D. Schönbrodt

    Abstract

    In many research fields, the widespread use of questionable research practices has jeopardized the credibility of scientific results. One of the most prominent questionable research practices is p-hacking.

    Typically, p-hacking is defined as a compound of strategies targeted at rendering non-significant hypothesis testing results significant. However, a comprehensive overview of these p-hacking strategies is missing, and current meta-scientific research often ignores the heterogeneity of strategies.

    Here, we compile a list of 12 p-hacking strategies based on an extensive literature review, identify factors that control their level of severity, and demonstrate their impact on false-positive rates using simulation studies.

    We also use our simulation results to evaluate several approaches that have been proposed to mitigate the influence of questionable research practices. Our results show that investigating p-hacking at the level of strategies can provide a better understanding of the process of p-hacking, as well as a broader basis for developing effective countermeasures.

    By making our analyses available through a Shiny app and R package, we facilitate future meta-scientific research aimed at investigating the ramifications of p-hacking across multiple strategies, and we hope to start a broader discussion about different manifestations of p-hacking in practice.

    Full article: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full/10.1098/rsos.220346

     
  2. Hutan

    Hutan Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    27,060
    Location:
    Aotearoa New Zealand
    I haven't read much of the paper yet, but it looks really useful. Good reading for any peer reviewer or patient representative in a research team. There's content there that would be useful for people about conducting research well and being critical about scientific papers. Also good for anyone interested in putting systems in place to ensure better quality research.

    ;) but it could be.


     

Share This Page